Suq'Ata Firewalker
Played in 58 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
6.4% Azorius
630+30+2+8+5+3+2+
That's every commander.
All commanders (6)
- The Fifth Doctor // Adric, Mathematical Genius relevance 2.12 · 10.7% (6 of 56 decks)
- Niambi, Faithful Healer relevance 0.98 · 3.8% (2 of 53 decks)
- The Fifth Doctor // Sarah Jane Smith relevance 0.90 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Clan Crafter // Lulu, Loyal Hollyphant relevance 0.61 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Nardole, Resourceful Cyborg // The Fifth Doctor relevance 0.58 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Clara Oswald // The Fifth Doctor relevance 0.46 · 1.1% (1 of 93 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Prodigal Sorcerer relevance 5.34 · 81.0% (47 of 58 decks)
- Tandem Lookout relevance 2.43 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Archivist relevance 2.38 · 41.4% (24 of 58 decks)
- Ophidian Eye relevance 2.34 · 37.9% (22 of 58 decks)
- Sea Scryer relevance 2.20 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Aphetto Alchemist relevance 2.13 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
- Energy Arc relevance 2.12 · 37.9% (22 of 58 decks)
- To Arms! relevance 2.10 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
- Thought Courier relevance 2.05 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
- Swans of Bryn Argoll relevance 2.04 · 39.7% (23 of 58 decks)
- Thraben Doomsayer relevance 2.02 · 31.0% (18 of 58 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 2.00 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
- Sigil of Sleep relevance 1.94 · 31.0% (18 of 58 decks)
- Arcanis the Omnipotent relevance 1.93 · 44.8% (26 of 58 decks)
- Disruptive Pitmage relevance 1.88 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 1.88 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
- Gideon, Martial Paragon relevance 1.87 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 1.85 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
- Disruptive Student relevance 1.85 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Soul Barrier relevance 1.84 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Merfolk Looter relevance 1.83 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Teferi's Veil relevance 1.79 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Jace, Ingenious Mind-Mage relevance 1.78 · 31.0% (18 of 58 decks)
- Squeeze relevance 1.78 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Textbook Tabulator relevance 1.78 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Summit Sentinel relevance 1.78 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Test of Talents relevance 1.76 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Enclave Cryptologist relevance 1.75 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Thassa's Rebuff relevance 1.75 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Scuttlemutt relevance 1.74 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
All creatures (30)
- Prodigal Sorcerer relevance 5.34 · 81.0% (47 of 58 decks)
- Tandem Lookout relevance 2.43 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Archivist relevance 2.38 · 41.4% (24 of 58 decks)
- Sea Scryer relevance 2.20 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Aphetto Alchemist relevance 2.13 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
- Thought Courier relevance 2.05 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
- Swans of Bryn Argoll relevance 2.04 · 39.7% (23 of 58 decks)
- Thraben Doomsayer relevance 2.02 · 31.0% (18 of 58 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 2.00 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
- Arcanis the Omnipotent relevance 1.93 · 44.8% (26 of 58 decks)
- Disruptive Pitmage relevance 1.88 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Disruptive Student relevance 1.85 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Merfolk Looter relevance 1.83 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Textbook Tabulator relevance 1.78 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Summit Sentinel relevance 1.78 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Enclave Cryptologist relevance 1.75 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Scuttlemutt relevance 1.74 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Elite Arcanist relevance 1.73 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 1.73 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
- Fatestitcher relevance 1.72 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Tideforce Elemental relevance 1.70 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- The Eighth Doctor relevance 1.70 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Intrepid Hero relevance 1.69 · 31.0% (18 of 58 decks)
- Reckless Scholar relevance 1.69 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher relevance 1.68 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Stonybrook Angler relevance 1.67 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Tradewind Rider relevance 1.67 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Tenacious Tomeseeker relevance 1.66 · 24.1% (14 of 58 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 1.64 · 24.1% (14 of 58 decks)
- Surtland Elementalist relevance 1.64 · 24.1% (14 of 58 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 1.88 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
- Sword of the Chosen relevance 1.64 · 24.1% (14 of 58 decks)
All enchantments (8)
- Ophidian Eye relevance 2.34 · 37.9% (22 of 58 decks)
- Sigil of Sleep relevance 1.94 · 31.0% (18 of 58 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 1.85 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
- Soul Barrier relevance 1.84 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Teferi's Veil relevance 1.79 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Squeeze relevance 1.78 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Tamiyo Meets the Story Circle relevance 1.69 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 1.69 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
All instants (5)
- Energy Arc relevance 2.12 · 37.9% (22 of 58 decks)
- To Arms! relevance 2.10 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
- Test of Talents relevance 1.76 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Thassa's Rebuff relevance 1.75 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Thassa's Intervention relevance 1.64 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Subjugate the Hobbits relevance 1.71 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Taigam's Scheming relevance 1.69 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Trade the Helm relevance 1.66 · 24.1% (14 of 58 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Gideon, Martial Paragon relevance 1.87 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Jace, Ingenious Mind-Mage relevance 1.78 · 31.0% (18 of 58 decks)
EDH data for Suq'Ata Firewalker: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 58 real decks.
















































