The Misty Mountains Cold
Played in 644 Mardu decks
430+27+4+8+4+4+3+
Color Identity Spread
3.1% Mardu
Commanders
Most Relevant
Smaug, Wicked Worm 52.3% of decks
Smaug, Wicked Worm 52.3% of decks
Smaug the Magnificent 49.8% of decks
Smaug the Magnificent 49.8% of decks
Gleaming Splendor 42.1% of decks
Gleaming Splendor 42.1% of decks
Smaug the Impenetrable 22.0% of decks
Smaug the Impenetrable 22.0% of decks
Orcrist, Goblin-cleaver 23.1% of decks
Orcrist, Goblin-cleaver 23.1% of decks
Monologue Tax 36.0% of decks
Monologue Tax 36.0% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (4)
- Vihaan, Goldwaker relevance 2.90 · 4.1% (247 of 6,018 decks)
- Ghen, Arcanum Weaver relevance 1.43 · 1.9% (37 of 1,971 decks)
- Jan Jansen, Chaos Crafter relevance 1.27 · 1.4% (40 of 2,925 decks)
- Thorna and Twigtooth relevance 0.49 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Smaug, Wicked Worm relevance 2.13 · 52.3% (337 of 644 decks)
- Smaug the Magnificent relevance 2.08 · 49.8% (321 of 644 decks)
- Gleaming Splendor relevance 1.49 · 42.1% (271 of 644 decks)
- Smaug the Impenetrable relevance 1.19 · 22.0% (142 of 644 decks)
- Orcrist, Goblin-cleaver relevance 1.16 · 23.1% (149 of 644 decks)
- Monologue Tax relevance 1.13 · 36.0% (232 of 644 decks)
- Xorn relevance 1.11 · 42.9% (276 of 644 decks)
- Goldspan Dragon relevance 1.09 · 47.0% (303 of 644 decks)
- Blood Money relevance 1.07 · 30.3% (195 of 644 decks)
- Rain of Riches relevance 0.99 · 30.1% (194 of 644 decks)
- There and Back Again relevance 0.96 · 19.1% (123 of 644 decks)
- Big Score relevance 0.94 · 44.4% (286 of 644 decks)
- Unexpected Windfall relevance 0.93 · 30.7% (198 of 644 decks)
- Revel in Riches relevance 0.88 · 30.6% (197 of 644 decks)
- The Sackville-Bagginses relevance 0.86 · 15.8% (102 of 644 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.86 · 33.2% (214 of 644 decks)
- Alchemist's Talent relevance 0.85 · 23.9% (154 of 644 decks)
- Brass's Bounty relevance 0.84 · 20.8% (134 of 644 decks)
- Cavern-Hoard Dragon relevance 0.84 · 20.0% (129 of 644 decks)
- Seize the Spoils relevance 0.82 · 22.2% (143 of 644 decks)
- Magda, Brazen Outlaw relevance 0.79 · 26.6% (171 of 644 decks)
- Jan Jansen, Chaos Crafter relevance 0.79 · 27.5% (177 of 644 decks)
- Mahadi, Emporium Master relevance 0.78 · 30.0% (193 of 644 decks)
- Grim Hireling relevance 0.76 · 26.6% (171 of 644 decks)
- Olivia, Opulent Outlaw relevance 0.76 · 22.0% (142 of 644 decks)
- Thorin Oakenshield relevance 0.75 · 11.6% (75 of 644 decks)
- Generous Plunderer relevance 0.74 · 21.4% (138 of 644 decks)
- Dáin, Lord of the Iron Hills relevance 0.73 · 11.2% (72 of 644 decks)
- Mirkwood Bats relevance 0.73 · 38.8% (250 of 644 decks)
- Descent into Avernus relevance 0.71 · 19.7% (127 of 644 decks)
All creatures (27)
- Smaug, Wicked Worm relevance 2.13 · 52.3% (337 of 644 decks)
- Smaug the Magnificent relevance 2.08 · 49.8% (321 of 644 decks)
- Smaug the Impenetrable relevance 1.19 · 22.0% (142 of 644 decks)
- Xorn relevance 1.11 · 42.9% (276 of 644 decks)
- Goldspan Dragon relevance 1.09 · 47.0% (303 of 644 decks)
