230+23+5+3+9+5+2+3+
Color Identity Spread
11.7% Selesnya
Commanders
Most Relevant
Frantic Strength 30.1% of decks
Frantic Strength 30.1% of decks
Fear of Surveillance 23.5% of decks
Fear of Surveillance 23.5% of decks
Radiant Strike 18.3% of decks
Radiant Strike 18.3% of decks
Sami's Curiosity 19.6% of decks
Sami's Curiosity 19.6% of decks
Prophetic Prism 16.3% of decks
Prophetic Prism 16.3% of decks
Battlefield Promotion 16.3% of decks
Battlefield Promotion 16.3% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Haliya, Ascendant Cadet relevance 2.72 · 7.2% (25 of 346 decks)
- Rip, Spawn Hunter relevance 0.94 · 1.0% (6 of 575 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Frantic Strength relevance 1.76 · 30.1% (46 of 153 decks)
- Fear of Surveillance relevance 1.56 · 23.5% (36 of 153 decks)
- Radiant Strike relevance 1.17 · 18.3% (28 of 153 decks)
- Sami's Curiosity relevance 1.08 · 19.6% (30 of 153 decks)
- Prophetic Prism relevance 1.06 · 16.3% (25 of 153 decks)
- Battlefield Promotion relevance 1.05 · 16.3% (25 of 153 decks)
- Nutrient Block relevance 1.05 · 15.7% (24 of 153 decks)
- Linden, the Steadfast Queen relevance 1.05 · 19.6% (30 of 153 decks)
- Interjection relevance 1.02 · 15.7% (24 of 153 decks)
- Shattered Wings relevance 1.02 · 15.7% (24 of 153 decks)
- Syr Alin, the Lion's Claw relevance 0.99 · 15.0% (23 of 153 decks)
- Plummet relevance 0.98 · 16.3% (25 of 153 decks)
- Predator Ooze relevance 0.97 · 17.0% (26 of 153 decks)
- Soulmender relevance 0.95 · 16.3% (25 of 153 decks)
- Divine Offering relevance 0.94 · 15.0% (23 of 153 decks)
- Trapped in the Screen relevance 0.91 · 17.0% (26 of 153 decks)
- Battle Menu relevance 0.91 · 17.0% (26 of 153 decks)
- Snow Villiers relevance 0.91 · 15.0% (23 of 153 decks)
- Sire of Seven Deaths relevance 0.90 · 15.0% (23 of 153 decks)
- Three Tree Mascot relevance 0.89 · 14.4% (22 of 153 decks)
- Zetalpa, Primal Dawn relevance 0.87 · 18.3% (28 of 153 decks)
- Beyond the Quiet relevance 0.86 · 15.0% (23 of 153 decks)
- Lionheart Glimmer relevance 0.86 · 15.7% (24 of 153 decks)
- Summon: Choco/Mog relevance 0.85 · 18.3% (28 of 153 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.85 · 19.6% (30 of 153 decks)
- Akroma, Angel of Wrath relevance 0.82 · 15.7% (24 of 153 decks)
- Gene Pollinator relevance 0.81 · 17.0% (26 of 153 decks)
- Charming Prince relevance 0.81 · 16.3% (25 of 153 decks)
- Cultivator's Caravan relevance 0.81 · 15.0% (23 of 153 decks)
- Horrid Vigor relevance 0.80 · 15.0% (23 of 153 decks)
All creatures (23)
- Fear of Surveillance relevance 1.56 · 23.5% (36 of 153 decks)
- Linden, the Steadfast Queen relevance 1.05 · 19.6% (30 of 153 decks)
- Syr Alin, the Lion's Claw relevance 0.99 · 15.0% (23 of 153 decks)
- Predator Ooze relevance 0.97 · 17.0% (26 of 153 decks)
- Soulmender relevance 0.95 · 16.3% (25 of 153 decks)
- Snow Villiers relevance 0.91 · 15.0% (23 of 153 decks)
- Sire of Seven Deaths relevance 0.90 · 15.0% (23 of 153 decks)
- Three Tree Mascot relevance 0.89 · 14.4% (22 of 153 decks)
- Zetalpa, Primal Dawn relevance 0.87 · 18.3% (28 of 153 decks)
- Lionheart Glimmer relevance 0.86 · 15.7% (24 of 153 decks)
- Summon: Choco/Mog relevance 0.85 · 18.3% (28 of 153 decks)
- Akroma, Angel of Wrath relevance 0.82 · 15.7% (24 of 153 decks)
- Gene Pollinator relevance 0.81 · 17.0% (26 of 153 decks)
- Charming Prince relevance 0.81 · 16.3% (25 of 153 decks)
- Tapestry Warden relevance 0.80 · 15.7% (24 of 153 decks)
- Okoye, Dora Milaje Leader relevance 0.80 · 14.4% (22 of 153 decks)
- Fang of Shigeki relevance 0.78 · 14.4% (22 of 153 decks)
- Adelbert Steiner relevance 0.77 · 11.8% (18 of 153 decks)
- Drix Fatemaker relevance 0.77 · 17.0% (26 of 153 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.74 · 15.7% (24 of 153 decks)
- Summon: Fat Chocobo relevance 0.74 · 17.6% (27 of 153 decks)
- Bamboo Grove Archer relevance 0.73 · 11.8% (18 of 153 decks)
- Greater Tanuki relevance 0.71 · 12.4% (19 of 153 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Prophetic Prism relevance 1.06 · 16.3% (25 of 153 decks)
- Nutrient Block relevance 1.05 · 15.7% (24 of 153 decks)
- Cultivator's Caravan relevance 0.81 · 15.0% (23 of 153 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 0.77 · 11.8% (18 of 153 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.75 · 15.0% (23 of 153 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Frantic Strength relevance 1.76 · 30.1% (46 of 153 decks)
- Trapped in the Screen relevance 0.91 · 17.0% (26 of 153 decks)
- Banishing Light relevance 0.71 · 19.6% (30 of 153 decks)
All instants (9)
- Radiant Strike relevance 1.17 · 18.3% (28 of 153 decks)
- Battlefield Promotion relevance 1.05 · 16.3% (25 of 153 decks)
- Interjection relevance 1.02 · 15.7% (24 of 153 decks)
- Plummet relevance 0.98 · 16.3% (25 of 153 decks)
- Divine Offering relevance 0.94 · 15.0% (23 of 153 decks)
- Battle Menu relevance 0.91 · 17.0% (26 of 153 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.85 · 19.6% (30 of 153 decks)
- Horrid Vigor relevance 0.80 · 15.0% (23 of 153 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.71 · 18.3% (28 of 153 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Sami's Curiosity relevance 1.08 · 19.6% (30 of 153 decks)
- Shattered Wings relevance 1.02 · 15.7% (24 of 153 decks)
- Beyond the Quiet relevance 0.86 · 15.0% (23 of 153 decks)
- Helping Hand relevance 0.75 · 16.3% (25 of 153 decks)
- Emerge from the Cocoon relevance 0.69 · 11.1% (17 of 153 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Inkmoth Nexus relevance 0.72 · 15.0% (23 of 153 decks)
- Suburban Sanctuary relevance 0.69 · 16.3% (25 of 153 decks)
All lands (3)
- Crossroads Village relevance 0.95 · 18.3% (28 of 153 decks)
- Command Bridge relevance 0.92 · 17.0% (26 of 153 decks)
- Etched Cornfield relevance 0.74 · 17.0% (26 of 153 decks)
EDH data for Grasping Longneck: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 153 real decks.













































