Sand Strangler

Played in 222 decks

Sand Strangler
$0.05 €0.09

Change per day

Color Identity Spread

Commanders

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
All commanders (4)
  1. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 3.61 · 3.5% (147 of 4,186 decks)
  2. Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Dragon Cultist relevance 1.19 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
  3. Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist relevance 1.05 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
  4. Vial Smasher the Fierce // The Prismatic Piper relevance 1.02 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)

Most Relevant

24

Showing 1-10 of 24

Page size
  • Desert's Hold
    6.37 72.1%
    $0.17 €0.09
  • Outcaster Greenblade
    6.16 80.6%
    $0.22 €0.07
  • Gilded Cerodon
    5.83 56.3%
    $0.03 €0.04
  • Colossal Rattlewurm
    5.79 82.4%
    $0.32 €0.24
  • Ramunap Hydra
    5.61 68.9%
    $0.38 €0.23
  • Desert Warfare
    5.57 85.1%
    $0.42 €0.62
  • Solitary Camel
    5.43 54.1%
    $0.09 €0.05
  • Cataclysmic Prospecting
    5.42 73.9%
    $0.27 €0.27
  • Sidewinder Naga
    5.19 50.0%
    $0.09 €0.08
  • Shefet Monitor
    5.06 66.7%
    $0.28 €0.25
All most relevant (24)
  1. Desert's Hold relevance 6.37 · 72.1% (160 of 222 decks)
  2. Outcaster Greenblade relevance 6.16 · 80.6% (179 of 222 decks)
  3. Gilded Cerodon relevance 5.83 · 56.3% (125 of 222 decks)
  4. Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 5.79 · 82.4% (183 of 222 decks)
  5. Ramunap Hydra relevance 5.61 · 68.9% (153 of 222 decks)
  6. Desert Warfare relevance 5.57 · 85.1% (189 of 222 decks)
  7. Solitary Camel relevance 5.43 · 54.1% (120 of 222 decks)
  8. Cataclysmic Prospecting relevance 5.42 · 73.9% (164 of 222 decks)
  9. Sidewinder Naga relevance 5.19 · 50.0% (111 of 222 decks)
  10. Shefet Monitor relevance 5.06 · 66.7% (148 of 222 decks)
  11. Sand Scout relevance 4.96 · 83.8% (186 of 222 decks)
  12. Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 4.87 · 76.6% (170 of 222 decks)
  13. Dune Chanter relevance 4.79 · 77.0% (171 of 222 decks)
  14. Cactarantula relevance 4.61 · 57.7% (128 of 222 decks)
  15. Silver Deputy relevance 4.58 · 58.1% (129 of 222 decks)
  16. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 4.57 · 59.9% (133 of 222 decks)
  17. Map the Frontier relevance 4.53 · 80.2% (178 of 222 decks)
  18. Spinewoods Armadillo relevance 4.39 · 56.8% (126 of 222 decks)
  19. Dune Diviner relevance 4.35 · 41.9% (93 of 222 decks)
  20. Wall of Forgotten Pharaohs relevance 3.96 · 42.3% (94 of 222 decks)
  21. Hour of Promise relevance 3.84 · 68.9% (153 of 222 decks)
  22. Sandblast relevance 1.97 · 21.6% (48 of 222 decks)
  23. Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.97 · 35.1% (78 of 222 decks)
  24. Sandstorm relevance 1.68 · 18.5% (41 of 222 decks)

Creatures

15

Showing 1-10 of 15

Page size
  • Outcaster Greenblade
    6.16 80.6%
    $0.22 €0.07
  • Gilded Cerodon
    5.83 56.3%
    $0.03 €0.04
  • Colossal Rattlewurm
    5.79 82.4%
    $0.32 €0.24
  • Ramunap Hydra
    5.61 68.9%
    $0.38 €0.23
  • Solitary Camel
    5.43 54.1%
    $0.09 €0.05
  • Sidewinder Naga
    5.19 50.0%
    $0.09 €0.08
  • Shefet Monitor
    5.06 66.7%
    $0.28 €0.25
  • Sand Scout
    4.96 83.8%
    $5.67 €6.85
  • Dune Chanter
    4.79 77.0%
    $1.31 €0.66
  • Cactarantula
    4.61 57.7%
    $0.09 €0.06
All creatures (15)
  1. Outcaster Greenblade relevance 6.16 · 80.6% (179 of 222 decks)
  2. Gilded Cerodon relevance 5.83 · 56.3% (125 of 222 decks)
  3. Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 5.79 · 82.4% (183 of 222 decks)
  4. Ramunap Hydra relevance 5.61 · 68.9% (153 of 222 decks)
  5. Solitary Camel relevance 5.43 · 54.1% (120 of 222 decks)
  6. Sidewinder Naga relevance 5.19 · 50.0% (111 of 222 decks)
  7. Shefet Monitor relevance 5.06 · 66.7% (148 of 222 decks)
  8. Sand Scout relevance 4.96 · 83.8% (186 of 222 decks)
  9. Dune Chanter relevance 4.79 · 77.0% (171 of 222 decks)
  10. Cactarantula relevance 4.61 · 57.7% (128 of 222 decks)
  11. Silver Deputy relevance 4.58 · 58.1% (129 of 222 decks)
  12. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 4.57 · 59.9% (133 of 222 decks)
  13. Spinewoods Armadillo relevance 4.39 · 56.8% (126 of 222 decks)
  14. Dune Diviner relevance 4.35 · 41.9% (93 of 222 decks)
  15. Wall of Forgotten Pharaohs relevance 3.96 · 42.3% (94 of 222 decks)

