Ezuri's Archers
Played in 114 Naya decks
130+48+1+1+
Color Identity Spread
5.3% Naya
-
Selesnya 996 · 46.5%
-
Green 412 · 19.2%
-
Golgari 361 · 16.8%
-
Naya 114 · 5.3%
-
Sultai 94 · 4.4%
-
Simic 59 · 2.8%
- Other (8) 107 · 5.0%
Commanders
Most Relevant
Elvish Archdruid 66.7% of decks
Elvish Archdruid 66.7% of decks
Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen 40.4% of decks
Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen 40.4% of decks
Imperious Perfect 54.4% of decks
Imperious Perfect 54.4% of decks
Copperhorn Scout 36.8% of decks
Copperhorn Scout 36.8% of decks
Dwynen's Elite 36.0% of decks
Dwynen's Elite 36.0% of decks
Priest of Titania 57.0% of decks
Priest of Titania 57.0% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Voja, Jaws of the Conclave relevance 2.80 · 1.1% (105 of 9,731 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 2.29 · 66.7% (76 of 114 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 2.15 · 40.4% (46 of 114 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 2.13 · 54.4% (62 of 114 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 2.03 · 36.8% (42 of 114 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 1.95 · 36.0% (41 of 114 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.90 · 57.0% (65 of 114 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.81 · 48.2% (55 of 114 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.70 · 33.3% (38 of 114 decks)
- Tolsimir, Midnight's Light relevance 1.61 · 39.5% (45 of 114 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.52 · 78.9% (90 of 114 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.47 · 43.0% (49 of 114 decks)
- Jaspera Sentinel relevance 1.45 · 22.8% (26 of 114 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.43 · 61.4% (70 of 114 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.37 · 38.6% (44 of 114 decks)
- Shalai and Hallar relevance 1.37 · 47.4% (54 of 114 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 1.35 · 33.3% (38 of 114 decks)
- Thornweald Archer relevance 1.31 · 20.2% (23 of 114 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.29 · 27.2% (31 of 114 decks)
- Druid of the Anima relevance 1.24 · 36.8% (42 of 114 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.24 · 26.3% (30 of 114 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 1.20 · 29.8% (34 of 114 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 1.18 · 26.3% (30 of 114 decks)
- Tolsimir, Friend to Wolves relevance 1.18 · 28.9% (33 of 114 decks)
- Hungry Ridgewolf relevance 1.17 · 17.5% (20 of 114 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.10 · 29.8% (34 of 114 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 1.10 · 18.4% (21 of 114 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 1.03 · 16.7% (19 of 114 decks)
- Ferocious Pup relevance 1.03 · 20.2% (23 of 114 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.98 · 30.7% (35 of 114 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.96 · 34.2% (39 of 114 decks)
All creatures (48)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 2.29 · 66.7% (76 of 114 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 2.15 · 40.4% (46 of 114 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 2.13 · 54.4% (62 of 114 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 2.03 · 36.8% (42 of 114 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 1.95 · 36.0% (41 of 114 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.90 · 57.0% (65 of 114 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.81 · 48.2% (55 of 114 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.70 · 33.3% (38 of 114 decks)
- Tolsimir, Midnight's Light relevance 1.61 · 39.5% (45 of 114 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.52 · 78.9% (90 of 114 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.47 · 43.0% (49 of 114 decks)
- Jaspera Sentinel relevance 1.45 · 22.8% (26 of 114 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.43 · 61.4% (70 of 114 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.37 · 38.6% (44 of 114 decks)
- Shalai and Hallar relevance 1.37 · 47.4% (54 of 114 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 1.35 · 33.3% (38 of 114 decks)
- Thornweald Archer relevance 1.31 · 20.2% (23 of 114 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.29 · 27.2% (31 of 114 decks)
- Druid of the Anima relevance 1.24 · 36.8% (42 of 114 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.24 · 26.3% (30 of 114 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 1.20 · 29.8% (34 of 114 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 1.18 · 26.3% (30 of 114 decks)
- Tolsimir, Friend to Wolves relevance 1.18 · 28.9% (33 of 114 decks)
- Hungry Ridgewolf relevance 1.17 · 17.5% (20 of 114 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.10 · 29.8% (34 of 114 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 1.10 · 18.4% (21 of 114 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 1.03 · 16.7% (19 of 114 decks)
- Ferocious Pup relevance 1.03 · 20.2% (23 of 114 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.98 · 30.7% (35 of 114 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.96 · 34.2% (39 of 114 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.96 · 16.7% (19 of 114 decks)
- Elvish Rejuvenator relevance 0.93 · 19.3% (22 of 114 decks)
- Bramblewood Paragon relevance 0.92 · 21.9% (25 of 114 decks)
- Young Wolf relevance 0.91 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 0.91 · 33.3% (38 of 114 decks)
- Tolsimir Wolfblood relevance 0.91 · 20.2% (23 of 114 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 0.90 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.88 · 21.9% (25 of 114 decks)
- Llanowar Loamspeaker relevance 0.88 · 17.5% (20 of 114 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.87 · 34.2% (39 of 114 decks)
- Sylvan Ranger relevance 0.86 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 0.86 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.86 · 21.1% (24 of 114 decks)
- Bloodbraid Elf relevance 0.85 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Packsong Pup relevance 0.84 · 16.7% (19 of 114 decks)
- Elvish Regrower relevance 0.83 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Nightpack Ambusher relevance 0.81 · 16.7% (19 of 114 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 0.80 · 14.9% (17 of 114 decks)
All instants (1)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.84 · 36.0% (41 of 114 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 0.86 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
EDH data for Ezuri's Archers: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 114 real decks.


















