Word of Seizing
Played in 98 Mardu decks
Color Identity Spread
330+10+5+6+14+6+1+8+
That's every commander.
All commanders (3)
- Ravos, Soultender // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 0.61 · 4.5% (1 of 22 decks)
- Ravos, Soultender // Jeska, Thrice Reborn relevance 0.54 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Ravos, Soultender relevance 0.46 · 1.4% (1 of 72 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Deflecting Palm relevance 0.97 · 36.7% (36 of 98 decks)
- Backlash relevance 0.85 · 18.4% (18 of 98 decks)
- Rakdos Charm relevance 0.81 · 33.7% (33 of 98 decks)
- Solemnity relevance 0.81 · 14.3% (14 of 98 decks)
- Terminus relevance 0.76 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Dawn Charm relevance 0.72 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Sunforger relevance 0.72 · 20.4% (20 of 98 decks)
- Benevolent Offering relevance 0.71 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Delirium relevance 0.71 · 16.3% (16 of 98 decks)
- Kambal, Consul of Allocation relevance 0.70 · 20.4% (20 of 98 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.70 · 35.7% (35 of 98 decks)
- Duelist's Heritage relevance 0.68 · 21.4% (21 of 98 decks)
- Comeuppance relevance 0.68 · 19.4% (19 of 98 decks)
- Windborn Muse relevance 0.66 · 19.4% (19 of 98 decks)
- Price of Progress relevance 0.66 · 10.2% (10 of 98 decks)
- Deadly Tempest relevance 0.66 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Wild Ricochet relevance 0.63 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Arcbond relevance 0.62 · 14.3% (14 of 98 decks)
- Aven Mindcensor relevance 0.62 · 12.2% (12 of 98 decks)
- Kazuul, Tyrant of the Cliffs relevance 0.62 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Curse of Opulence relevance 0.62 · 22.4% (22 of 98 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.62 · 28.6% (28 of 98 decks)
- Merciless Eviction relevance 0.61 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
- Orzhov Advokist relevance 0.60 · 13.3% (13 of 98 decks)
- Lapse of Certainty relevance 0.60 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Hour of Revelation relevance 0.59 · 10.2% (10 of 98 decks)
- Rest in Peace relevance 0.59 · 10.2% (10 of 98 decks)
- Batwing Brume relevance 0.59 · 13.3% (13 of 98 decks)
- Kardur, Doomscourge relevance 0.59 · 21.4% (21 of 98 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.58 · 22.4% (22 of 98 decks)
All creatures (10)
- Kambal, Consul of Allocation relevance 0.70 · 20.4% (20 of 98 decks)
- Windborn Muse relevance 0.66 · 19.4% (19 of 98 decks)
- Aven Mindcensor relevance 0.62 · 12.2% (12 of 98 decks)
- Kazuul, Tyrant of the Cliffs relevance 0.62 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.62 · 28.6% (28 of 98 decks)
- Orzhov Advokist relevance 0.60 · 13.3% (13 of 98 decks)
- Kardur, Doomscourge relevance 0.59 · 21.4% (21 of 98 decks)
- Xantcha, Sleeper Agent relevance 0.55 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
- Frontier Warmonger relevance 0.53 · 10.2% (10 of 98 decks)
- Brash Taunter relevance 0.53 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Sunforger relevance 0.72 · 20.4% (20 of 98 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.58 · 22.4% (22 of 98 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.57 · 25.5% (25 of 98 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.56 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Orzhov Signet relevance 0.56 · 40.8% (40 of 98 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Solemnity relevance 0.81 · 14.3% (14 of 98 decks)
- Duelist's Heritage relevance 0.68 · 21.4% (21 of 98 decks)
- Curse of Opulence relevance 0.62 · 22.4% (22 of 98 decks)
- Rest in Peace relevance 0.59 · 10.2% (10 of 98 decks)
- Leyline of the Void relevance 0.54 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.53 · 20.4% (20 of 98 decks)
All instants (14)
- Deflecting Palm relevance 0.97 · 36.7% (36 of 98 decks)
- Backlash relevance 0.85 · 18.4% (18 of 98 decks)
- Rakdos Charm relevance 0.81 · 33.7% (33 of 98 decks)
- Dawn Charm relevance 0.72 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Benevolent Offering relevance 0.71 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Delirium relevance 0.71 · 16.3% (16 of 98 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.70 · 35.7% (35 of 98 decks)
- Comeuppance relevance 0.68 · 19.4% (19 of 98 decks)
- Price of Progress relevance 0.66 · 10.2% (10 of 98 decks)
- Wild Ricochet relevance 0.63 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Arcbond relevance 0.62 · 14.3% (14 of 98 decks)
- Lapse of Certainty relevance 0.60 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Batwing Brume relevance 0.59 · 13.3% (13 of 98 decks)
- Disenchant relevance 0.54 · 13.3% (13 of 98 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Terminus relevance 0.76 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Deadly Tempest relevance 0.66 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Merciless Eviction relevance 0.61 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
- Hour of Revelation relevance 0.59 · 10.2% (10 of 98 decks)
- Disrupt Decorum relevance 0.57 · 18.4% (18 of 98 decks)
- Killing Wave relevance 0.54 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.59 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
All lands (8)
- Boros Garrison relevance 0.80 · 32.7% (32 of 98 decks)
- Bloodfell Caves relevance 0.65 · 24.5% (24 of 98 decks)
- Rakdos Carnarium relevance 0.59 · 23.5% (23 of 98 decks)
- Orzhov Basilica relevance 0.57 · 24.5% (24 of 98 decks)
- Vivid Crag relevance 0.57 · 9.2% (9 of 98 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.55 · 36.7% (36 of 98 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.53 · 28.6% (28 of 98 decks)
- Transguild Promenade relevance 0.53 · 8.2% (8 of 98 decks)
EDH data for Word of Seizing: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 98 real decks.






















































