Trickery Charm
Played in 1,332 Dimir decks
Color Identity Spread
20.3% Dimir
Commanders
8
Commanders
8All commanders (8)
- Yuriko, the Tiger's Shadow relevance 2.99 · 5.7% (919 of 16,075 decks)
- Marvo, Deep Operative relevance 2.55 · 5.8% (325 of 5,607 decks)
- Seven of Nine relevance 1.59 · 10.8% (17 of 157 decks)
- Agent of the Iron Throne // Alora, Merry Thief relevance 0.46 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Haunted One // Alora, Merry Thief relevance 0.32 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools // Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator relevance 0.31 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Ur-Drago relevance 0.27 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Scion of Halaster // Volo, Itinerant Scholar relevance 0.15 · 1.3% (1 of 79 decks)
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30All most relevant (30)
- Ingenious Infiltrator relevance 1.53 · 60.3% (803 of 1,332 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 1.51 · 57.6% (767 of 1,332 decks)
- Mistblade Shinobi relevance 1.46 · 54.8% (730 of 1,332 decks)
- Ninja of the Deep Hours relevance 1.46 · 53.5% (712 of 1,332 decks)
- Shadow of Mortality relevance 1.43 · 47.3% (630 of 1,332 decks)
- Ornithopter relevance 1.39 · 59.4% (791 of 1,332 decks)
- Prosperous Thief relevance 1.38 · 57.7% (769 of 1,332 decks)
- Thousand-Faced Shadow relevance 1.34 · 56.0% (746 of 1,332 decks)
- Portent relevance 1.32 · 33.5% (446 of 1,332 decks)
- Faerie Seer relevance 1.32 · 53.8% (716 of 1,332 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 1.30 · 49.3% (657 of 1,332 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 1.29 · 53.0% (706 of 1,332 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 1.25 · 42.7% (569 of 1,332 decks)
- Spy Network relevance 1.25 · 27.6% (367 of 1,332 decks)
- Moon-Circuit Hacker relevance 1.24 · 46.5% (620 of 1,332 decks)
- Lim-Dûl's Vault relevance 1.22 · 47.7% (636 of 1,332 decks)
- Changeling Outcast relevance 1.20 · 65.4% (871 of 1,332 decks)
- Gingerbrute relevance 1.20 · 39.1% (521 of 1,332 decks)
- Smoke Shroud relevance 1.19 · 35.1% (467 of 1,332 decks)
- Slither Blade relevance 1.19 · 53.1% (707 of 1,332 decks)
- Diabolic Vision relevance 1.18 · 31.0% (413 of 1,332 decks)
- Mothdust Changeling relevance 1.17 · 38.5% (513 of 1,332 decks)
- Silver-Fur Master relevance 1.16 · 49.3% (657 of 1,332 decks)
- Mist-Syndicate Naga relevance 1.14 · 36.0% (480 of 1,332 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 1.12 · 41.7% (555 of 1,332 decks)
- Skullsnatcher relevance 1.12 · 34.8% (463 of 1,332 decks)
- Murderous Cut relevance 1.10 · 26.9% (358 of 1,332 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 1.10 · 85.0% (1,132 of 1,332 decks)
- Wingcrafter relevance 1.09 · 31.7% (422 of 1,332 decks)
- Fallen Shinobi relevance 1.08 · 43.8% (584 of 1,332 decks)
Creatures
28
Creatures
28 All creatures (28)
- Ingenious Infiltrator relevance 1.53 · 60.3% (803 of 1,332 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 1.51 · 57.6% (767 of 1,332 decks)
- Mistblade Shinobi relevance 1.46 · 54.8% (730 of 1,332 decks)
- Ninja of the Deep Hours relevance 1.46 · 53.5% (712 of 1,332 decks)
- Shadow of Mortality relevance 1.43 · 47.3% (630 of 1,332 decks)
