Monoskelion
Played in 63 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
4.8% Simic
-
Colorless 252 · 19.4%
-
Orzhov 99 · 7.6%
-
Selesnya 95 · 7.3%
-
Jeskai 71 · 5.5%
-
Simic 63 · 4.8%
-
White 62 · 4.8%
-
Boros 62 · 4.8%
-
Grixis 61 · 4.7%
-
Azorius 59 · 4.5%
-
Blue 56 · 4.3%
-
Green 53 · 4.1%
-
Black 44 · 3.4%
-
Bant 36 · 2.8%
-
Golgari 34 · 2.6%
-
Naya 33 · 2.5%
-
Red 31 · 2.4%
-
Gruul 28 · 2.2%
-
Abzan 27 · 2.1%
- Other (11) 134 · 10.3%
230+37+5+1+1+3+3+
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Experiment Kraj relevance 2.04 · 1.7% (13 of 756 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest // Shameless Charlatan relevance 0.75 · 9.1% (1 of 11 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Triskelion relevance 1.48 · 25.4% (16 of 63 decks)
- Mindless Automaton relevance 1.34 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 1.19 · 27.0% (17 of 63 decks)
- Towashi Guide-Bot relevance 1.16 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 1.13 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 1.08 · 38.1% (24 of 63 decks)
- Hexavus relevance 1.04 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Surge Conductor relevance 1.02 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Arcbound Crusher relevance 1.00 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.98 · 34.9% (22 of 63 decks)
- Patchwork Automaton relevance 0.91 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Vigean Graftmage relevance 0.88 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Marketback Walker relevance 0.87 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Primal Empathy relevance 0.86 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
- Simic Ragworm relevance 0.86 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.83 · 30.2% (19 of 63 decks)
- Horseshoe Crab relevance 0.82 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Cytoplast Manipulator relevance 0.80 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.77 · 36.5% (23 of 63 decks)
- Experiment One relevance 0.76 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.75 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Armorcraft Judge relevance 0.75 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Viridian Joiner relevance 0.74 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
- Zameck Guildmage relevance 0.74 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.73 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Steel Overseer relevance 0.72 · 19.0% (12 of 63 decks)
- Hangarback Walker relevance 0.71 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Give // Take relevance 0.70 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.68 · 33.3% (21 of 63 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.65 · 31.7% (20 of 63 decks)
All creatures (37)
- Triskelion relevance 1.48 · 25.4% (16 of 63 decks)
- Mindless Automaton relevance 1.34 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 1.19 · 27.0% (17 of 63 decks)
- Towashi Guide-Bot relevance 1.16 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 1.13 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 1.08 · 38.1% (24 of 63 decks)
- Hexavus relevance 1.04 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Surge Conductor relevance 1.02 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Arcbound Crusher relevance 1.00 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.98 · 34.9% (22 of 63 decks)
- Patchwork Automaton relevance 0.91 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Vigean Graftmage relevance 0.88 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Marketback Walker relevance 0.87 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Simic Ragworm relevance 0.86 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.83 · 30.2% (19 of 63 decks)
- Horseshoe Crab relevance 0.82 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Cytoplast Manipulator relevance 0.80 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.77 · 36.5% (23 of 63 decks)
- Experiment One relevance 0.76 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.75 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Armorcraft Judge relevance 0.75 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Viridian Joiner relevance 0.74 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
- Zameck Guildmage relevance 0.74 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.73 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Steel Overseer relevance 0.72 · 19.0% (12 of 63 decks)
- Hangarback Walker relevance 0.71 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.65 · 31.7% (20 of 63 decks)
- Threefold Thunderhulk relevance 0.65 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
- Arcanis the Omnipotent relevance 0.64 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.63 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
- Plaxcaster Frogling relevance 0.63 · 19.0% (12 of 63 decks)
- Pili-Pala relevance 0.60 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
- Simic Manipulator relevance 0.60 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.58 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.53 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Iron Spider, Stark Upgrade relevance 0.51 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 0.51 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Primal Empathy relevance 0.86 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.68 · 33.3% (21 of 63 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.60 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.54 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.50 · 31.7% (20 of 63 decks)
All instants (1)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.63 · 31.7% (20 of 63 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Give // Take relevance 0.70 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Power Depot relevance 0.73 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.69 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.54 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
All lands (3)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.59 · 19.0% (12 of 63 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.54 · 27.0% (17 of 63 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.49 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
EDH data for Monoskelion: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 63 real decks.




































