Lotus Ring
Played in 102 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
2.0% Gruul
- Five-Color 617 · 12.3%
- Boros 560 · 11.2%
- White 365 · 7.3%
- Jeskai 326 · 6.5%
- Naya 317 · 6.3%
- Red 269 · 5.4%
- Blue 227 · 4.5%
- Esper 218 · 4.3%
- Black 211 · 4.2%
- Rakdos 209 · 4.2%
- Mardu 183 · 3.7%
- Orzhov 171 · 3.4%
- Golgari 134 · 2.7%
- Grixis 129 · 2.6%
- Izzet 113 · 2.3%
- Green 113 · 2.3%
- Sultai 109 · 2.2%
- Azorius 102 · 2.0%
- Gruul 102 · 2.0%
- Other (13) 537 · 10.7%
All commanders (4)
- Barret, Avalanche Leader relevance 1.32 · 1.8% (6 of 327 decks)
- Sunastian Falconer relevance 0.47 · 1.8% (1 of 55 decks)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.46 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Jerrard of the Closed Fist relevance 0.44 · 1.4% (1 of 69 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.79 · 21.6% (22 of 102 decks)
- Colossus Hammer relevance 0.64 · 12.7% (13 of 102 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.62 · 14.7% (15 of 102 decks)
- Leyline Axe relevance 0.59 · 12.7% (13 of 102 decks)
- Argentum Armor relevance 0.59 · 9.8% (10 of 102 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.57 · 19.6% (20 of 102 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.56 · 13.7% (14 of 102 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.55 · 44.1% (45 of 102 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.54 · 14.7% (15 of 102 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.54 · 17.6% (18 of 102 decks)
- Bloodforged Battle-Axe relevance 0.53 · 11.8% (12 of 102 decks)
- Chainsaw relevance 0.53 · 10.8% (11 of 102 decks)
- Forebear's Blade relevance 0.52 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.50 · 11.8% (12 of 102 decks)
- Reach for the Sky relevance 0.49 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.49 · 14.7% (15 of 102 decks)
- Belt of Giant Strength relevance 0.48 · 9.8% (10 of 102 decks)
- Adaptive Omnitool relevance 0.48 · 9.8% (10 of 102 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.48 · 16.7% (17 of 102 decks)
- Sword of Vengeance relevance 0.48 · 10.8% (11 of 102 decks)
- Conqueror's Flail relevance 0.47 · 9.8% (10 of 102 decks)
- The Spear of Leonidas relevance 0.47 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Conformer Shuriken relevance 0.47 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Barrow-Blade relevance 0.47 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Mage Slayer relevance 0.46 · 15.7% (16 of 102 decks)
- Hammer of Nazahn relevance 0.46 · 10.8% (11 of 102 decks)
- Wrecking Ball Arm relevance 0.45 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.45 · 10.8% (11 of 102 decks)
- Lizard Blades relevance 0.45 · 12.7% (13 of 102 decks)
- Firion, Wild Rose Warrior relevance 0.45 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
All creatures (3)
- Lizard Blades relevance 0.45 · 12.7% (13 of 102 decks)
- Firion, Wild Rose Warrior relevance 0.45 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Sunset Strikemaster relevance 0.43 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
All artifacts (42)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.79 · 21.6% (22 of 102 decks)
- Colossus Hammer relevance 0.64 · 12.7% (13 of 102 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.62 · 14.7% (15 of 102 decks)
- Leyline Axe relevance 0.59 · 12.7% (13 of 102 decks)
- Argentum Armor relevance 0.59 · 9.8% (10 of 102 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.57 · 19.6% (20 of 102 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.56 · 13.7% (14 of 102 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.55 · 44.1% (45 of 102 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.54 · 14.7% (15 of 102 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.54 · 17.6% (18 of 102 decks)
- Bloodforged Battle-Axe relevance 0.53 · 11.8% (12 of 102 decks)
- Chainsaw relevance 0.53 · 10.8% (11 of 102 decks)
- Forebear's Blade relevance 0.52 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.50 · 11.8% (12 of 102 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.49 · 14.7% (15 of 102 decks)
- Belt of Giant Strength relevance 0.48 · 9.8% (10 of 102 decks)
- Adaptive Omnitool relevance 0.48 · 9.8% (10 of 102 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.48 · 16.7% (17 of 102 decks)
- Sword of Vengeance relevance 0.48 · 10.8% (11 of 102 decks)
- Conqueror's Flail relevance 0.47 · 9.8% (10 of 102 decks)
- The Spear of Leonidas relevance 0.47 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Conformer Shuriken relevance 0.47 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Barrow-Blade relevance 0.47 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Mage Slayer relevance 0.46 · 15.7% (16 of 102 decks)
- Hammer of Nazahn relevance 0.46 · 10.8% (11 of 102 decks)
- Wrecking Ball Arm relevance 0.45 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.45 · 10.8% (11 of 102 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.45 · 13.7% (14 of 102 decks)
- Beamtown Beatstick relevance 0.44 · 9.8% (10 of 102 decks)
- Diamond Pick-Axe relevance 0.44 · 10.8% (11 of 102 decks)
- Tarrian's Soulcleaver relevance 0.44 · 11.8% (12 of 102 decks)
- Masterwork of Ingenuity relevance 0.44 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Mask of Memory relevance 0.42 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.42 · 10.8% (11 of 102 decks)
- Dragonfire Blade relevance 0.42 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Fireshrieker relevance 0.41 · 9.8% (10 of 102 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.40 · 25.5% (26 of 102 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.40 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Thran Power Suit relevance 0.39 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.38 · 12.7% (13 of 102 decks)
- Two-Handed Axe // Sweeping Cleave relevance 0.38 · 9.8% (10 of 102 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.37 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Reach for the Sky relevance 0.49 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.39 · 9.8% (10 of 102 decks)
All lands (3)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.56 · 24.5% (25 of 102 decks)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 0.39 · 10.8% (11 of 102 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.38 · 24.5% (25 of 102 decks)
EDH data for Lotus Ring: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 102 real decks.