Great-Horn Krushok
Played in 52 Selesnya decks
Color Identity Spread
46.4% Selesnya
- Selesnya 52 · 46.4%
- Azorius 31 · 27.7%
- White 22 · 19.6%
- Boros 3 · 2.7%
- Other (3) 4 · 3.6%
All commanders (2)
- Jasmine Boreal of the Seven relevance 2.62 · 1.1% (46 of 4,129 decks)
- Torsten Von Ursus relevance 0.65 · 4.5% (1 of 22 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Centaur Courser relevance 2.65 · 44.2% (23 of 52 decks)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 2.48 · 63.5% (33 of 52 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 2.44 · 63.5% (33 of 52 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.07 · 53.8% (28 of 52 decks)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 2.02 · 38.5% (20 of 52 decks)
- Colossodon Yearling relevance 1.94 · 30.8% (16 of 52 decks)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 1.93 · 50.0% (26 of 52 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 1.83 · 40.4% (21 of 52 decks)
- Armored Wolf-Rider relevance 1.81 · 32.7% (17 of 52 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 1.81 · 44.2% (23 of 52 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 1.79 · 44.2% (23 of 52 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 1.74 · 44.2% (23 of 52 decks)
- Oreskos Swiftclaw relevance 1.69 · 34.6% (18 of 52 decks)
- Craw Wurm relevance 1.67 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 1.65 · 30.8% (16 of 52 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 1.64 · 38.5% (20 of 52 decks)
- Dromoka Warrior relevance 1.56 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Devilthorn Fox relevance 1.56 · 34.6% (18 of 52 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 1.55 · 38.5% (20 of 52 decks)
- Hollowhenge Beast relevance 1.54 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Alpha Tyrranax relevance 1.52 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 1.50 · 36.5% (19 of 52 decks)
- Looming Altisaur relevance 1.42 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Silvercoat Lion relevance 1.41 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 1.41 · 32.7% (17 of 52 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 1.41 · 28.8% (15 of 52 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 1.34 · 28.8% (15 of 52 decks)
- Watchwolf relevance 1.33 · 34.6% (18 of 52 decks)
- Cowl Prowler relevance 1.32 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Cheeky House-Mouse // Squeak By relevance 1.31 · 28.8% (15 of 52 decks)
All creatures (49)
- Centaur Courser relevance 2.65 · 44.2% (23 of 52 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 2.44 · 63.5% (33 of 52 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.07 · 53.8% (28 of 52 decks)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 2.02 · 38.5% (20 of 52 decks)
- Colossodon Yearling relevance 1.94 · 30.8% (16 of 52 decks)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 1.93 · 50.0% (26 of 52 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 1.83 · 40.4% (21 of 52 decks)
- Armored Wolf-Rider relevance 1.81 · 32.7% (17 of 52 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 1.81 · 44.2% (23 of 52 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 1.79 · 44.2% (23 of 52 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 1.74 · 44.2% (23 of 52 decks)
- Oreskos Swiftclaw relevance 1.69 · 34.6% (18 of 52 decks)
- Craw Wurm relevance 1.67 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 1.65 · 30.8% (16 of 52 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 1.64 · 38.5% (20 of 52 decks)
- Dromoka Warrior relevance 1.56 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Devilthorn Fox relevance 1.56 · 34.6% (18 of 52 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 1.55 · 38.5% (20 of 52 decks)
- Hollowhenge Beast relevance 1.54 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Alpha Tyrranax relevance 1.52 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 1.50 · 36.5% (19 of 52 decks)
- Looming Altisaur relevance 1.42 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Silvercoat Lion relevance 1.41 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 1.41 · 32.7% (17 of 52 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 1.41 · 28.8% (15 of 52 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 1.34 · 28.8% (15 of 52 decks)
- Watchwolf relevance 1.33 · 34.6% (18 of 52 decks)
- Cowl Prowler relevance 1.32 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Cheeky House-Mouse // Squeak By relevance 1.31 · 28.8% (15 of 52 decks)
- Isamaru, Hound of Konda relevance 1.30 · 32.7% (17 of 52 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 1.30 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 1.29 · 30.8% (16 of 52 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 1.26 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 1.25 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Fang-Druid Summoner relevance 1.24 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Indomitable Ancients relevance 1.20 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 1.19 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Nessian Courser relevance 1.15 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Runeclaw Bear relevance 1.14 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Elvish Ranger relevance 1.13 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 1.07 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Savannah Lions relevance 1.06 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Sundial, Dawn Tyrant relevance 1.05 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Raptor Companion relevance 1.05 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Grizzled Leotau relevance 1.04 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Axebane Stag relevance 1.04 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Yoked Ox relevance 1.00 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Balduvian Bears relevance 0.96 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Tuinvale Treefolk // Oaken Boon relevance 0.95 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 2.48 · 63.5% (33 of 52 decks)
EDH data for Great-Horn Krushok: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 52 real decks.