Thirsting Bloodlord
Played in 260 Black decks
1730+39+2+1+1+4+2+1+
Color Identity Spread
14.8% Black
-
Mardu 814 · 46.3%
-
Orzhov 289 · 16.4%
-
Rakdos 267 · 15.2%
-
Black 260 · 14.8%
-
Grixis 69 · 3.9%
- Other (9) 58 · 3.3%
Commanders
Anowon, the Ruin Sage 16.1% of decks
Anowon, the Ruin Sage 16.1% of decks
Drana, Liberator of Malakir 8.5% of decks
Drana, Liberator of Malakir 8.5% of decks
Vito, Thorn of the Dusk Rose 2.9% of decks
Vito, Thorn of the Dusk Rose 2.9% of decks
Timothar, Baron of Bats 8.9% of decks
Timothar, Baron of Bats 8.9% of decks
Nazar, the Velvet Fang 9.7% of decks
Nazar, the Velvet Fang 9.7% of decks
Drana, the Last Bloodchief 3.4% of decks
Drana, the Last Bloodchief 3.4% of decks
Most Relevant
Sanctum Seeker 60.8% of decks
Sanctum Seeker 60.8% of decks
Captivating Vampire 56.5% of decks
Captivating Vampire 56.5% of decks
Markov Baron 55.0% of decks
Markov Baron 55.0% of decks
Crossway Troublemakers 55.4% of decks
Crossway Troublemakers 55.4% of decks
Cordial Vampire 59.6% of decks
Cordial Vampire 59.6% of decks
Indulgent Aristocrat 47.3% of decks
Indulgent Aristocrat 47.3% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (17)
- Anowon, the Ruin Sage relevance 3.37 · 16.1% (33 of 205 decks)
- Drana, Liberator of Malakir relevance 2.87 · 8.5% (30 of 353 decks)
- Vito, Thorn of the Dusk Rose relevance 2.84 · 2.9% (85 of 2,947 decks)
- Timothar, Baron of Bats relevance 2.72 · 8.9% (24 of 271 decks)
- Nazar, the Velvet Fang relevance 1.68 · 9.7% (6 of 62 decks)
- Drana, the Last Bloodchief relevance 1.54 · 3.4% (9 of 264 decks)
- Kalitas, Bloodchief of Ghet relevance 1.39 · 9.8% (4 of 41 decks)
- Drana, Kalastria Bloodchief relevance 1.16 · 1.9% (7 of 375 decks)
- Henrika Domnathi // Henrika, Infernal Seer relevance 1.04 · 3.0% (4 of 132 decks)
- Mirri the Cursed relevance 0.95 · 3.7% (3 of 81 decks)
- Kalitas, Traitor of Ghet relevance 0.92 · 1.4% (5 of 349 decks)
- Falthis, Shadowcat Familiar // Sengir, the Dark Baron relevance 0.70 · 2.9% (2 of 69 decks)
- Tivash, Gloom Summoner relevance 0.64 · 1.1% (3 of 281 decks)
- Viconia, Drow Apostate relevance 0.53 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Sengir, the Dark Baron relevance 0.45 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- Baron Sengir relevance 0.40 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Vadmir, New Blood relevance 0.34 · 1.3% (1 of 78 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Sanctum Seeker relevance 2.92 · 60.8% (158 of 260 decks)
- Captivating Vampire relevance 2.87 · 56.5% (147 of 260 decks)
- Markov Baron relevance 2.79 · 55.0% (143 of 260 decks)
- Crossway Troublemakers relevance 2.76 · 55.4% (144 of 260 decks)
- Cordial Vampire relevance 2.74 · 59.6% (155 of 260 decks)
- Indulgent Aristocrat relevance 2.42 · 47.3% (123 of 260 decks)
- Bloodline Keeper // Lord of Lineage relevance 2.27 · 49.6% (129 of 260 decks)
- Bloodlord of Vaasgoth relevance 2.16 · 36.5% (95 of 260 decks)
- Patron of the Vein relevance 2.12 · 40.8% (106 of 260 decks)
- Olivia's Wrath relevance 2.12 · 37.7% (98 of 260 decks)
- Malakir Bloodwitch relevance 2.08 · 41.5% (108 of 260 decks)
- Vampire Nocturnus relevance 2.05 · 38.1% (99 of 260 decks)
- Vampire of the Dire Moon relevance 1.91 · 48.8% (127 of 260 decks)
- Champion of Dusk relevance 1.91 · 35.4% (92 of 260 decks)
- Vampire Nighthawk relevance 1.82 · 60.0% (156 of 260 decks)
- Kalastria Highborn relevance 1.82 · 33.5% (87 of 260 decks)
- Necropolis Regent relevance 1.76 · 40.0% (104 of 260 decks)
- Sorin, Imperious Bloodlord relevance 1.73 · 33.1% (86 of 260 decks)
- Bloodthirsty Aerialist relevance 1.73 · 38.1% (99 of 260 decks)
- Urge to Feed relevance 1.71 · 28.5% (74 of 260 decks)
