Needlebite Trap
Played in 114 Grixis decks
530+20+1+5+15+7+2+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Vial Smasher the Fierce // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces 3.2% of decks
Vial Smasher the Fierce // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces 3.2% of decks
Vial Smasher the Fierce // Esior, Wardwing Familiar 7.5% of decks
Vial Smasher the Fierce // Esior, Wardwing Familiar 7.5% of decks
Vial Smasher the Fierce // Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist 1.3% of decks
Vial Smasher the Fierce // Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist 1.3% of decks
Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist 2.6% of decks
Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist 2.6% of decks
Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Vial Smasher the Fierce 1.6% of decks
Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Vial Smasher the Fierce 1.6% of decks
Most Relevant
Runeflare Trap 43.0% of decks
Runeflare Trap 43.0% of decks
Shadow of Mortality 29.8% of decks
Shadow of Mortality 29.8% of decks
Archive Trap 28.1% of decks
Archive Trap 28.1% of decks
Curtains' Call 28.1% of decks
Curtains' Call 28.1% of decks
Dig Through Time 36.8% of decks
Dig Through Time 36.8% of decks
Treasure Cruise 32.5% of decks
Treasure Cruise 32.5% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (5)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 3.09 · 3.2% (39 of 1,227 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 2.19 · 7.5% (8 of 106 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist relevance 1.08 · 1.3% (4 of 308 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist relevance 0.55 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Vial Smasher the Fierce relevance 0.49 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Runeflare Trap relevance 2.93 · 43.0% (49 of 114 decks)
- Shadow of Mortality relevance 1.87 · 29.8% (34 of 114 decks)
- Archive Trap relevance 1.67 · 28.1% (32 of 114 decks)
- Curtains' Call relevance 1.34 · 28.1% (32 of 114 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 1.23 · 36.8% (42 of 114 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 1.21 · 32.5% (37 of 114 decks)
- Chandra's Incinerator relevance 1.01 · 16.7% (19 of 114 decks)
- Obosh, the Preypiercer relevance 0.96 · 16.7% (19 of 114 decks)
- Ricochet Trap relevance 0.96 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Submerge relevance 0.94 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.87 · 14.9% (17 of 114 decks)
- Kaervek the Merciless relevance 0.87 · 17.5% (20 of 114 decks)
- Divergent Transformations relevance 0.81 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- Volcanic Salvo relevance 0.81 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Snuff Out relevance 0.78 · 21.9% (25 of 114 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.76 · 22.8% (26 of 114 decks)
- Blood for the Blood God! relevance 0.76 · 19.3% (22 of 114 decks)
- Stunt Double relevance 0.75 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Cormela, Glamour Thief relevance 0.70 · 21.1% (24 of 114 decks)
- Undercover Operative relevance 0.69 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- Quasiduplicate relevance 0.69 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- The Lord of Pain relevance 0.69 · 14.9% (17 of 114 decks)
- Mirror Image relevance 0.68 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.67 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.64 · 20.2% (23 of 114 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.64 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Sygg, River Cutthroat relevance 0.62 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.62 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.61 · 19.3% (22 of 114 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.61 · 14.9% (17 of 114 decks)
All creatures (20)
- Shadow of Mortality relevance 1.87 · 29.8% (34 of 114 decks)
- Chandra's Incinerator relevance 1.01 · 16.7% (19 of 114 decks)
- Obosh, the Preypiercer relevance 0.96 · 16.7% (19 of 114 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.87 · 14.9% (17 of 114 decks)
- Kaervek the Merciless relevance 0.87 · 17.5% (20 of 114 decks)
- Stunt Double relevance 0.75 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Cormela, Glamour Thief relevance 0.70 · 21.1% (24 of 114 decks)
- Undercover Operative relevance 0.69 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- The Lord of Pain relevance 0.69 · 14.9% (17 of 114 decks)
- Mirror Image relevance 0.68 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- Sygg, River Cutthroat relevance 0.62 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.62 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.61 · 19.3% (22 of 114 decks)
- Goblin Electromancer relevance 0.58 · 23.7% (27 of 114 decks)
- Shriekmaw relevance 0.55 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Evil Twin relevance 0.55 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Sin Prodder relevance 0.54 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Phantasmal Image relevance 0.54 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Keen Duelist relevance 0.53 · 11.4% (13 of 114 decks)
- Dack's Duplicate relevance 0.53 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.56 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.67 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.64 · 20.2% (23 of 114 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.59 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Protection Racket relevance 0.58 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- City on Fire relevance 0.54 · 11.4% (13 of 114 decks)
All instants (15)
- Runeflare Trap relevance 2.93 · 43.0% (49 of 114 decks)
- Archive Trap relevance 1.67 · 28.1% (32 of 114 decks)
- Curtains' Call relevance 1.34 · 28.1% (32 of 114 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 1.23 · 36.8% (42 of 114 decks)
- Ricochet Trap relevance 0.96 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Submerge relevance 0.94 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Divergent Transformations relevance 0.81 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- Snuff Out relevance 0.78 · 21.9% (25 of 114 decks)
- Blood for the Blood God! relevance 0.76 · 19.3% (22 of 114 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.64 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Murderous Cut relevance 0.58 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.58 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- Risk Factor relevance 0.55 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Pyrokinesis relevance 0.54 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.52 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 1.21 · 32.5% (37 of 114 decks)
- Volcanic Salvo relevance 0.81 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.76 · 22.8% (26 of 114 decks)
- Quasiduplicate relevance 0.69 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.61 · 14.9% (17 of 114 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.54 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Cruel Ultimatum relevance 0.51 · 14.9% (17 of 114 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.96 · 23.7% (27 of 114 decks)
- Bloodsoaked Insight // Sanguine Morass relevance 0.65 · 16.7% (19 of 114 decks)
EDH data for Needlebite Trap: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 114 real decks.















































