Wall of Nets
Played in 121 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
3.2% Azorius
-
Bant 1,693 · 44.9%
-
Abzan 1,106 · 29.3%
-
White 347 · 9.2%
-
Jeskai 206 · 5.5%
-
Azorius 121 · 3.2%
- Other (11) 301 · 8.0%
630+29+4+7+6+2+1+1+
That's every commander.
All commanders (6)
- Gwafa Hazid, Profiteer relevance 1.38 · 1.9% (8 of 426 decks)
- Ayesha Tanaka relevance 0.93 · 2.4% (3 of 126 decks)
- Rasaad yn Bashir // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.67 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Rasaad yn Bashir // Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.56 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
- Clara Oswald // The Fifth Doctor relevance 0.37 · 1.1% (1 of 93 decks)
- Noble Heritage // Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher relevance 0.37 · 1.1% (1 of 94 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Wall of Denial relevance 2.60 · 57.0% (69 of 121 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 2.41 · 43.8% (53 of 121 decks)
- Wall of Stolen Identity relevance 1.97 · 29.8% (36 of 121 decks)
- Hover Barrier relevance 1.91 · 28.1% (34 of 121 decks)
- Fog Bank relevance 1.81 · 44.6% (54 of 121 decks)
- Jeskai Barricade relevance 1.79 · 27.3% (33 of 121 decks)
- Weathered Sentinels relevance 1.78 · 28.9% (35 of 121 decks)
- Wall of Shards relevance 1.73 · 25.6% (31 of 121 decks)
- Wall of Runes relevance 1.71 · 28.1% (34 of 121 decks)
- Crystal Barricade relevance 1.62 · 40.5% (49 of 121 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 1.59 · 33.9% (41 of 121 decks)
- High Alert relevance 1.50 · 29.8% (36 of 121 decks)
- Angelic Wall relevance 1.42 · 21.5% (26 of 121 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 1.29 · 26.4% (32 of 121 decks)
- Shield Sphere relevance 1.26 · 24.0% (29 of 121 decks)
- Guard Gomazoa relevance 1.20 · 19.8% (24 of 121 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 1.17 · 43.8% (53 of 121 decks)
- Teyo, Geometric Tactician relevance 1.13 · 20.7% (25 of 121 decks)
- Amaranthine Wall relevance 1.10 · 16.5% (20 of 121 decks)
- Stoneskin relevance 1.09 · 19.8% (24 of 121 decks)
- Retribution of the Meek relevance 1.05 · 15.7% (19 of 121 decks)
- Ward of Bones relevance 1.04 · 16.5% (20 of 121 decks)
- Web of Inertia relevance 1.04 · 18.2% (22 of 121 decks)
- Rammas Echor, Ancient Shield relevance 1.02 · 20.7% (25 of 121 decks)
- Dusk // Dawn relevance 1.02 · 27.3% (33 of 121 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 1.02 · 19.0% (23 of 121 decks)
- Rune-Sealed Wall relevance 1.01 · 18.2% (22 of 121 decks)
- Vedalken Shackles relevance 1.01 · 14.9% (18 of 121 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 0.96 · 20.7% (25 of 121 decks)
- Wave of Reckoning relevance 0.96 · 14.9% (18 of 121 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Wall of Denial relevance 2.60 · 57.0% (69 of 121 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 2.41 · 43.8% (53 of 121 decks)
- Wall of Stolen Identity relevance 1.97 · 29.8% (36 of 121 decks)
- Hover Barrier relevance 1.91 · 28.1% (34 of 121 decks)
- Fog Bank relevance 1.81 · 44.6% (54 of 121 decks)
- Jeskai Barricade relevance 1.79 · 27.3% (33 of 121 decks)
- Weathered Sentinels relevance 1.78 · 28.9% (35 of 121 decks)
- Wall of Shards relevance 1.73 · 25.6% (31 of 121 decks)
- Wall of Runes relevance 1.71 · 28.1% (34 of 121 decks)
- Crystal Barricade relevance 1.62 · 40.5% (49 of 121 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 1.59 · 33.9% (41 of 121 decks)
- Angelic Wall relevance 1.42 · 21.5% (26 of 121 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 1.29 · 26.4% (32 of 121 decks)
- Shield Sphere relevance 1.26 · 24.0% (29 of 121 decks)
- Guard Gomazoa relevance 1.20 · 19.8% (24 of 121 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 1.17 · 43.8% (53 of 121 decks)
- Amaranthine Wall relevance 1.10 · 16.5% (20 of 121 decks)
- Rune-Sealed Wall relevance 1.01 · 18.2% (22 of 121 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 0.96 · 20.7% (25 of 121 decks)
- Rasaad yn Bashir relevance 0.94 · 16.5% (20 of 121 decks)
- Baldin, Century Herdmaster relevance 0.94 · 19.0% (23 of 121 decks)
- The Fall of Lord Konda // Fragment of Konda relevance 0.94 · 14.0% (17 of 121 decks)
- Flumph relevance 0.93 · 23.1% (28 of 121 decks)
- Sunscape Familiar relevance 0.91 · 18.2% (22 of 121 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 0.91 · 21.5% (26 of 121 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, All-Knowing relevance 0.90 · 16.5% (20 of 121 decks)
- Wall of Reverence relevance 0.90 · 21.5% (26 of 121 decks)
- Mnemonic Wall relevance 0.90 · 19.8% (24 of 121 decks)
- Wharf Infiltrator relevance 0.89 · 13.2% (16 of 121 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Ward of Bones relevance 1.04 · 16.5% (20 of 121 decks)
- Rammas Echor, Ancient Shield relevance 1.02 · 20.7% (25 of 121 decks)
- Vedalken Shackles relevance 1.01 · 14.9% (18 of 121 decks)
- Meekstone relevance 0.93 · 20.7% (25 of 121 decks)
All enchantments (7)
- High Alert relevance 1.50 · 29.8% (36 of 121 decks)
- Stoneskin relevance 1.09 · 19.8% (24 of 121 decks)
- Web of Inertia relevance 1.04 · 18.2% (22 of 121 decks)
- The Birth of Meletis relevance 0.92 · 16.5% (20 of 121 decks)
- Brave the Sands relevance 0.91 · 19.8% (24 of 121 decks)
- Worship relevance 0.90 · 14.0% (17 of 121 decks)
- War of the Last Alliance relevance 0.89 · 16.5% (20 of 121 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Retribution of the Meek relevance 1.05 · 15.7% (19 of 121 decks)
- Dusk // Dawn relevance 1.02 · 27.3% (33 of 121 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 1.02 · 19.0% (23 of 121 decks)
- Wave of Reckoning relevance 0.96 · 14.9% (18 of 121 decks)
- Acquire relevance 0.96 · 16.5% (20 of 121 decks)
- What Must Be Done relevance 0.90 · 14.9% (18 of 121 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Teyo, Geometric Tactician relevance 1.13 · 20.7% (25 of 121 decks)
- Will Kenrith relevance 0.89 · 13.2% (16 of 121 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Winding Canyons relevance 0.91 · 14.9% (18 of 121 decks)
All lands (1)
- Warped Landscape relevance 0.89 · 13.2% (16 of 121 decks)
EDH data for Wall of Nets: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 121 real decks.

















































