Withstand Death
Played in 164 Jund decks
Color Identity Spread
2.6% Jund
All commanders (7)
- Darigaaz Reincarnated relevance 0.80 · 1.8% (3 of 168 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.54 · 1.1% (2 of 181 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.52 · 4.5% (1 of 22 decks)
- Tana, the Bloodsower // Sengir, the Dark Baron relevance 0.47 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.39 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 0.38 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 0.37 · 1.4% (1 of 74 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 1.31 · 35.4% (58 of 164 decks)
- Blossoming Defense relevance 1.03 · 19.5% (32 of 164 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.99 · 32.3% (53 of 164 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.92 · 26.2% (43 of 164 decks)
- Ranger's Guile relevance 0.79 · 12.2% (20 of 164 decks)
- Armor of Shadows relevance 0.76 · 12.2% (20 of 164 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.72 · 20.7% (34 of 164 decks)
- Rakdos Signet relevance 0.72 · 24.4% (40 of 164 decks)
- Prizefight relevance 0.68 · 17.7% (29 of 164 decks)
- Rush of Vitality relevance 0.67 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.63 · 12.8% (21 of 164 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.61 · 34.1% (56 of 164 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.60 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.59 · 12.8% (21 of 164 decks)
- Gruul Signet relevance 0.59 · 20.1% (33 of 164 decks)
- Brash Taunter relevance 0.57 · 17.1% (28 of 164 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.56 · 29.9% (49 of 164 decks)
- Fling relevance 0.55 · 18.3% (30 of 164 decks)
- Unleash Fury relevance 0.54 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Goblin Anarchomancer relevance 0.54 · 21.3% (35 of 164 decks)
- Golgari Signet relevance 0.54 · 18.9% (31 of 164 decks)
- Temur Battle Rage relevance 0.53 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Ancient Animus relevance 0.53 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.53 · 36.6% (60 of 164 decks)
- Savage Punch relevance 0.52 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Cosmic Hunger relevance 0.52 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.52 · 26.2% (43 of 164 decks)
- Mr. Orfeo, the Boulder relevance 0.51 · 15.2% (25 of 164 decks)
- Flame Rift relevance 0.51 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.49 · 19.5% (32 of 164 decks)
All creatures (8)
- Brash Taunter relevance 0.57 · 17.1% (28 of 164 decks)
- Goblin Anarchomancer relevance 0.54 · 21.3% (35 of 164 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.52 · 26.2% (43 of 164 decks)
- Mr. Orfeo, the Boulder relevance 0.51 · 15.2% (25 of 164 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.49 · 19.5% (32 of 164 decks)
- Guardian Augmenter relevance 0.47 · 10.4% (17 of 164 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Druid relevance 0.47 · 14.6% (24 of 164 decks)
- Thrun, Breaker of Silence relevance 0.44 · 6.7% (11 of 164 decks)
All artifacts (8)
- Rakdos Signet relevance 0.72 · 24.4% (40 of 164 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.61 · 34.1% (56 of 164 decks)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.59 · 12.8% (21 of 164 decks)
- Gruul Signet relevance 0.59 · 20.1% (33 of 164 decks)
- Golgari Signet relevance 0.54 · 18.9% (31 of 164 decks)
- Fiendlash relevance 0.45 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.45 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.44 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Pestilence relevance 0.49 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Pain for All relevance 0.49 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Pyrohemia relevance 0.45 · 12.2% (20 of 164 decks)
All instants (20)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 1.31 · 35.4% (58 of 164 decks)
- Blossoming Defense relevance 1.03 · 19.5% (32 of 164 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.99 · 32.3% (53 of 164 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.92 · 26.2% (43 of 164 decks)
- Ranger's Guile relevance 0.79 · 12.2% (20 of 164 decks)
- Armor of Shadows relevance 0.76 · 12.2% (20 of 164 decks)
- Prizefight relevance 0.68 · 17.7% (29 of 164 decks)
- Rush of Vitality relevance 0.67 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.63 · 12.8% (21 of 164 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.60 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Fling relevance 0.55 · 18.3% (30 of 164 decks)
- Unleash Fury relevance 0.54 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Temur Battle Rage relevance 0.53 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Ancient Animus relevance 0.53 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Cosmic Hunger relevance 0.52 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Tail Swipe relevance 0.49 · 12.8% (21 of 164 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.47 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.47 · 15.2% (25 of 164 decks)
- Pit Fight relevance 0.44 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Soul's Fire relevance 0.44 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.72 · 20.7% (34 of 164 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.56 · 29.9% (49 of 164 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.53 · 36.6% (60 of 164 decks)
- Savage Punch relevance 0.52 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Flame Rift relevance 0.51 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Rhino's Rampage relevance 0.47 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
- Sign in Blood relevance 0.46 · 12.2% (20 of 164 decks)
- Nature's Way relevance 0.44 · 6.7% (11 of 164 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.63 · 28.0% (46 of 164 decks)
- Temple of Abandon relevance 0.47 · 17.1% (28 of 164 decks)
- Revitalizing Repast // Old-Growth Grove relevance 0.46 · 18.9% (31 of 164 decks)
EDH data for Withstand Death: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 164 real decks.