Quirion Druid
Played in 62 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
23.3% Green
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (7)
- Seton, Krosan Protector relevance 1.42 · 1.1% (7 of 609 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 1.33 · 1.6% (5 of 311 decks)
- Autumn Willow, Harmony relevance 0.97 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Bumi, Eclectic Earthbender relevance 0.95 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.63 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Greensleeves relevance 0.51 · 1.6% (1 of 63 decks)
- Marwyn, the Preserver relevance 0.50 · 1.4% (1 of 69 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 1.81 · 41.9% (26 of 62 decks)
- Nature's Revolt relevance 1.77 · 32.3% (20 of 62 decks)
- Living Lands relevance 1.55 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Natural Affinity relevance 1.46 · 27.4% (17 of 62 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 1.42 · 32.3% (20 of 62 decks)
- Awakening of Vitu-Ghazi relevance 1.42 · 25.8% (16 of 62 decks)
- Waker of the Wilds relevance 1.36 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 1.25 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Llanowar Loamspeaker relevance 1.22 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 1.13 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 1.12 · 22.6% (14 of 62 decks)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 1.11 · 24.2% (15 of 62 decks)
- Emergent Sequence relevance 1.09 · 19.4% (12 of 62 decks)
- Life and Limb relevance 1.08 · 25.8% (16 of 62 decks)
- Ambush Commander relevance 1.07 · 22.6% (14 of 62 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 1.06 · 51.6% (32 of 62 decks)
- Llanowar Druid relevance 1.06 · 22.6% (14 of 62 decks)
- Embodiment of Insight relevance 1.04 · 24.2% (15 of 62 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 1.01 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.98 · 24.2% (15 of 62 decks)
- Liege of the Tangle relevance 0.93 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
- Jolrael, Empress of Beasts relevance 0.86 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Earthbending Student relevance 0.85 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.85 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Rampaging Growth relevance 0.84 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Druid Lyrist relevance 0.84 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Wakeroot Elemental relevance 0.83 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Ainok Survivalist relevance 0.81 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Elvish Branchbender relevance 0.81 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Den Protector relevance 0.81 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
All creatures (26)
- Waker of the Wilds relevance 1.36 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 1.25 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Llanowar Loamspeaker relevance 1.22 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 1.12 · 22.6% (14 of 62 decks)
- Ambush Commander relevance 1.07 · 22.6% (14 of 62 decks)
- Llanowar Druid relevance 1.06 · 22.6% (14 of 62 decks)
- Embodiment of Insight relevance 1.04 · 24.2% (15 of 62 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.98 · 24.2% (15 of 62 decks)
- Liege of the Tangle relevance 0.93 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
- Jolrael, Empress of Beasts relevance 0.86 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Earthbending Student relevance 0.85 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Druid Lyrist relevance 0.84 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Wakeroot Elemental relevance 0.83 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Ainok Survivalist relevance 0.81 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Elvish Branchbender relevance 0.81 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Den Protector relevance 0.81 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Nantuko Vigilante relevance 0.78 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Toph, Earthbending Master relevance 0.74 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
- The Legend of Kyoshi // Avatar Kyoshi relevance 0.73 · 22.6% (14 of 62 decks)
- Hauntwoods Shrieker relevance 0.69 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Avatar Kyoshi, Earthbender relevance 0.67 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf Archdruid relevance 0.65 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.65 · 25.8% (16 of 62 decks)
- Bumi, Eclectic Earthbender relevance 0.65 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Badgermole relevance 0.64 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
- The Boulder, Ready to Rumble relevance 0.62 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
All enchantments (7)
- Nature's Revolt relevance 1.77 · 32.3% (20 of 62 decks)
- Living Lands relevance 1.55 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Life and Limb relevance 1.08 · 25.8% (16 of 62 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.77 · 24.2% (15 of 62 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.75 · 24.2% (15 of 62 decks)
- Solid Ground relevance 0.71 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
- Evolutionary Leap relevance 0.71 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
All instants (4)
- Natural Affinity relevance 1.46 · 27.4% (17 of 62 decks)
- Awakening of Vitu-Ghazi relevance 1.42 · 25.8% (16 of 62 decks)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 1.11 · 24.2% (15 of 62 decks)
- Rampaging Growth relevance 0.84 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 1.42 · 32.3% (20 of 62 decks)
- Emergent Sequence relevance 1.09 · 19.4% (12 of 62 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 1.01 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.85 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Rockalanche relevance 0.65 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
All planeswalkers (3)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 1.81 · 41.9% (26 of 62 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 1.13 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 1.06 · 51.6% (32 of 62 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Treetop Village relevance 1.00 · 22.6% (14 of 62 decks)
- Soulstone Sanctuary relevance 0.71 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Blinkmoth Nexus relevance 0.65 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.64 · 24.2% (15 of 62 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.63 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
EDH data for Quirion Druid: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 62 real decks.