Monstrous War-Leech
Played in 84 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
23.6% Sultai
- Dimir 232 · 65.2%
- Sultai 84 · 23.6%
- Esper 14 · 3.9%
- Five-Color 11 · 3.1%
- Grixis 9 · 2.5%
- Other (4) 6 · 1.7%
All most relevant (30)
- Moldgraf Millipede relevance 1.25 · 19.0% (16 of 84 decks)
- Urborg Lhurgoyf relevance 0.97 · 20.2% (17 of 84 decks)
- Deranged Assistant relevance 0.96 · 25.0% (21 of 84 decks)
- Gurmag Nightwatch relevance 0.82 · 14.3% (12 of 84 decks)
- Eccentric Farmer relevance 0.82 · 13.1% (11 of 84 decks)
- Corpse Churn relevance 0.79 · 15.5% (13 of 84 decks)
- Splinterfright relevance 0.73 · 16.7% (14 of 84 decks)
- Unseal the Necropolis relevance 0.72 · 11.9% (10 of 84 decks)
- Uurg, Spawn of Turg relevance 0.68 · 14.3% (12 of 84 decks)
- Nighthowler relevance 0.67 · 11.9% (10 of 84 decks)
- Huskburster Swarm relevance 0.65 · 10.7% (9 of 84 decks)
- Nyx Weaver relevance 0.64 · 25.0% (21 of 84 decks)
- Vilespawn Spider relevance 0.60 · 11.9% (10 of 84 decks)
- Midnight Tilling relevance 0.56 · 14.3% (12 of 84 decks)
- Lotuslight Dancers relevance 0.54 · 16.7% (14 of 84 decks)
- Sultai Ascendancy relevance 0.53 · 14.3% (12 of 84 decks)
- Lie in Wait relevance 0.51 · 11.9% (10 of 84 decks)
- Fangkeeper's Familiar relevance 0.50 · 13.1% (11 of 84 decks)
- Millikin relevance 0.50 · 17.9% (15 of 84 decks)
- Awaken the Honored Dead relevance 0.50 · 17.9% (15 of 84 decks)
- Broodheart Engine relevance 0.50 · 9.5% (8 of 84 decks)
- Codex Shredder relevance 0.49 · 9.5% (8 of 84 decks)
- Exdeath, Void Warlock // Neo Exdeath, Dimension's End relevance 0.49 · 9.5% (8 of 84 decks)
- Gyruda, Doom of Depths relevance 0.48 · 10.7% (9 of 84 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.48 · 9.5% (8 of 84 decks)
- Kishla Skimmer relevance 0.48 · 19.0% (16 of 84 decks)
- Molt Tender relevance 0.47 · 11.9% (10 of 84 decks)
- Angel of Suffering relevance 0.46 · 10.7% (9 of 84 decks)
- Murder relevance 0.45 · 10.7% (9 of 84 decks)
- Syr Konrad, the Grim relevance 0.45 · 23.8% (20 of 84 decks)
All creatures (25)
- Moldgraf Millipede relevance 1.25 · 19.0% (16 of 84 decks)
- Urborg Lhurgoyf relevance 0.97 · 20.2% (17 of 84 decks)
- Deranged Assistant relevance 0.96 · 25.0% (21 of 84 decks)
- Gurmag Nightwatch relevance 0.82 · 14.3% (12 of 84 decks)
- Eccentric Farmer relevance 0.82 · 13.1% (11 of 84 decks)
- Splinterfright relevance 0.73 · 16.7% (14 of 84 decks)
- Uurg, Spawn of Turg relevance 0.68 · 14.3% (12 of 84 decks)
- Nighthowler relevance 0.67 · 11.9% (10 of 84 decks)
- Huskburster Swarm relevance 0.65 · 10.7% (9 of 84 decks)
- Nyx Weaver relevance 0.64 · 25.0% (21 of 84 decks)
- Vilespawn Spider relevance 0.60 · 11.9% (10 of 84 decks)
- Lotuslight Dancers relevance 0.54 · 16.7% (14 of 84 decks)
- Fangkeeper's Familiar relevance 0.50 · 13.1% (11 of 84 decks)
- Millikin relevance 0.50 · 17.9% (15 of 84 decks)
- Exdeath, Void Warlock // Neo Exdeath, Dimension's End relevance 0.49 · 9.5% (8 of 84 decks)
- Gyruda, Doom of Depths relevance 0.48 · 10.7% (9 of 84 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.48 · 9.5% (8 of 84 decks)
- Kishla Skimmer relevance 0.48 · 19.0% (16 of 84 decks)
- Molt Tender relevance 0.47 · 11.9% (10 of 84 decks)
- Angel of Suffering relevance 0.46 · 10.7% (9 of 84 decks)
- Syr Konrad, the Grim relevance 0.45 · 23.8% (20 of 84 decks)
- Tasigur, the Golden Fang relevance 0.43 · 11.9% (10 of 84 decks)
- Sidisi, Brood Tyrant relevance 0.42 · 17.9% (15 of 84 decks)
- Insidious Fungus relevance 0.42 · 10.7% (9 of 84 decks)
- The Ancient One relevance 0.42 · 9.5% (8 of 84 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Broodheart Engine relevance 0.50 · 9.5% (8 of 84 decks)
- Codex Shredder relevance 0.49 · 9.5% (8 of 84 decks)
- Essence Anchor relevance 0.43 · 11.9% (10 of 84 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Sultai Ascendancy relevance 0.53 · 14.3% (12 of 84 decks)
- Awaken the Honored Dead relevance 0.50 · 17.9% (15 of 84 decks)
- Dredger's Insight relevance 0.43 · 9.5% (8 of 84 decks)
All instants (4)
- Corpse Churn relevance 0.79 · 15.5% (13 of 84 decks)
- Unseal the Necropolis relevance 0.72 · 11.9% (10 of 84 decks)
- Midnight Tilling relevance 0.56 · 14.3% (12 of 84 decks)
- Murder relevance 0.45 · 10.7% (9 of 84 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Lie in Wait relevance 0.51 · 11.9% (10 of 84 decks)
All utility lands (7)
- Sinister Hideout relevance 0.66 · 13.1% (11 of 84 decks)
- Hidden Grotto relevance 0.57 · 11.9% (10 of 84 decks)
- Waterfront District relevance 0.52 · 9.5% (8 of 84 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.49 · 22.6% (19 of 84 decks)
- Restless Reef relevance 0.48 · 10.7% (9 of 84 decks)
- Titan's Grave relevance 0.44 · 9.5% (8 of 84 decks)
- Foreboding Landscape relevance 0.42 · 26.2% (22 of 84 decks)
All lands (7)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 1.07 · 35.7% (30 of 84 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.78 · 27.4% (23 of 84 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.69 · 45.2% (38 of 84 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.67 · 46.4% (39 of 84 decks)
- Uncharted Haven relevance 0.60 · 11.9% (10 of 84 decks)
- Contaminated Aquifer relevance 0.50 · 16.7% (14 of 84 decks)
- Treno, Dark City relevance 0.46 · 9.5% (8 of 84 decks)
EDH data for Monstrous War-Leech: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 84 real decks.