Griffin Canyon
Played in 442 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
26.2% Simic
- Five-Color 473 · 28.1%
- White 442 · 26.2%
- Simic 442 · 26.2%
- Blue 84 · 5.0%
- Azorius 68 · 4.0%
- Other (23) 176 · 10.4%
All commanders (6)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 3.87 · 5.8% (408 of 7,079 decks)
- Moritte of the Frost relevance 1.37 · 2.4% (16 of 674 decks)
- Acolyte of Bahamut // Volo, Itinerant Scholar relevance 0.38 · 1.0% (2 of 192 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.35 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.30 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Nael, Avizoa Aeronaut relevance 0.29 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Lord of the Unreal relevance 2.97 · 74.7% (330 of 442 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 2.68 · 58.6% (259 of 442 decks)
- Harabaz Druid relevance 2.29 · 45.2% (200 of 442 decks)
- Aven Courier relevance 2.21 · 50.2% (222 of 442 decks)
- Hakbal of the Surging Soul relevance 2.21 · 61.8% (273 of 442 decks)
- Feline Sovereign relevance 2.20 · 46.4% (205 of 442 decks)
- Galerider Sliver relevance 2.15 · 45.7% (202 of 442 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 2.14 · 58.1% (257 of 442 decks)
- Sea Gate Loremaster relevance 2.04 · 40.5% (179 of 442 decks)
- Thrumming Hivepool relevance 1.97 · 40.3% (178 of 442 decks)
- Baru, Wurmspeaker relevance 1.95 · 41.6% (184 of 442 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 1.93 · 52.3% (231 of 442 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 1.92 · 50.5% (223 of 442 decks)
- Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 1.90 · 43.9% (194 of 442 decks)
- Herald of Hoofbeats relevance 1.89 · 40.3% (178 of 442 decks)
- Multiclass Baldric relevance 1.88 · 39.1% (173 of 442 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.88 · 51.4% (227 of 442 decks)
- Scion of Oona relevance 1.81 · 35.7% (158 of 442 decks)
- Collective Restraint relevance 1.78 · 35.5% (157 of 442 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.75 · 57.2% (253 of 442 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.75 · 55.7% (246 of 442 decks)
- Sunderflock relevance 1.73 · 32.4% (143 of 442 decks)
- Pheres-Band Warchief relevance 1.70 · 33.0% (146 of 442 decks)
- Full Moon's Rise relevance 1.62 · 28.5% (126 of 442 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 1.48 · 30.8% (136 of 442 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.47 · 44.6% (197 of 442 decks)
- Absorb Identity relevance 1.44 · 27.1% (120 of 442 decks)
- Mass Appeal relevance 1.43 · 25.8% (114 of 442 decks)
- Seshiro the Anointed relevance 1.42 · 27.6% (122 of 442 decks)
- Peer Pressure relevance 1.42 · 29.4% (130 of 442 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Lord of the Unreal relevance 2.97 · 74.7% (330 of 442 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 2.68 · 58.6% (259 of 442 decks)
- Harabaz Druid relevance 2.29 · 45.2% (200 of 442 decks)
- Aven Courier relevance 2.21 · 50.2% (222 of 442 decks)
- Hakbal of the Surging Soul relevance 2.21 · 61.8% (273 of 442 decks)
- Feline Sovereign relevance 2.20 · 46.4% (205 of 442 decks)
- Galerider Sliver relevance 2.15 · 45.7% (202 of 442 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 2.14 · 58.1% (257 of 442 decks)
- Sea Gate Loremaster relevance 2.04 · 40.5% (179 of 442 decks)
- Baru, Wurmspeaker relevance 1.95 · 41.6% (184 of 442 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 1.93 · 52.3% (231 of 442 decks)
- Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 1.90 · 43.9% (194 of 442 decks)
- Herald of Hoofbeats relevance 1.89 · 40.3% (178 of 442 decks)
- Scion of Oona relevance 1.81 · 35.7% (158 of 442 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.75 · 57.2% (253 of 442 decks)
- Sunderflock relevance 1.73 · 32.4% (143 of 442 decks)
- Pheres-Band Warchief relevance 1.70 · 33.0% (146 of 442 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 1.48 · 30.8% (136 of 442 decks)
- Seshiro the Anointed relevance 1.42 · 27.6% (122 of 442 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Thrumming Hivepool relevance 1.97 · 40.3% (178 of 442 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 1.92 · 50.5% (223 of 442 decks)
- Multiclass Baldric relevance 1.88 · 39.1% (173 of 442 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.47 · 44.6% (197 of 442 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Collective Restraint relevance 1.78 · 35.5% (157 of 442 decks)
- Full Moon's Rise relevance 1.62 · 28.5% (126 of 442 decks)
All instants (1)
- Absorb Identity relevance 1.44 · 27.1% (120 of 442 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.88 · 51.4% (227 of 442 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.75 · 55.7% (246 of 442 decks)
- Mass Appeal relevance 1.43 · 25.8% (114 of 442 decks)
- Peer Pressure relevance 1.42 · 29.4% (130 of 442 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.40 · 56.1% (248 of 442 decks)
All utility lands (10)
- Swarmyard relevance 3.10 · 68.6% (303 of 442 decks)
- Maze's End relevance 2.36 · 60.6% (268 of 442 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 2.12 · 72.4% (320 of 442 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 1.97 · 55.0% (243 of 442 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 1.89 · 57.0% (252 of 442 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 1.73 · 42.5% (188 of 442 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 1.63 · 42.1% (186 of 442 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 1.62 · 35.7% (158 of 442 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 1.59 · 55.9% (247 of 442 decks)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 1.55 · 32.6% (144 of 442 decks)
All lands (9)
- Cloudpost relevance 2.99 · 85.5% (378 of 442 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 2.79 · 86.7% (383 of 442 decks)
- Baldur's Gate relevance 2.74 · 71.3% (315 of 442 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 2.65 · 81.7% (361 of 442 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 2.61 · 80.5% (356 of 442 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 2.32 · 65.4% (289 of 442 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 2.29 · 73.8% (326 of 442 decks)
- Glimmerpost relevance 1.69 · 45.2% (200 of 442 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 1.50 · 50.5% (223 of 442 decks)
EDH data for Griffin Canyon: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 442 real decks.