Scalding Tarn
Played in 15,876 Dimir decks
Color Identity Spread
2.6% Dimir
- Five-Color 90,388 · 14.8%
- Grixis 89,197 · 14.6%
- Izzet 74,156 · 12.1%
- Temur 55,009 · 9.0%
- Jeskai 53,591 · 8.8%
- Esper 23,701 · 3.9%
- Simic 20,168 · 3.3%
- Yore-Tiller 18,809 · 3.1%
- Rakdos 17,063 · 2.8%
- Sultai 16,808 · 2.7%
- Gruul 16,595 · 2.7%
- Dimir 15,876 · 2.6%
- Ink-Treader 14,786 · 2.4%
- Azorius 13,003 · 2.1%
- Blue 12,787 · 2.1%
- Jund 12,655 · 2.1%
- Bant 12,266 · 2.0%
- Mardu 12,243 · 2.0%
- Other (14) 42,590 · 7.0%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (30)
- Yuriko, the Tiger's Shadow relevance 2.15 · 21.3% (3,592 of 16,894 decks)
- Talion, the Kindly Lord relevance 2.01 · 26.1% (955 of 3,662 decks)
- Gyruda, Doom of Depths relevance 1.92 · 28.7% (522 of 1,820 decks)
- Superior Spider-Man relevance 1.49 · 24.5% (193 of 788 decks)
- Ertai Resurrected relevance 1.33 · 23.8% (114 of 478 decks)
- Vohar, Vodalian Desecrator relevance 1.14 · 16.5% (149 of 902 decks)
- Rona, Herald of Invasion // Rona, Tolarian Obliterator relevance 1.14 · 14.3% (227 of 1,585 decks)
- Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator relevance 1.08 · 14.2% (181 of 1,279 decks)
- Sygg, River Cutthroat relevance 1.03 · 13.5% (164 of 1,218 decks)
- Hidetsugu and Kairi relevance 1.02 · 11.8% (238 of 2,011 decks)
- Circu, Dimir Lobotomist relevance 1.00 · 17.0% (74 of 436 decks)
- Satoru, the Infiltrator relevance 0.98 · 13.2% (133 of 1,005 decks)
- Oskar, Rubbish Reclaimer relevance 0.97 · 11.6% (193 of 1,667 decks)
- Rusko, Clockmaker relevance 0.97 · 19.3% (47 of 243 decks)
- Emet-Selch, Unsundered // Hades, Sorcerer of Eld relevance 0.94 · 10.2% (259 of 2,533 decks)
- Nymris, Oona's Trickster relevance 0.93 · 13.1% (109 of 834 decks)
- Uldaros Theorix relevance 0.92 · 11.0% (177 of 1,614 decks)
- Tormod, the Desecrator // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.92 · 18.5% (42 of 227 decks)
- Lazav, the Multifarious relevance 0.87 · 11.9% (103 of 868 decks)
- Krang & Shredder relevance 0.81 · 11.0% (95 of 864 decks)
- Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher // Cultist of the Absolute relevance 0.80 · 30.0% (12 of 40 decks)
- Araumi of the Dead Tide relevance 0.78 · 8.5% (175 of 2,047 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept relevance 0.77 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Lord of the Nazgûl relevance 0.76 · 6.3% (547 of 8,684 decks)
- Golbez, Crystal Collector relevance 0.74 · 6.2% (511 of 8,303 decks)
- Basim Ibn Ishaq relevance 0.74 · 9.4% (99 of 1,050 decks)
- Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools // Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator relevance 0.74 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Seven of Nine relevance 0.73 · 14.6% (30 of 205 decks)
- Oura, the Imitator relevance 0.72 · 36.8% (7 of 19 decks)
- Satoru Umezawa relevance 0.70 · 5.8% (451 of 7,766 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Force of Negation relevance 1.26 · 51.7% (8,206 of 15,876 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 1.25 · 43.3% (6,873 of 15,876 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 1.23 · 47.0% (7,457 of 15,876 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 1.23 · 52.7% (8,362 of 15,876 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 1.13 · 39.5% (6,266 of 15,876 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 1.13 · 35.6% (5,644 of 15,876 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 1.13 · 36.7% (5,824 of 15,876 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 1.12 · 57.4% (9,115 of 15,876 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 1.08 · 32.0% (5,082 of 15,876 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 1.07 · 59.5% (9,443 of 15,876 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 1.07 · 55.0% (8,731 of 15,876 decks)
- Tainted Pact relevance 1.06 · 31.7% (5,031 of 15,876 decks)
- Orcish Bowmasters relevance 1.06 · 36.7% (5,833 of 15,876 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 1.03 · 37.6% (5,967 of 15,876 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 1.03 · 57.9% (9,199 of 15,876 decks)
- Demonic Consultation relevance 1.02 · 34.8% (5,529 of 15,876 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 1.02 · 30.6% (4,862 of 15,876 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 1.01 · 34.3% (5,441 of 15,876 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 1.00 · 47.0% (7,456 of 15,876 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.96 · 59.3% (9,411 of 15,876 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.94 · 59.1% (9,375 of 15,876 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.92 · 29.6% (4,697 of 15,876 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.90 · 28.9% (4,581 of 15,876 decks)
