Oakenform
Played in 103 Simic decks
230+4+25+13+4+2+2+
Color Identity Spread
9.3% Simic
Commanders
Most Relevant
One With the Wind 25.2% of decks
One With the Wind 25.2% of decks
Setessan Training 29.1% of decks
Setessan Training 29.1% of decks
Cartouche of Knowledge 29.1% of decks
Cartouche of Knowledge 29.1% of decks
Cartouche of Strength 23.3% of decks
Cartouche of Strength 23.3% of decks
Blanchwood Armor 27.2% of decks
Blanchwood Armor 27.2% of decks
Ancestral Mask 31.1% of decks
Ancestral Mask 31.1% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Eutropia the Twice-Favored relevance 1.38 · 1.9% (6 of 317 decks)
- Beast, Erudite Aerialist relevance 0.52 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- One With the Wind relevance 1.73 · 25.2% (26 of 103 decks)
- Setessan Training relevance 1.66 · 29.1% (30 of 103 decks)
- Cartouche of Knowledge relevance 1.61 · 29.1% (30 of 103 decks)
- Cartouche of Strength relevance 1.49 · 23.3% (24 of 103 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 1.43 · 27.2% (28 of 103 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 1.40 · 31.1% (32 of 103 decks)
- Forced Adaptation relevance 1.34 · 24.3% (25 of 103 decks)
- Favor of the Overbeing relevance 1.25 · 23.3% (24 of 103 decks)
- Spider Umbra relevance 1.24 · 23.3% (24 of 103 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 1.19 · 27.2% (28 of 103 decks)
- Predatory Hunger relevance 1.16 · 17.5% (18 of 103 decks)
- Rancor relevance 1.14 · 27.2% (28 of 103 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 1.12 · 18.4% (19 of 103 decks)
- Ophidian Eye relevance 1.06 · 15.5% (16 of 103 decks)
- Arcane Flight relevance 1.04 · 15.5% (16 of 103 decks)
- Invigorate relevance 0.98 · 15.5% (16 of 103 decks)
- Arachnoform relevance 0.98 · 15.5% (16 of 103 decks)
- Security Bypass relevance 0.94 · 15.5% (16 of 103 decks)
- Frantic Strength relevance 0.90 · 13.6% (14 of 103 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.89 · 20.4% (21 of 103 decks)
- Eel Umbra relevance 0.86 · 18.4% (19 of 103 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.85 · 24.3% (25 of 103 decks)
- Aura Gnarlid relevance 0.85 · 12.6% (13 of 103 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.84 · 20.4% (21 of 103 decks)
- Traveler's Cloak relevance 0.83 · 13.6% (14 of 103 decks)
- Prey Upon relevance 0.78 · 12.6% (13 of 103 decks)
- Spell Rupture relevance 0.78 · 13.6% (14 of 103 decks)
- You Come to a River relevance 0.73 · 11.7% (12 of 103 decks)
- Gladecover Scout relevance 0.73 · 11.7% (12 of 103 decks)
- Starlit Mantle relevance 0.72 · 10.7% (11 of 103 decks)
All creatures (4)
- Aura Gnarlid relevance 0.85 · 12.6% (13 of 103 decks)
- Gladecover Scout relevance 0.73 · 11.7% (12 of 103 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 0.64 · 11.7% (12 of 103 decks)
- Silhana Ledgewalker relevance 0.58 · 9.7% (10 of 103 decks)
All enchantments (25)
- One With the Wind relevance 1.73 · 25.2% (26 of 103 decks)
- Setessan Training relevance 1.66 · 29.1% (30 of 103 decks)
- Cartouche of Knowledge relevance 1.61 · 29.1% (30 of 103 decks)
- Cartouche of Strength relevance 1.49 · 23.3% (24 of 103 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 1.43 · 27.2% (28 of 103 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 1.40 · 31.1% (32 of 103 decks)
- Forced Adaptation relevance 1.34 · 24.3% (25 of 103 decks)
- Favor of the Overbeing relevance 1.25 · 23.3% (24 of 103 decks)
- Spider Umbra relevance 1.24 · 23.3% (24 of 103 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 1.19 · 27.2% (28 of 103 decks)
- Predatory Hunger relevance 1.16 · 17.5% (18 of 103 decks)
- Rancor relevance 1.14 · 27.2% (28 of 103 decks)
- Ophidian Eye relevance 1.06 · 15.5% (16 of 103 decks)
- Arcane Flight relevance 1.04 · 15.5% (16 of 103 decks)
- Arachnoform relevance 0.98 · 15.5% (16 of 103 decks)
- Security Bypass relevance 0.94 · 15.5% (16 of 103 decks)
- Frantic Strength relevance 0.90 · 13.6% (14 of 103 decks)
- Eel Umbra relevance 0.86 · 18.4% (19 of 103 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.85 · 24.3% (25 of 103 decks)
- Traveler's Cloak relevance 0.83 · 13.6% (14 of 103 decks)
- Starlit Mantle relevance 0.72 · 10.7% (11 of 103 decks)
- Cloak of Mists relevance 0.70 · 10.7% (11 of 103 decks)
- Vow of Wildness relevance 0.55 · 8.7% (9 of 103 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf's Embrace relevance 0.54 · 8.7% (9 of 103 decks)
- Gift of Paradise relevance 0.54 · 9.7% (10 of 103 decks)
All instants (13)
- Titanic Growth relevance 1.12 · 18.4% (19 of 103 decks)
- Invigorate relevance 0.98 · 15.5% (16 of 103 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.89 · 20.4% (21 of 103 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.84 · 20.4% (21 of 103 decks)
- Spell Rupture relevance 0.78 · 13.6% (14 of 103 decks)
- You Come to a River relevance 0.73 · 11.7% (12 of 103 decks)
- Root Snare relevance 0.65 · 10.7% (11 of 103 decks)
- Vapor Snag relevance 0.61 · 9.7% (10 of 103 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.59 · 12.6% (13 of 103 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.59 · 11.7% (12 of 103 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.57 · 11.7% (12 of 103 decks)
- Blink of an Eye relevance 0.57 · 10.7% (11 of 103 decks)
- Plummet relevance 0.56 · 8.7% (9 of 103 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Prey Upon relevance 0.78 · 12.6% (13 of 103 decks)
- Divination relevance 0.62 · 11.7% (12 of 103 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.60 · 12.6% (13 of 103 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.55 · 20.4% (21 of 103 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.99 · 49.5% (51 of 103 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.59 · 23.3% (24 of 103 decks)
All lands (2)
- Woodland Stream relevance 1.02 · 31.1% (32 of 103 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.76 · 29.1% (30 of 103 decks)
EDH data for Oakenform: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 103 real decks.











































