Giant Cindermaw
Played in 312 Rakdos decks
Color Identity Spread
5.8% Rakdos
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (6)
- Obosh, the Preypiercer relevance 1.99 · 2.9% (26 of 906 decks)
- Garna, Bloodfist of Keld relevance 1.95 · 2.8% (25 of 907 decks)
- Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.61 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Nocturno of Myra's Marvels // Ignacio of Myra's Marvels relevance 0.35 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Gut, True Soul Zealot // Cultist of the Absolute relevance 0.33 · 1.4% (1 of 71 decks)
- Falthis, Shadowcat Familiar // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.32 · 1.3% (1 of 78 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Perforating Artist relevance 1.05 · 30.1% (94 of 312 decks)
- Hero's Downfall relevance 0.86 · 21.2% (66 of 312 decks)
- Gratuitous Violence relevance 0.85 · 23.1% (72 of 312 decks)
- Zombify relevance 0.78 · 18.3% (57 of 312 decks)
- Vengeful Bloodwitch relevance 0.75 · 17.9% (56 of 312 decks)
- Burst Lightning relevance 0.72 · 16.3% (51 of 312 decks)
- Knight of Dusk's Shadow relevance 0.70 · 10.9% (34 of 312 decks)
- Immersturm Predator relevance 0.64 · 16.0% (50 of 312 decks)
- Pulse Tracker relevance 0.61 · 11.5% (36 of 312 decks)
- Guttersnipe relevance 0.60 · 24.7% (77 of 312 decks)
- Fanatical Firebrand relevance 0.58 · 12.2% (38 of 312 decks)
- Massacre Wurm relevance 0.58 · 21.8% (68 of 312 decks)
- Skullcrack relevance 0.57 · 10.3% (32 of 312 decks)
- Dragonmaster Outcast relevance 0.56 · 12.2% (38 of 312 decks)
- Kaervek the Merciless relevance 0.56 · 23.1% (72 of 312 decks)
- Duress relevance 0.55 · 12.2% (38 of 312 decks)
- Garna, Bloodfist of Keld relevance 0.55 · 17.6% (55 of 312 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.54 · 34.3% (107 of 312 decks)
- Viashino Pyromancer relevance 0.52 · 9.6% (30 of 312 decks)
- Vampire Nighthawk relevance 0.52 · 13.8% (43 of 312 decks)
- Ball Lightning relevance 0.51 · 10.9% (34 of 312 decks)
- Shock relevance 0.50 · 14.1% (44 of 312 decks)
- Stromkirk Noble relevance 0.50 · 8.0% (25 of 312 decks)
- Arbiter of Woe relevance 0.49 · 8.7% (27 of 312 decks)
- Everlasting Torment relevance 0.48 · 10.9% (34 of 312 decks)
- Quakebringer relevance 0.47 · 7.7% (24 of 312 decks)
- Impact Tremors relevance 0.47 · 21.8% (68 of 312 decks)
- Tribute to Hunger relevance 0.47 · 7.4% (23 of 312 decks)
- Gatekeeper of Malakir relevance 0.47 · 7.4% (23 of 312 decks)
- Scytheclaw Raptor relevance 0.47 · 10.6% (33 of 312 decks)
All creatures (24)
- Perforating Artist relevance 1.05 · 30.1% (94 of 312 decks)
- Vengeful Bloodwitch relevance 0.75 · 17.9% (56 of 312 decks)
- Knight of Dusk's Shadow relevance 0.70 · 10.9% (34 of 312 decks)
- Immersturm Predator relevance 0.64 · 16.0% (50 of 312 decks)
- Pulse Tracker relevance 0.61 · 11.5% (36 of 312 decks)
- Guttersnipe relevance 0.60 · 24.7% (77 of 312 decks)
- Fanatical Firebrand relevance 0.58 · 12.2% (38 of 312 decks)
- Massacre Wurm relevance 0.58 · 21.8% (68 of 312 decks)
- Dragonmaster Outcast relevance 0.56 · 12.2% (38 of 312 decks)
- Kaervek the Merciless relevance 0.56 · 23.1% (72 of 312 decks)
- Garna, Bloodfist of Keld relevance 0.55 · 17.6% (55 of 312 decks)
- Viashino Pyromancer relevance 0.52 · 9.6% (30 of 312 decks)
- Vampire Nighthawk relevance 0.52 · 13.8% (43 of 312 decks)
- Ball Lightning relevance 0.51 · 10.9% (34 of 312 decks)
- Stromkirk Noble relevance 0.50 · 8.0% (25 of 312 decks)
- Arbiter of Woe relevance 0.49 · 8.7% (27 of 312 decks)
- Quakebringer relevance 0.47 · 7.7% (24 of 312 decks)
- Gatekeeper of Malakir relevance 0.47 · 7.4% (23 of 312 decks)
- Scytheclaw Raptor relevance 0.47 · 10.6% (33 of 312 decks)
- Taurean Mauler relevance 0.46 · 13.8% (43 of 312 decks)
- Redcap Gutter-Dweller relevance 0.46 · 9.6% (30 of 312 decks)
- Rampaging Ferocidon relevance 0.46 · 17.0% (53 of 312 decks)
- Sunspine Lynx relevance 0.45 · 9.9% (31 of 312 decks)
- Desecration Demon relevance 0.45 · 8.7% (27 of 312 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Gratuitous Violence relevance 0.85 · 23.1% (72 of 312 decks)
- Everlasting Torment relevance 0.48 · 10.9% (34 of 312 decks)
- Impact Tremors relevance 0.47 · 21.8% (68 of 312 decks)
- Grievous Wound relevance 0.45 · 11.2% (35 of 312 decks)
- Havoc Festival relevance 0.42 · 10.9% (34 of 312 decks)
All instants (10)
- Hero's Downfall relevance 0.86 · 21.2% (66 of 312 decks)
- Burst Lightning relevance 0.72 · 16.3% (51 of 312 decks)
- Skullcrack relevance 0.57 · 10.3% (32 of 312 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.54 · 34.3% (107 of 312 decks)
- Shock relevance 0.50 · 14.1% (44 of 312 decks)
- Tribute to Hunger relevance 0.47 · 7.4% (23 of 312 decks)
- Moment of Craving relevance 0.46 · 6.7% (21 of 312 decks)
- Undying Malice relevance 0.46 · 16.7% (52 of 312 decks)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.44 · 24.0% (75 of 312 decks)
- Call In a Professional relevance 0.44 · 6.4% (20 of 312 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Zombify relevance 0.78 · 18.3% (57 of 312 decks)
- Duress relevance 0.55 · 12.2% (38 of 312 decks)
- Obliterating Bolt relevance 0.44 · 6.7% (21 of 312 decks)
- Crash Through relevance 0.43 · 9.6% (30 of 312 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Temple of Malice relevance 0.57 · 43.6% (136 of 312 decks)
- Tramway Station relevance 0.44 · 11.2% (35 of 312 decks)
All lands (5)
- Bloodfell Caves relevance 0.96 · 52.6% (164 of 312 decks)
- Rakdos Guildgate relevance 0.88 · 30.1% (94 of 312 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.52 · 29.2% (91 of 312 decks)
- Thriving Bluff relevance 0.51 · 13.8% (43 of 312 decks)
- Thriving Moor relevance 0.43 · 11.5% (36 of 312 decks)
EDH data for Giant Cindermaw: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 312 real decks.