Ruthless Cullblade
Played in 58 Mardu decks
Color Identity Spread
29.9% Mardu
-
Mardu 58 · 29.9%
-
Rakdos 54 · 27.8%
-
Black 45 · 23.2%
-
Orzhov 17 · 8.8%
-
Five-Color 5 · 2.6%
-
Grixis 4 · 2.1%
- Other (4) 11 · 5.7%
30+45+1+2+1+1+
All most relevant (30)
- Child of Night relevance 3.77 · 63.8% (37 of 58 decks)
- Bloodthrone Vampire relevance 3.49 · 63.8% (37 of 58 decks)
- Guul Draz Vampire relevance 3.45 · 53.4% (31 of 58 decks)
- Quag Vampires relevance 3.44 · 56.9% (33 of 58 decks)
- Stromkirk Condemned relevance 3.16 · 53.4% (31 of 58 decks)
- Vampire Lacerator relevance 2.97 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Pulse Tracker relevance 2.89 · 62.1% (36 of 58 decks)
- Vampire Interloper relevance 2.89 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
- Vampire Hexmage relevance 2.83 · 55.2% (32 of 58 decks)
- Malakir Cullblade relevance 2.59 · 39.7% (23 of 58 decks)
- Carrier Thrall relevance 2.57 · 39.7% (23 of 58 decks)
- Blood Seeker relevance 2.48 · 60.3% (35 of 58 decks)
- Olivia's Bloodsworn relevance 2.47 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
- Asylum Visitor relevance 2.43 · 41.4% (24 of 58 decks)
- Vampire Neonate relevance 2.41 · 41.4% (24 of 58 decks)
- Bloodcrazed Paladin relevance 2.30 · 39.7% (23 of 58 decks)
- Olivia, Mobilized for War relevance 2.19 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
- Olivia's Dragoon relevance 2.19 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
- Vampire Nighthawk relevance 2.09 · 67.2% (39 of 58 decks)
- Vampire Cutthroat relevance 2.06 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
- Bloodflow Connoisseur relevance 2.03 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
- Shadow Alley Denizen relevance 2.00 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
- Vicious Conquistador relevance 1.84 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
- Falkenrath Aristocrat relevance 1.79 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
- Dusk Legion Zealot relevance 1.72 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
- Voldaren Pariah // Abolisher of Bloodlines relevance 1.63 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Pawn of Ulamog relevance 1.60 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
- Stensia Masquerade relevance 1.51 · 41.4% (24 of 58 decks)
- Bloodcrazed Neonate relevance 1.42 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Stromkirk Noble relevance 1.39 · 31.0% (18 of 58 decks)
All creatures (45)
- Child of Night relevance 3.77 · 63.8% (37 of 58 decks)
- Bloodthrone Vampire relevance 3.49 · 63.8% (37 of 58 decks)
- Guul Draz Vampire relevance 3.45 · 53.4% (31 of 58 decks)
- Quag Vampires relevance 3.44 · 56.9% (33 of 58 decks)
- Stromkirk Condemned relevance 3.16 · 53.4% (31 of 58 decks)
- Vampire Lacerator relevance 2.97 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Pulse Tracker relevance 2.89 · 62.1% (36 of 58 decks)
- Vampire Interloper relevance 2.89 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
- Vampire Hexmage relevance 2.83 · 55.2% (32 of 58 decks)
- Malakir Cullblade relevance 2.59 · 39.7% (23 of 58 decks)
- Carrier Thrall relevance 2.57 · 39.7% (23 of 58 decks)
- Blood Seeker relevance 2.48 · 60.3% (35 of 58 decks)
- Olivia's Bloodsworn relevance 2.47 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
- Asylum Visitor relevance 2.43 · 41.4% (24 of 58 decks)
- Vampire Neonate relevance 2.41 · 41.4% (24 of 58 decks)
- Bloodcrazed Paladin relevance 2.30 · 39.7% (23 of 58 decks)
- Olivia, Mobilized for War relevance 2.19 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
- Olivia's Dragoon relevance 2.19 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
- Vampire Nighthawk relevance 2.09 · 67.2% (39 of 58 decks)
- Vampire Cutthroat relevance 2.06 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
- Bloodflow Connoisseur relevance 2.03 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
- Shadow Alley Denizen relevance 2.00 · 50.0% (29 of 58 decks)
- Vicious Conquistador relevance 1.84 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
- Falkenrath Aristocrat relevance 1.79 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
- Dusk Legion Zealot relevance 1.72 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
- Voldaren Pariah // Abolisher of Bloodlines relevance 1.63 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Pawn of Ulamog relevance 1.60 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
- Bloodcrazed Neonate relevance 1.42 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Stromkirk Noble relevance 1.39 · 31.0% (18 of 58 decks)
- Dark Impostor relevance 1.39 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Bloodlord of Vaasgoth relevance 1.38 · 31.0% (18 of 58 decks)
- Stromkirk Captain relevance 1.37 · 56.9% (33 of 58 decks)
- Kalastria Highborn relevance 1.36 · 29.3% (17 of 58 decks)
- Indulgent Aristocrat relevance 1.34 · 55.2% (32 of 58 decks)
- Legion Lieutenant relevance 1.33 · 53.4% (31 of 58 decks)
- Mirror Entity relevance 1.32 · 32.8% (19 of 58 decks)
- Falkenrath Gorger relevance 1.31 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Rakish Heir relevance 1.30 · 37.9% (22 of 58 decks)
- Blood Artist relevance 1.30 · 72.4% (42 of 58 decks)
- Gifted Aetherborn relevance 1.26 · 32.8% (19 of 58 decks)
- Falkenrath Noble relevance 1.21 · 32.8% (19 of 58 decks)
- Malakir Bloodwitch relevance 1.21 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
- Sanctum Seeker relevance 1.21 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Malakir Blood-Priest relevance 1.18 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Oathsworn Vampire relevance 1.17 · 32.8% (19 of 58 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Stensia Masquerade relevance 1.51 · 41.4% (24 of 58 decks)
All instants (2)
- Vampiric Fury relevance 1.28 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Rootborn Defenses relevance 1.17 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Ancient Craving relevance 1.33 · 24.1% (14 of 58 decks)
All lands (1)
- Aether Hub relevance 1.42 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
EDH data for Ruthless Cullblade: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 58 real decks.

























