Garruk's Horde
Played in 152 Bant decks
Color Identity Spread
2.5% Bant
130+39+4+1+2+1+1+2+
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.48 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 1.10 · 30.9% (47 of 152 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 1.00 · 38.8% (59 of 152 decks)
- Vizier of the Menagerie relevance 0.99 · 22.4% (34 of 152 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.97 · 28.3% (43 of 152 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.80 · 15.8% (24 of 152 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.79 · 24.3% (37 of 152 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.78 · 28.3% (43 of 152 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.73 · 16.4% (25 of 152 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.72 · 18.4% (28 of 152 decks)
- Keruga, the Macrosage relevance 0.69 · 15.1% (23 of 152 decks)
- Chulane, Teller of Tales relevance 0.68 · 28.3% (43 of 152 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.68 · 27.6% (42 of 152 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.67 · 19.1% (29 of 152 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.66 · 17.1% (26 of 152 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 0.65 · 23.0% (35 of 152 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.64 · 11.8% (18 of 152 decks)
- Fblthp, Lost on the Range relevance 0.63 · 15.8% (24 of 152 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 0.62 · 19.7% (30 of 152 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.62 · 20.4% (31 of 152 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.60 · 11.2% (17 of 152 decks)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.60 · 18.4% (28 of 152 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.59 · 13.2% (20 of 152 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.58 · 11.8% (18 of 152 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.58 · 21.1% (32 of 152 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.56 · 14.5% (22 of 152 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.55 · 13.2% (20 of 152 decks)
- Thunderous Snapper relevance 0.54 · 9.9% (15 of 152 decks)
- Ethereal Valkyrie relevance 0.54 · 12.5% (19 of 152 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.54 · 9.2% (14 of 152 decks)
- Sakashima's Protege relevance 0.54 · 9.2% (14 of 152 decks)
All creatures (39)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 1.10 · 30.9% (47 of 152 decks)
- Vizier of the Menagerie relevance 0.99 · 22.4% (34 of 152 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.97 · 28.3% (43 of 152 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.80 · 15.8% (24 of 152 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.79 · 24.3% (37 of 152 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.78 · 28.3% (43 of 152 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.73 · 16.4% (25 of 152 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.72 · 18.4% (28 of 152 decks)
- Keruga, the Macrosage relevance 0.69 · 15.1% (23 of 152 decks)
- Chulane, Teller of Tales relevance 0.68 · 28.3% (43 of 152 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.68 · 27.6% (42 of 152 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.67 · 19.1% (29 of 152 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.66 · 17.1% (26 of 152 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 0.65 · 23.0% (35 of 152 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.64 · 11.8% (18 of 152 decks)
- Fblthp, Lost on the Range relevance 0.63 · 15.8% (24 of 152 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 0.62 · 19.7% (30 of 152 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.62 · 20.4% (31 of 152 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.58 · 11.8% (18 of 152 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.58 · 21.1% (32 of 152 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.56 · 14.5% (22 of 152 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.55 · 13.2% (20 of 152 decks)
- Thunderous Snapper relevance 0.54 · 9.9% (15 of 152 decks)
- Ethereal Valkyrie relevance 0.54 · 12.5% (19 of 152 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.54 · 9.2% (14 of 152 decks)
- Sakashima's Protege relevance 0.54 · 9.2% (14 of 152 decks)
- Starwinder relevance 0.53 · 12.5% (19 of 152 decks)
- Vega, the Watcher relevance 0.53 · 15.8% (24 of 152 decks)
- Chakram Retriever relevance 0.53 · 15.8% (24 of 152 decks)
- Zetalpa, Primal Dawn relevance 0.52 · 11.2% (17 of 152 decks)
- Koma, World-Eater relevance 0.51 · 14.5% (22 of 152 decks)
- Rashmi, Eternities Crafter relevance 0.50 · 13.2% (20 of 152 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.50 · 11.8% (18 of 152 decks)
- Prime Speaker Zegana relevance 0.49 · 13.8% (21 of 152 decks)
- Sage of the Beyond relevance 0.48 · 11.8% (18 of 152 decks)
- Genesis Hydra relevance 0.48 · 11.2% (17 of 152 decks)
- Tam, Observant Sequencer // Deep Sight relevance 0.47 · 10.5% (16 of 152 decks)
- Hivespine Wolverine relevance 0.46 · 7.9% (12 of 152 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 0.46 · 7.9% (12 of 152 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 1.00 · 38.8% (59 of 152 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.60 · 11.2% (17 of 152 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.59 · 13.2% (20 of 152 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.48 · 16.4% (25 of 152 decks)
All instants (1)
- Shore Up relevance 0.50 · 12.5% (19 of 152 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Make Your Own Luck relevance 0.50 · 11.8% (18 of 152 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.50 · 13.8% (21 of 152 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.60 · 18.4% (28 of 152 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.57 · 17.1% (26 of 152 decks)
All lands (2)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.54 · 17.8% (27 of 152 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.49 · 34.9% (53 of 152 decks)
EDH data for Garruk's Horde: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 152 real decks.

































