Wrap in Flames
Played in 80 Izzet decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (1)
- Zara, Renegade Recruiter relevance 0.92 · 1.0% (3 of 290 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Blazing Volley relevance 1.15 · 32.5% (26 of 80 decks)
- Spitfire Lagac relevance 1.06 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Hazardous Blast relevance 1.02 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Smash to Dust relevance 1.00 · 26.3% (21 of 80 decks)
- Gimli, Counter of Kills relevance 0.99 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Barrage of Boulders relevance 0.89 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Tectonic Hazard relevance 0.83 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Circle of Flame relevance 0.82 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Gelectrode relevance 0.82 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Thermo-Alchemist relevance 0.81 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Cosmotronic Wave relevance 0.80 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- End the Festivities relevance 0.78 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Boiling Earth relevance 0.78 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Dual Shot relevance 0.76 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Tunneling Geopede relevance 0.75 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Prodigal Sorcerer relevance 0.74 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.71 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Dagger Caster relevance 0.70 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Chandra's Fury relevance 0.69 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Firebrand Archer relevance 0.68 · 30.0% (24 of 80 decks)
- Lobber Crew relevance 0.68 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Brimstone Trebuchet relevance 0.67 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Electrickery relevance 0.66 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Glassworks // Shattered Yard relevance 0.65 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Goblin Fireslinger relevance 0.65 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.64 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Quicksilver Dagger relevance 0.64 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Hissing Iguanar relevance 0.63 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Blisterspit Gremlin relevance 0.63 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Cast into the Fire relevance 0.63 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
All creatures (20)
- Spitfire Lagac relevance 1.06 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Gimli, Counter of Kills relevance 0.99 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Gelectrode relevance 0.82 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Thermo-Alchemist relevance 0.81 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Tunneling Geopede relevance 0.75 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Prodigal Sorcerer relevance 0.74 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.71 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Dagger Caster relevance 0.70 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Firebrand Archer relevance 0.68 · 30.0% (24 of 80 decks)
- Lobber Crew relevance 0.68 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Brimstone Trebuchet relevance 0.67 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Goblin Fireslinger relevance 0.65 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Hissing Iguanar relevance 0.63 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Blisterspit Gremlin relevance 0.63 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Unruly Catapult relevance 0.62 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Kindlespark Duo relevance 0.60 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Erebor Flamesmith relevance 0.56 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Niv-Mizzet, the Firemind relevance 0.55 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Cinder Pyromancer relevance 0.54 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Scalding Viper // Steam Clean relevance 0.52 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Izzet Cluestone relevance 0.58 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.54 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Circle of Flame relevance 0.82 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Glassworks // Shattered Yard relevance 0.65 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Quicksilver Dagger relevance 0.64 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Raid Bombardment relevance 0.57 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Impact Tremors relevance 0.55 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
All instants (7)
- Dual Shot relevance 0.76 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Chandra's Fury relevance 0.69 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Electrickery relevance 0.66 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.64 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Cast into the Fire relevance 0.63 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Geistflame relevance 0.62 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Fire // Ice relevance 0.50 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
All sorceries (9)
- Blazing Volley relevance 1.15 · 32.5% (26 of 80 decks)
- Hazardous Blast relevance 1.02 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Smash to Dust relevance 1.00 · 26.3% (21 of 80 decks)
- Barrage of Boulders relevance 0.89 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Tectonic Hazard relevance 0.83 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Cosmotronic Wave relevance 0.80 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- End the Festivities relevance 0.78 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Boiling Earth relevance 0.78 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Demolish relevance 0.61 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Desert relevance 0.50 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
All lands (6)
- Swiftwater Cliffs relevance 0.82 · 41.3% (33 of 80 decks)
- Eroded Canyon relevance 0.66 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Thriving Bluff relevance 0.65 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.59 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Izzet Guildgate relevance 0.56 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.53 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
EDH data for Wrap in Flames: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 80 real decks.