- Ornithopter relevance 1.39 · 59.4% (791 of 1,332 decks)
- Prosperous Thief relevance 1.38 · 57.7% (769 of 1,332 decks)
- Thousand-Faced Shadow relevance 1.34 · 56.0% (746 of 1,332 decks)
- Faerie Seer relevance 1.32 · 53.8% (716 of 1,332 decks)
- Moon-Circuit Hacker relevance 1.24 · 46.5% (620 of 1,332 decks)
- Changeling Outcast relevance 1.20 · 65.4% (871 of 1,332 decks)
- Gingerbrute relevance 1.20 · 39.1% (521 of 1,332 decks)
- Slither Blade relevance 1.19 · 53.1% (707 of 1,332 decks)
- Mothdust Changeling relevance 1.17 · 38.5% (513 of 1,332 decks)
- Silver-Fur Master relevance 1.16 · 49.3% (657 of 1,332 decks)
- Mist-Syndicate Naga relevance 1.14 · 36.0% (480 of 1,332 decks)
- Skullsnatcher relevance 1.12 · 34.8% (463 of 1,332 decks)
- Wingcrafter relevance 1.09 · 31.7% (422 of 1,332 decks)
- Fallen Shinobi relevance 1.08 · 43.8% (584 of 1,332 decks)
- Triton Shorestalker relevance 1.04 · 42.3% (563 of 1,332 decks)
- Tormented Soul relevance 1.01 · 35.0% (466 of 1,332 decks)
- Dokuchi Silencer relevance 0.97 · 28.2% (376 of 1,332 decks)
- Mist-Cloaked Herald relevance 0.97 · 34.4% (458 of 1,332 decks)
- Siren Stormtamer relevance 0.95 · 32.1% (427 of 1,332 decks)
- Silent-Blade Oni relevance 0.92 · 33.3% (443 of 1,332 decks)
- Spectral Sailor relevance 0.90 · 30.3% (404 of 1,332 decks)
- Throat Slitter relevance 0.89 · 27.1% (361 of 1,332 decks)
- Higure, the Still Wind relevance 0.87 · 26.9% (358 of 1,332 decks)
Artifacts
2
Artifacts
2 All artifacts (2)
- Scroll Rack relevance 1.06 · 33.6% (448 of 1,332 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.98 · 40.2% (536 of 1,332 decks)
Enchantments
3
Enchantments
3 All enchantments (3)
- Smoke Shroud relevance 1.19 · 35.1% (467 of 1,332 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 1.12 · 41.7% (555 of 1,332 decks)
- Soothsaying relevance 0.95 · 22.3% (297 of 1,332 decks)
Instants
10
Instants
10 All instants (10)
- Dig Through Time relevance 1.29 · 53.0% (706 of 1,332 decks)
- Spy Network relevance 1.25 · 27.6% (367 of 1,332 decks)
- Lim-Dûl's Vault relevance 1.22 · 47.7% (636 of 1,332 decks)
- Murderous Cut relevance 1.10 · 26.9% (358 of 1,332 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 1.10 · 85.0% (1,132 of 1,332 decks)
- Commit // Memory relevance 1.08 · 28.7% (382 of 1,332 decks)
- Telling Time relevance 1.08 · 24.4% (325 of 1,332 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 1.07 · 32.1% (427 of 1,332 decks)
- Consign // Oblivion relevance 1.02 · 26.9% (358 of 1,332 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.86 · 28.1% (374 of 1,332 decks)
Sorceries
6
Sorceries
6 All sorceries (6)
- Portent relevance 1.32 · 33.5% (446 of 1,332 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 1.30 · 49.3% (657 of 1,332 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 1.25 · 42.7% (569 of 1,332 decks)
- Diabolic Vision relevance 1.18 · 31.0% (413 of 1,332 decks)
- Ponder relevance 1.06 · 57.7% (768 of 1,332 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 1.06 · 30.8% (410 of 1,332 decks)
Utility Lands
1
Utility Lands
1 All utility lands (1)
- Halimar Depths relevance 1.40 · 49.2% (656 of 1,332 decks)
EDH data for Trickery Charm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,332 real decks.





























