- Opposition Agent relevance 0.85 · 30.1% (4,771 of 15,876 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.83 · 26.9% (4,278 of 15,876 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.82 · 51.1% (8,107 of 15,876 decks)
- Snuff Out relevance 0.80 · 29.6% (4,703 of 15,876 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.79 · 23.3% (3,701 of 15,876 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.79 · 43.4% (6,890 of 15,876 decks)
- Lim-Dûl's Vault relevance 0.76 · 29.8% (4,734 of 15,876 decks)
All creatures (3)
- Orcish Bowmasters relevance 1.06 · 36.7% (5,833 of 15,876 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 1.03 · 37.6% (5,967 of 15,876 decks)
- Opposition Agent relevance 0.85 · 30.1% (4,771 of 15,876 decks)
All artifacts (7)
- Chrome Mox relevance 1.25 · 43.3% (6,873 of 15,876 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 1.23 · 47.0% (7,457 of 15,876 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 1.08 · 32.0% (5,082 of 15,876 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 1.01 · 34.3% (5,441 of 15,876 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.92 · 29.6% (4,697 of 15,876 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.79 · 23.3% (3,701 of 15,876 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.73 · 26.0% (4,121 of 15,876 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Mystic Remora relevance 1.07 · 55.0% (8,731 of 15,876 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.94 · 59.1% (9,375 of 15,876 decks)
All instants (18)
- Force of Negation relevance 1.26 · 51.7% (8,206 of 15,876 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 1.23 · 52.7% (8,362 of 15,876 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 1.13 · 39.5% (6,266 of 15,876 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 1.13 · 35.6% (5,644 of 15,876 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 1.12 · 57.4% (9,115 of 15,876 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 1.07 · 59.5% (9,443 of 15,876 decks)
- Tainted Pact relevance 1.06 · 31.7% (5,031 of 15,876 decks)
- Demonic Consultation relevance 1.02 · 34.8% (5,529 of 15,876 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 1.02 · 30.6% (4,862 of 15,876 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 1.00 · 47.0% (7,456 of 15,876 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.96 · 59.3% (9,411 of 15,876 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.90 · 28.9% (4,581 of 15,876 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.83 · 26.9% (4,278 of 15,876 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.82 · 51.1% (8,107 of 15,876 decks)
- Snuff Out relevance 0.80 · 29.6% (4,703 of 15,876 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.79 · 43.4% (6,890 of 15,876 decks)
- Lim-Dûl's Vault relevance 0.76 · 29.8% (4,734 of 15,876 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.76 · 24.6% (3,910 of 15,876 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Imperial Seal relevance 1.13 · 36.7% (5,824 of 15,876 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 1.03 · 57.9% (9,199 of 15,876 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 1.22 · 69.7% (11,063 of 15,876 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.93 · 58.0% (9,214 of 15,876 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.91 · 49.5% (7,860 of 15,876 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.80 · 27.9% (4,424 of 15,876 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.75 · 26.2% (4,161 of 15,876 decks)
All lands (13)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 2.23 · 85.6% (13,583 of 15,876 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 2.12 · 79.5% (12,625 of 15,876 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 2.11 · 84.5% (13,422 of 15,876 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 2.11 · 77.0% (12,223 of 15,876 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 2.09 · 80.5% (12,776 of 15,876 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 1.33 · 63.7% (10,106 of 15,876 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 1.27 · 40.8% (6,483 of 15,876 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 1.24 · 41.7% (6,618 of 15,876 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 1.17 · 40.7% (6,467 of 15,876 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 1.10 · 39.0% (6,187 of 15,876 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 1.03 · 39.6% (6,293 of 15,876 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.85 · 29.0% (4,602 of 15,876 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.77 · 26.0% (4,133 of 15,876 decks)
EDH data for Scalding Tarn: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 15,876 real decks.