Depths of Desire
Played in 144 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (8)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Sword Coast Sailor relevance 1.12 · 2.5% (4 of 160 decks)
- The Third Doctor relevance 1.02 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Moon Girl and Devil Dinosaur relevance 0.92 · 1.3% (4 of 315 decks)
- Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.83 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- The Third Doctor // K-9, Mark I relevance 0.67 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.57 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.53 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.42 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Crack Open relevance 1.73 · 27.8% (40 of 144 decks)
- Spell Swindle relevance 1.12 · 22.2% (32 of 144 decks)
- Bootleggers' Stash relevance 1.09 · 24.3% (35 of 144 decks)
- Collector's Vault relevance 0.89 · 13.9% (20 of 144 decks)
- City of Death relevance 0.80 · 16.7% (24 of 144 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.77 · 22.2% (32 of 144 decks)
- Gala Greeters relevance 0.71 · 16.0% (23 of 144 decks)
- Pawpatch Formation relevance 0.64 · 11.8% (17 of 144 decks)
- Prizefight relevance 0.63 · 10.4% (15 of 144 decks)
- Return from the Wilds relevance 0.55 · 9.7% (14 of 144 decks)
- Fae Offering relevance 0.54 · 9.0% (13 of 144 decks)
- Nuka-Cola Vending Machine relevance 0.54 · 11.1% (16 of 144 decks)
- Confirm Suspicions relevance 0.52 · 9.0% (13 of 144 decks)
- Gilded Goose relevance 0.52 · 13.2% (19 of 144 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.50 · 13.9% (20 of 144 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.49 · 22.9% (33 of 144 decks)
- Deduce relevance 0.49 · 10.4% (15 of 144 decks)
- Access Denied relevance 0.46 · 8.3% (12 of 144 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.46 · 16.0% (23 of 144 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.45 · 16.7% (24 of 144 decks)
- Tempting Contract relevance 0.45 · 6.9% (10 of 144 decks)
- Peregrin Took relevance 0.45 · 11.8% (17 of 144 decks)
- Root Out relevance 0.45 · 7.6% (11 of 144 decks)
- Prosperous Innkeeper relevance 0.45 · 11.1% (16 of 144 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.44 · 14.6% (21 of 144 decks)
- Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator relevance 0.44 · 6.9% (10 of 144 decks)
- Awakening Zone relevance 0.43 · 9.7% (14 of 144 decks)
- Aether Mutation relevance 0.41 · 6.9% (10 of 144 decks)
- Dive Down relevance 0.41 · 7.6% (11 of 144 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.41 · 14.6% (21 of 144 decks)
All creatures (12)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.77 · 22.2% (32 of 144 decks)
- Gala Greeters relevance 0.71 · 16.0% (23 of 144 decks)
- Gilded Goose relevance 0.52 · 13.2% (19 of 144 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.49 · 22.9% (33 of 144 decks)
- Peregrin Took relevance 0.45 · 11.8% (17 of 144 decks)
- Prosperous Innkeeper relevance 0.45 · 11.1% (16 of 144 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.44 · 14.6% (21 of 144 decks)
- Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator relevance 0.44 · 6.9% (10 of 144 decks)
- Reef Worm relevance 0.38 · 10.4% (15 of 144 decks)
- Junk Winder relevance 0.35 · 11.8% (17 of 144 decks)
- Arasta of the Endless Web relevance 0.35 · 7.6% (11 of 144 decks)
- Tempest Caller relevance 0.34 · 7.6% (11 of 144 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Bootleggers' Stash relevance 1.09 · 24.3% (35 of 144 decks)
- Collector's Vault relevance 0.89 · 13.9% (20 of 144 decks)
- Nuka-Cola Vending Machine relevance 0.54 · 11.1% (16 of 144 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.50 · 13.9% (20 of 144 decks)
- Tempting Contract relevance 0.45 · 6.9% (10 of 144 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- City of Death relevance 0.80 · 16.7% (24 of 144 decks)
- Fae Offering relevance 0.54 · 9.0% (13 of 144 decks)
- Awakening Zone relevance 0.43 · 9.7% (14 of 144 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.37 · 12.5% (18 of 144 decks)
All instants (14)
- Spell Swindle relevance 1.12 · 22.2% (32 of 144 decks)
- Pawpatch Formation relevance 0.64 · 11.8% (17 of 144 decks)
- Prizefight relevance 0.63 · 10.4% (15 of 144 decks)
- Confirm Suspicions relevance 0.52 · 9.0% (13 of 144 decks)
- Deduce relevance 0.49 · 10.4% (15 of 144 decks)
- Access Denied relevance 0.46 · 8.3% (12 of 144 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.46 · 16.0% (23 of 144 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.45 · 16.7% (24 of 144 decks)
- Dive Down relevance 0.41 · 7.6% (11 of 144 decks)
- Theoretical Duplication relevance 0.39 · 9.0% (13 of 144 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.36 · 9.0% (13 of 144 decks)
- Supplant Form relevance 0.35 · 5.6% (8 of 144 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.34 · 8.3% (12 of 144 decks)
- Seedship Impact relevance 0.34 · 6.3% (9 of 144 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Crack Open relevance 1.73 · 27.8% (40 of 144 decks)
- Return from the Wilds relevance 0.55 · 9.7% (14 of 144 decks)
- Root Out relevance 0.45 · 7.6% (11 of 144 decks)
- Aether Mutation relevance 0.41 · 6.9% (10 of 144 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.41 · 14.6% (21 of 144 decks)
- They Went This Way relevance 0.39 · 6.9% (10 of 144 decks)
- Spider Food relevance 0.38 · 6.3% (9 of 144 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Fountainport relevance 0.62 · 13.9% (20 of 144 decks)
- Kitchen relevance 0.43 · 9.0% (13 of 144 decks)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.41 · 11.1% (16 of 144 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.38 · 11.8% (17 of 144 decks)
- Gingerbread Cabin relevance 0.37 · 7.6% (11 of 144 decks)
All lands (3)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.48 · 24.3% (35 of 144 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.48 · 29.9% (43 of 144 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.38 · 14.6% (21 of 144 decks)
EDH data for Depths of Desire: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 144 real decks.