Infernal Sovereign
Played in 236 Mardu decks
Color Identity Spread
230+44+3+3+
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Kaalia, Zenith Seeker relevance 1.44 · 2.1% (11 of 535 decks)
- Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.46 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Rune-Scarred Demon relevance 1.75 · 68.2% (161 of 236 decks)
- Liesa, Forgotten Archangel relevance 1.52 · 57.2% (135 of 236 decks)
- Demonlord Belzenlok relevance 1.37 · 32.2% (76 of 236 decks)
- Sephara, Sky's Blade relevance 1.34 · 47.5% (112 of 236 decks)
- Vilis, Broker of Blood relevance 1.29 · 44.5% (105 of 236 decks)
- The Speed Demon relevance 1.20 · 26.3% (62 of 236 decks)
- Gisela, Blade of Goldnight relevance 1.19 · 58.1% (137 of 236 decks)
- Archfiend of Depravity relevance 1.19 · 43.6% (103 of 236 decks)
- Rakdos, Patron of Chaos relevance 1.14 · 37.3% (88 of 236 decks)
- Dragon Tempest relevance 1.12 · 35.2% (83 of 236 decks)
- Valgavoth, Terror Eater relevance 1.03 · 32.6% (77 of 236 decks)
- Aurelia, the Warleader relevance 1.03 · 60.6% (143 of 236 decks)
- Razaketh, the Foulblooded relevance 1.03 · 31.4% (74 of 236 decks)
- Bloodgift Demon relevance 1.02 · 26.7% (63 of 236 decks)
- Archangel Avacyn // Avacyn, the Purifier relevance 0.93 · 22.5% (53 of 236 decks)
- Dragon Mage relevance 0.92 · 21.2% (50 of 236 decks)
- Avacyn, Angel of Hope relevance 0.92 · 36.4% (86 of 236 decks)
- Balefire Dragon relevance 0.92 · 31.8% (75 of 236 decks)
- Lord of the Void relevance 0.90 · 28.4% (67 of 236 decks)
- Painful Truths relevance 0.89 · 31.8% (75 of 236 decks)
- Harvester of Souls relevance 0.88 · 23.3% (55 of 236 decks)
- Master of Cruelties relevance 0.87 · 32.2% (76 of 236 decks)
- Earthquake relevance 0.86 · 17.8% (42 of 236 decks)
- Angelic Arbiter relevance 0.86 · 24.2% (57 of 236 decks)
- Scourge of the Throne relevance 0.84 · 23.3% (55 of 236 decks)
- Overseer of the Damned relevance 0.83 · 18.6% (44 of 236 decks)
- Archfiend of Despair relevance 0.83 · 25.0% (59 of 236 decks)
- Drakuseth, Maw of Flames relevance 0.83 · 25.8% (61 of 236 decks)
- Angel of the Ruins relevance 0.83 · 27.5% (65 of 236 decks)
- Bloodthirster relevance 0.82 · 22.5% (53 of 236 decks)
All creatures (44)
- Rune-Scarred Demon relevance 1.75 · 68.2% (161 of 236 decks)
- Liesa, Forgotten Archangel relevance 1.52 · 57.2% (135 of 236 decks)
- Demonlord Belzenlok relevance 1.37 · 32.2% (76 of 236 decks)
- Sephara, Sky's Blade relevance 1.34 · 47.5% (112 of 236 decks)
- Vilis, Broker of Blood relevance 1.29 · 44.5% (105 of 236 decks)
- The Speed Demon relevance 1.20 · 26.3% (62 of 236 decks)
- Gisela, Blade of Goldnight relevance 1.19 · 58.1% (137 of 236 decks)
- Archfiend of Depravity relevance 1.19 · 43.6% (103 of 236 decks)
- Rakdos, Patron of Chaos relevance 1.14 · 37.3% (88 of 236 decks)
- Valgavoth, Terror Eater relevance 1.03 · 32.6% (77 of 236 decks)
- Aurelia, the Warleader relevance 1.03 · 60.6% (143 of 236 decks)
- Razaketh, the Foulblooded relevance 1.03 · 31.4% (74 of 236 decks)
- Bloodgift Demon relevance 1.02 · 26.7% (63 of 236 decks)
- Archangel Avacyn // Avacyn, the Purifier relevance 0.93 · 22.5% (53 of 236 decks)
- Dragon Mage relevance 0.92 · 21.2% (50 of 236 decks)
- Avacyn, Angel of Hope relevance 0.92 · 36.4% (86 of 236 decks)
- Balefire Dragon relevance 0.92 · 31.8% (75 of 236 decks)
- Lord of the Void relevance 0.90 · 28.4% (67 of 236 decks)
- Harvester of Souls relevance 0.88 · 23.3% (55 of 236 decks)
- Master of Cruelties relevance 0.87 · 32.2% (76 of 236 decks)
- Angelic Arbiter relevance 0.86 · 24.2% (57 of 236 decks)
- Scourge of the Throne relevance 0.84 · 23.3% (55 of 236 decks)
- Overseer of the Damned relevance 0.83 · 18.6% (44 of 236 decks)
- Archfiend of Despair relevance 0.83 · 25.0% (59 of 236 decks)
- Drakuseth, Maw of Flames relevance 0.83 · 25.8% (61 of 236 decks)
- Angel of the Ruins relevance 0.83 · 27.5% (65 of 236 decks)
- Bloodthirster relevance 0.82 · 22.5% (53 of 236 decks)
- Serra's Emissary relevance 0.82 · 25.8% (61 of 236 decks)
- Mother of Runes relevance 0.79 · 30.1% (71 of 236 decks)
- Angel of Serenity relevance 0.78 · 22.5% (53 of 236 decks)
- Thunder Dragon relevance 0.78 · 12.3% (29 of 236 decks)
- Angel of Despair relevance 0.78 · 25.4% (60 of 236 decks)
- Skrelv, Defector Mite relevance 0.76 · 17.4% (41 of 236 decks)
- Hoarding Broodlord relevance 0.76 · 21.2% (50 of 236 decks)
- Ob Nixilis, Unshackled relevance 0.75 · 18.2% (43 of 236 decks)
- Steel Hellkite relevance 0.75 · 18.2% (43 of 236 decks)
- Bonehoard Dracosaur relevance 0.73 · 19.1% (45 of 236 decks)
- Hellkite Tyrant relevance 0.72 · 24.6% (58 of 236 decks)
- Sigarda's Vanguard relevance 0.71 · 11.9% (28 of 236 decks)
- Bruna, the Fading Light relevance 0.71 · 19.9% (47 of 236 decks)
- Piru, the Volatile relevance 0.71 · 16.9% (40 of 236 decks)
- Gisela, the Broken Blade relevance 0.70 · 19.1% (45 of 236 decks)
- Aegis Angel relevance 0.70 · 17.4% (41 of 236 decks)
- Neriv, Heart of the Storm relevance 0.69 · 22.5% (53 of 236 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Dragon Tempest relevance 1.12 · 35.2% (83 of 236 decks)
- Sneak Attack relevance 0.80 · 21.6% (51 of 236 decks)
- Unholy Annex // Ritual Chamber relevance 0.70 · 14.4% (34 of 236 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Painful Truths relevance 0.89 · 31.8% (75 of 236 decks)
- Earthquake relevance 0.86 · 17.8% (42 of 236 decks)
- Wheel of Misfortune relevance 0.73 · 16.5% (39 of 236 decks)
EDH data for Infernal Sovereign: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 236 real decks.





