Enchantments

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Desert's Hold
    6.37 72.1%
    $0.17 €0.09
  • Desert Warfare
    5.57 85.1%
    $0.42 €0.62
All enchantments (2)
  1. Desert's Hold relevance 6.37 · 72.1% (160 of 222 decks)
  2. Desert Warfare relevance 5.57 · 85.1% (189 of 222 decks)

Instants

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Sandblast
    1.97 21.6%
    $0.08 €0.02
  • Sandstorm
    1.68 18.5%
    $0.20 €0.10
All instants (2)
  1. Sandblast relevance 1.97 · 21.6% (48 of 222 decks)
  2. Sandstorm relevance 1.68 · 18.5% (41 of 222 decks)

Sorceries

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Cataclysmic Prospecting
    5.42 73.9%
    $0.27 €0.27
  • Dance of the Tumbleweeds
    4.87 76.6%
    $0.20 €0.08
  • Map the Frontier
    4.53 80.2%
    $0.30 €0.18
  • Hour of Promise
    3.84 68.9%
    $0.34 €0.22
  • Nahiri's Lithoforming
    1.97 35.1%
    $0.46 €0.42
All sorceries (5)
  1. Cataclysmic Prospecting relevance 5.42 · 73.9% (164 of 222 decks)
  2. Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 4.87 · 76.6% (170 of 222 decks)
  3. Map the Frontier relevance 4.53 · 80.2% (178 of 222 decks)
  4. Hour of Promise relevance 3.84 · 68.9% (153 of 222 decks)
  5. Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.97 · 35.1% (78 of 222 decks)

Utility Lands

20

Showing 1-10 of 20

Page size
  • Ramunap Ruins
    5.23 91.9%
    $0.33 €0.44
  • Shefet Dunes
    5.16 85.6%
    $0.30 €0.29
  • Hashep Oasis
    4.98 86.0%
    $0.24 €0.22
  • Desert of the Fervent
    4.96 90.1%
    $0.24 €0.12
  • Hostile Desert
    4.88 70.7%
    $0.21 €0.14
  • Desert of the Indomitable
    4.87 86.0%
    $0.21 €0.15
  • Desert of the True
    4.75 86.0%
    $0.26 €0.17
  • Desert
    4.73 81.5%
    $1.28 €1.72
  • Dunes of the Dead
    4.66 75.7%
    $0.29 €0.21
  • Sandstorm Verge
    4.59 73.9%
    $0.24 €0.14
All utility lands (20)
  1. Ramunap Ruins relevance 5.23 · 91.9% (204 of 222 decks)
  2. Shefet Dunes relevance 5.16 · 85.6% (190 of 222 decks)
  3. Hashep Oasis relevance 4.98 · 86.0% (191 of 222 decks)
  4. Desert of the Fervent relevance 4.96 · 90.1% (200 of 222 decks)
  5. Hostile Desert relevance 4.88 · 70.7% (157 of 222 decks)
  6. Desert of the Indomitable relevance 4.87 · 86.0% (191 of 222 decks)
  7. Desert of the True relevance 4.75 · 86.0% (191 of 222 decks)
  8. Desert relevance 4.73 · 81.5% (181 of 222 decks)
  9. Dunes of the Dead relevance 4.66 · 75.7% (168 of 222 decks)
  10. Sandstorm Verge relevance 4.59 · 73.9% (164 of 222 decks)
  11. Grasping Dunes relevance 4.54 · 69.4% (154 of 222 decks)
  12. Endless Sands relevance 4.54 · 74.3% (165 of 222 decks)
  13. Sunscorched Desert relevance 4.46 · 82.0% (182 of 222 decks)
  14. Cradle of the Accursed relevance 4.25 · 62.6% (139 of 222 decks)
  15. Cactus Preserve relevance 3.95 · 68.9% (153 of 222 decks)
  16. Arid Archway relevance 3.94 · 83.8% (186 of 222 decks)
  17. Conduit Pylons relevance 3.77 · 77.0% (171 of 222 decks)
  18. Lazotep Quarry relevance 3.44 · 73.0% (162 of 222 decks)
  19. Scavenger Grounds relevance 2.76 · 83.3% (185 of 222 decks)
  20. Bucolic Ranch relevance 2.44 · 32.0% (71 of 222 decks)

Lands

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Painted Bluffs
    4.64 72.1%
    $0.20 €0.21
  • Bristling Backwoods
    4.43 77.9%
    $0.31 €0.14
  • Mirage Mesa
    4.42 75.7%
    $0.21 €0.12
  • Creosote Heath
    4.36 75.2%
    $0.25 €0.14
  • Abraded Bluffs
    4.29 78.4%
    $0.33 €0.26
  • Survivors' Encampment
    3.86 73.4%
    $0.36 €0.38
All lands (6)
  1. Painted Bluffs relevance 4.64 · 72.1% (160 of 222 decks)
  2. Bristling Backwoods relevance 4.43 · 77.9% (173 of 222 decks)
  3. Mirage Mesa relevance 4.42 · 75.7% (168 of 222 decks)
  4. Creosote Heath relevance 4.36 · 75.2% (167 of 222 decks)
  5. Abraded Bluffs relevance 4.29 · 78.4% (174 of 222 decks)
  6. Survivors' Encampment relevance 3.86 · 73.4% (163 of 222 decks)

EDH data for Sand Strangler: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 222 real decks.