Flame Lash
Played in 43 Gruul decks
130+19+3+6+7+7+1+5+2+
Color Identity Spread
3.1% Gruul
-
Izzet 507 · 36.4%
-
Red 400 · 28.7%
-
Rakdos 109 · 7.8%
-
Grixis 96 · 6.9%
-
Boros 85 · 6.1%
-
Gruul 43 · 3.1%
-
Jeskai 37 · 2.7%
- Other (10) 115 · 8.3%
Commanders
Most Relevant
Quaketusk Boar 25.6% of decks
Quaketusk Boar 25.6% of decks
Teapot Slinger 44.2% of decks
Teapot Slinger 44.2% of decks
Rust-Shield Rampager 32.6% of decks
Rust-Shield Rampager 32.6% of decks
Take Out the Trash 30.2% of decks
Take Out the Trash 30.2% of decks
Raccoon Rallier 32.6% of decks
Raccoon Rallier 32.6% of decks
Byway Barterer 32.6% of decks
Byway Barterer 32.6% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Strider, Ranger of the North relevance 0.59 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Quaketusk Boar relevance 1.59 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Teapot Slinger relevance 1.47 · 44.2% (19 of 43 decks)
- Rust-Shield Rampager relevance 1.43 · 32.6% (14 of 43 decks)
- Take Out the Trash relevance 1.39 · 30.2% (13 of 43 decks)
- Raccoon Rallier relevance 1.39 · 32.6% (14 of 43 decks)
- Byway Barterer relevance 1.38 · 32.6% (14 of 43 decks)
- Brambleguard Veteran relevance 1.37 · 32.6% (14 of 43 decks)
- Bakersbane Duo relevance 1.36 · 30.2% (13 of 43 decks)
- Pawpatch Formation relevance 1.36 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Junkblade Bruiser relevance 1.31 · 30.2% (13 of 43 decks)
- Rabid Bite relevance 1.29 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Bark-Knuckle Boxer relevance 1.29 · 30.2% (13 of 43 decks)
- Colossification relevance 1.28 · 30.2% (13 of 43 decks)
- Roughshod Duo relevance 1.28 · 30.2% (13 of 43 decks)
- Scrapshooter relevance 1.27 · 32.6% (14 of 43 decks)
- Rabid Gnaw relevance 1.20 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- War Squeak relevance 1.17 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Playful Shove relevance 1.17 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Agate Assault relevance 1.15 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 1.14 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- Keen-Eyed Curator relevance 1.14 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- Hivespine Wolverine relevance 1.13 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Valley Mightcaller relevance 1.13 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Brazen Collector relevance 1.09 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 1.05 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- Fecund Greenshell relevance 1.02 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Wandertale Mentor relevance 1.01 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Wear Down relevance 1.01 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
- Hoarder's Overflow relevance 0.85 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Hugs, Grisly Guardian relevance 0.84 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Quaketusk Boar relevance 1.59 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Teapot Slinger relevance 1.47 · 44.2% (19 of 43 decks)
- Rust-Shield Rampager relevance 1.43 · 32.6% (14 of 43 decks)
- Raccoon Rallier relevance 1.39 · 32.6% (14 of 43 decks)
- Byway Barterer relevance 1.38 · 32.6% (14 of 43 decks)
- Brambleguard Veteran relevance 1.37 · 32.6% (14 of 43 decks)
- Bakersbane Duo relevance 1.36 · 30.2% (13 of 43 decks)
- Junkblade Bruiser relevance 1.31 · 30.2% (13 of 43 decks)
- Bark-Knuckle Boxer relevance 1.29 · 30.2% (13 of 43 decks)
- Roughshod Duo relevance 1.28 · 30.2% (13 of 43 decks)
- Scrapshooter relevance 1.27 · 32.6% (14 of 43 decks)
- Keen-Eyed Curator relevance 1.14 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- Hivespine Wolverine relevance 1.13 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Valley Mightcaller relevance 1.13 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Brazen Collector relevance 1.09 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Fecund Greenshell relevance 1.02 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Wandertale Mentor relevance 1.01 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Hugs, Grisly Guardian relevance 0.84 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.43 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.53 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.50 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.45 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Colossification relevance 1.28 · 30.2% (13 of 43 decks)
- War Squeak relevance 1.17 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 1.05 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- Hoarder's Overflow relevance 0.85 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.73 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- Warstorm Surge relevance 0.58 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
All instants (7)
- Take Out the Trash relevance 1.39 · 30.2% (13 of 43 decks)
- Pawpatch Formation relevance 1.36 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Rabid Gnaw relevance 1.20 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 1.14 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- Peerless Recycling relevance 0.83 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.59 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.51 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Rabid Bite relevance 1.29 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Playful Shove relevance 1.17 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Agate Assault relevance 1.15 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Wear Down relevance 1.01 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.59 · 30.2% (13 of 43 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.52 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- Decimate relevance 0.45 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Domri, Anarch of Bolas relevance 0.55 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Rockface Village relevance 1.49 · 32.6% (14 of 43 decks)
- Oakhollow Village relevance 1.27 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.74 · 32.6% (14 of 43 decks)
- Sheltered Thicket relevance 0.45 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- Raging Ravine relevance 0.44 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
All lands (2)
- Uncharted Haven relevance 1.13 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Wooded Ridgeline relevance 0.68 · 30.2% (13 of 43 decks)
EDH data for Flame Lash: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 43 real decks.














































