Brute Strength
Played in 248 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
3.3% Gruul
1430+2+1+1+41+1+4+
That's every commander.
All commanders (14)
- The Howling Abomination relevance 1.58 · 1.4% (26 of 1,796 decks)
- Ulrich of the Krallenhorde // Ulrich, Uncontested Alpha relevance 1.23 · 4.6% (5 of 108 decks)
- Hardy Outlander // Livaan, Cultist of Tiamat relevance 0.99 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Kraven, Proud Predator relevance 0.86 · 3.2% (3 of 93 decks)
- Krark, the Thumbless // Hardy of Myra's Marvels relevance 0.79 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Master Chef // Livaan, Cultist of Tiamat relevance 0.73 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Targ Nar, Demon-Fang Gnoll relevance 0.67 · 1.5% (3 of 206 decks)
- Krark, the Thumbless // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.64 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Popular Entertainer // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.53 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Rhino, Barreling Brute relevance 0.51 · 1.3% (2 of 155 decks)
- Krark, the Thumbless // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.43 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.41 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Meet and Greet "Sisay" relevance 0.39 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.35 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Giant Growth relevance 1.32 · 32.3% (80 of 248 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 1.14 · 22.2% (55 of 248 decks)
- Run Amok relevance 1.13 · 19.0% (47 of 248 decks)
- Blitzball Shot relevance 0.88 · 14.9% (37 of 248 decks)
- Temur Battle Rage relevance 0.84 · 25.8% (64 of 248 decks)
- Antagonize relevance 0.79 · 12.5% (31 of 248 decks)
- Titan's Strength relevance 0.74 · 12.5% (31 of 248 decks)
- Siege Smash relevance 0.72 · 15.7% (39 of 248 decks)
- Sure Strike relevance 0.71 · 12.1% (30 of 248 decks)
- Colossal Growth relevance 0.71 · 13.3% (33 of 248 decks)
- Brute Force relevance 0.70 · 12.5% (31 of 248 decks)
- Uncaged Fury relevance 0.68 · 12.1% (30 of 248 decks)
- Infuriate relevance 0.66 · 11.3% (28 of 248 decks)
- Blossoming Defense relevance 0.64 · 19.8% (49 of 248 decks)
- Bulk Up relevance 0.64 · 19.4% (48 of 248 decks)
- Bull's Strength relevance 0.63 · 9.3% (23 of 248 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.63 · 29.4% (73 of 248 decks)
- Fanatical Strength relevance 0.63 · 10.1% (25 of 248 decks)
- Charge Through relevance 0.58 · 12.5% (31 of 248 decks)
- Barge In relevance 0.58 · 8.9% (22 of 248 decks)
- Monstrous Rage relevance 0.53 · 11.7% (29 of 248 decks)
- Dreadmaw's Ire relevance 0.52 · 9.3% (23 of 248 decks)
- Crash Through relevance 0.50 · 10.9% (27 of 248 decks)
- Blazing Crescendo relevance 0.50 · 9.7% (24 of 248 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.50 · 13.3% (33 of 248 decks)
- Invigorate relevance 0.49 · 12.1% (30 of 248 decks)
- Twinferno relevance 0.47 · 10.1% (25 of 248 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.47 · 14.9% (37 of 248 decks)
- Reckless Ransacking relevance 0.47 · 8.5% (21 of 248 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.47 · 17.3% (43 of 248 decks)
All creatures (2)
- Zada, Hedron Grinder relevance 0.41 · 8.1% (20 of 248 decks)
- Ashroot Animist relevance 0.40 · 10.9% (27 of 248 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Two-Handed Axe // Sweeping Cleave relevance 0.45 · 11.7% (29 of 248 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.50 · 13.3% (33 of 248 decks)
All instants (41)
- Giant Growth relevance 1.32 · 32.3% (80 of 248 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 1.14 · 22.2% (55 of 248 decks)
- Run Amok relevance 1.13 · 19.0% (47 of 248 decks)
- Blitzball Shot relevance 0.88 · 14.9% (37 of 248 decks)
- Temur Battle Rage relevance 0.84 · 25.8% (64 of 248 decks)
- Antagonize relevance 0.79 · 12.5% (31 of 248 decks)
- Titan's Strength relevance 0.74 · 12.5% (31 of 248 decks)
- Siege Smash relevance 0.72 · 15.7% (39 of 248 decks)
- Sure Strike relevance 0.71 · 12.1% (30 of 248 decks)
- Colossal Growth relevance 0.71 · 13.3% (33 of 248 decks)
- Brute Force relevance 0.70 · 12.5% (31 of 248 decks)
- Uncaged Fury relevance 0.68 · 12.1% (30 of 248 decks)
- Infuriate relevance 0.66 · 11.3% (28 of 248 decks)
- Blossoming Defense relevance 0.64 · 19.8% (49 of 248 decks)
- Bulk Up relevance 0.64 · 19.4% (48 of 248 decks)
- Bull's Strength relevance 0.63 · 9.3% (23 of 248 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.63 · 29.4% (73 of 248 decks)
- Fanatical Strength relevance 0.63 · 10.1% (25 of 248 decks)
- Charge Through relevance 0.58 · 12.5% (31 of 248 decks)
- Barge In relevance 0.58 · 8.9% (22 of 248 decks)
- Monstrous Rage relevance 0.53 · 11.7% (29 of 248 decks)
- Dreadmaw's Ire relevance 0.52 · 9.3% (23 of 248 decks)
- Blazing Crescendo relevance 0.50 · 9.7% (24 of 248 decks)
- Invigorate relevance 0.49 · 12.1% (30 of 248 decks)
- Twinferno relevance 0.47 · 10.1% (25 of 248 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.47 · 14.9% (37 of 248 decks)
- Reckless Ransacking relevance 0.47 · 8.5% (21 of 248 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.47 · 17.3% (43 of 248 decks)
- Unleash Fury relevance 0.46 · 14.9% (37 of 248 decks)
- Fists of Flame relevance 0.46 · 9.7% (24 of 248 decks)
- Expedite relevance 0.46 · 10.1% (25 of 248 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.44 · 10.9% (27 of 248 decks)
- Haste Magic relevance 0.44 · 8.1% (20 of 248 decks)
- Bestow Greatness relevance 0.44 · 6.9% (17 of 248 decks)
- Shock relevance 0.43 · 8.5% (21 of 248 decks)
- Gimli's Fury relevance 0.41 · 6.5% (16 of 248 decks)
- Staggering Size relevance 0.41 · 6.0% (15 of 248 decks)
- Tifa's Limit Break relevance 0.41 · 9.7% (24 of 248 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.41 · 10.1% (25 of 248 decks)
- Aggressive Urge relevance 0.41 · 7.7% (19 of 248 decks)
- Crimson Wisps relevance 0.40 · 8.1% (20 of 248 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Crash Through relevance 0.50 · 10.9% (27 of 248 decks)
All lands (4)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.68 · 29.8% (74 of 248 decks)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 0.60 · 19.0% (47 of 248 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.48 · 31.0% (77 of 248 decks)
- Timber Gorge relevance 0.46 · 12.1% (30 of 248 decks)
EDH data for Brute Strength: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 248 real decks.













