- The Sackville-Bagginses relevance 0.86 · 15.8% (102 of 644 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.86 · 33.2% (214 of 644 decks)
- Cavern-Hoard Dragon relevance 0.84 · 20.0% (129 of 644 decks)
- Magda, Brazen Outlaw relevance 0.79 · 26.6% (171 of 644 decks)
- Jan Jansen, Chaos Crafter relevance 0.79 · 27.5% (177 of 644 decks)
- Mahadi, Emporium Master relevance 0.78 · 30.0% (193 of 644 decks)
- Grim Hireling relevance 0.76 · 26.6% (171 of 644 decks)
- Olivia, Opulent Outlaw relevance 0.76 · 22.0% (142 of 644 decks)
- Thorin Oakenshield relevance 0.75 · 11.6% (75 of 644 decks)
- Generous Plunderer relevance 0.74 · 21.4% (138 of 644 decks)
- Dáin, Lord of the Iron Hills relevance 0.73 · 11.2% (72 of 644 decks)
- Mirkwood Bats relevance 0.73 · 38.8% (250 of 644 decks)
- Magda, the Hoardmaster relevance 0.69 · 16.9% (109 of 644 decks)
- Professional Face-Breaker relevance 0.68 · 37.9% (244 of 644 decks)
- Lotho, Corrupt Shirriff relevance 0.68 · 33.5% (216 of 644 decks)
- Captain Lannery Storm relevance 0.65 · 24.7% (159 of 644 decks)
- Mari, the Killing Quill relevance 0.65 · 21.7% (140 of 644 decks)
- Reckless Fireweaver relevance 0.64 · 22.0% (142 of 644 decks)
- Glóin, Dwarf Emissary relevance 0.63 · 14.1% (91 of 644 decks)
- Kellogg, Dangerous Mind relevance 0.63 · 25.0% (161 of 644 decks)
- Hellkite Tyrant relevance 0.63 · 21.4% (138 of 644 decks)
- Belladonna Took relevance 0.62 · 14.9% (96 of 644 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Orcrist, Goblin-cleaver relevance 1.16 · 23.1% (149 of 644 decks)
- The Arkenstone // Seek the Heart relevance 0.65 · 12.4% (80 of 644 decks)
- The Reaver Cleaver relevance 0.59 · 19.9% (128 of 644 decks)
- Diamond Pick-Axe relevance 0.59 · 16.9% (109 of 644 decks)
All enchantments (8)
- Gleaming Splendor relevance 1.49 · 42.1% (271 of 644 decks)
- Monologue Tax relevance 1.13 · 36.0% (232 of 644 decks)
- Rain of Riches relevance 0.99 · 30.1% (194 of 644 decks)
- There and Back Again relevance 0.96 · 19.1% (123 of 644 decks)
- Revel in Riches relevance 0.88 · 30.6% (197 of 644 decks)
- Alchemist's Talent relevance 0.85 · 23.9% (154 of 644 decks)
- Descent into Avernus relevance 0.71 · 19.7% (127 of 644 decks)
- Spiteful Banditry relevance 0.60 · 14.4% (93 of 644 decks)
All instants (4)
- Big Score relevance 0.94 · 44.4% (286 of 644 decks)
- Unexpected Windfall relevance 0.93 · 30.7% (198 of 644 decks)
- Deadly Dispute relevance 0.70 · 45.5% (293 of 644 decks)
- Bilbo's Gambit relevance 0.68 · 14.1% (91 of 644 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Blood Money relevance 1.07 · 30.3% (195 of 644 decks)
- Brass's Bounty relevance 0.84 · 20.8% (134 of 644 decks)
- Seize the Spoils relevance 0.82 · 22.2% (143 of 644 decks)
- Hit the Mother Lode relevance 0.60 · 12.9% (83 of 644 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Dragon-Cursed Halls relevance 1.36 · 24.2% (156 of 644 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 1.08 · 34.2% (220 of 644 decks)
- Mines of Moria relevance 0.86 · 25.2% (162 of 644 decks)
EDH data for The Misty Mountains Cold: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 644 real decks.












