- Anowon, the Ruin Sage relevance 1.48 · 28.1% (73 of 260 decks)
- Gifted Aetherborn relevance 1.46 · 40.8% (106 of 260 decks)
- Feast of Blood relevance 1.43 · 24.6% (64 of 260 decks)
- Bloodline Necromancer relevance 1.43 · 25.4% (66 of 260 decks)
- Marauding Blight-Priest relevance 1.34 · 50.4% (131 of 260 decks)
- Blood Seeker relevance 1.31 · 30.4% (79 of 260 decks)
- Blood Tribute relevance 1.31 · 28.8% (75 of 260 decks)
- Bloodbond Vampire relevance 1.30 · 23.5% (61 of 260 decks)
- New Blood relevance 1.28 · 21.5% (56 of 260 decks)
- Drana, Liberator of Malakir relevance 1.23 · 31.9% (83 of 260 decks)
All creatures (39)
- Sanctum Seeker relevance 2.92 · 60.8% (158 of 260 decks)
- Captivating Vampire relevance 2.87 · 56.5% (147 of 260 decks)
- Markov Baron relevance 2.79 · 55.0% (143 of 260 decks)
- Crossway Troublemakers relevance 2.76 · 55.4% (144 of 260 decks)
- Cordial Vampire relevance 2.74 · 59.6% (155 of 260 decks)
- Indulgent Aristocrat relevance 2.42 · 47.3% (123 of 260 decks)
- Bloodline Keeper // Lord of Lineage relevance 2.27 · 49.6% (129 of 260 decks)
- Bloodlord of Vaasgoth relevance 2.16 · 36.5% (95 of 260 decks)
- Patron of the Vein relevance 2.12 · 40.8% (106 of 260 decks)
- Malakir Bloodwitch relevance 2.08 · 41.5% (108 of 260 decks)
- Vampire Nocturnus relevance 2.05 · 38.1% (99 of 260 decks)
- Vampire of the Dire Moon relevance 1.91 · 48.8% (127 of 260 decks)
- Champion of Dusk relevance 1.91 · 35.4% (92 of 260 decks)
- Vampire Nighthawk relevance 1.82 · 60.0% (156 of 260 decks)
- Kalastria Highborn relevance 1.82 · 33.5% (87 of 260 decks)
- Necropolis Regent relevance 1.76 · 40.0% (104 of 260 decks)
- Bloodthirsty Aerialist relevance 1.73 · 38.1% (99 of 260 decks)
- Anowon, the Ruin Sage relevance 1.48 · 28.1% (73 of 260 decks)
- Gifted Aetherborn relevance 1.46 · 40.8% (106 of 260 decks)
- Bloodline Necromancer relevance 1.43 · 25.4% (66 of 260 decks)
- Marauding Blight-Priest relevance 1.34 · 50.4% (131 of 260 decks)
- Blood Seeker relevance 1.31 · 30.4% (79 of 260 decks)
- Bloodbond Vampire relevance 1.30 · 23.5% (61 of 260 decks)
- Drana, Liberator of Malakir relevance 1.23 · 31.9% (83 of 260 decks)
- Vicious Conquistador relevance 1.20 · 18.5% (48 of 260 decks)
- Nullpriest of Oblivion relevance 1.14 · 27.3% (71 of 260 decks)
- Stromkirk Bloodthief relevance 1.13 · 20.0% (52 of 260 decks)
- Creeping Bloodsucker relevance 1.10 · 33.8% (88 of 260 decks)
- Drana, the Last Bloodchief relevance 1.08 · 21.9% (57 of 260 decks)
- Falkenrath Noble relevance 1.06 · 32.3% (84 of 260 decks)
- Malakir Cullblade relevance 1.05 · 17.7% (46 of 260 decks)
- Knight of the Ebon Legion relevance 1.05 · 20.0% (52 of 260 decks)
- Henrika Domnathi // Henrika, Infernal Seer relevance 1.03 · 21.9% (57 of 260 decks)
- Gatekeeper of Malakir relevance 1.02 · 20.0% (52 of 260 decks)
- Defiant Bloodlord relevance 1.01 · 23.5% (61 of 260 decks)
- Veinwitch Coven relevance 1.00 · 25.0% (65 of 260 decks)
- Nighthawk Scavenger relevance 1.00 · 31.2% (81 of 260 decks)
- Sanguine Syphoner relevance 0.99 · 20.8% (54 of 260 decks)
- Kalitas, Bloodchief of Ghet relevance 0.99 · 15.8% (41 of 260 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Glass-Cast Heart relevance 1.21 · 21.2% (55 of 260 decks)
- Blade of the Bloodchief relevance 1.21 · 28.8% (75 of 260 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Gift of Fangs relevance 1.12 · 17.3% (45 of 260 decks)
All instants (1)
- Urge to Feed relevance 1.71 · 28.5% (74 of 260 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Olivia's Wrath relevance 2.12 · 37.7% (98 of 260 decks)
- Feast of Blood relevance 1.43 · 24.6% (64 of 260 decks)
- Blood Tribute relevance 1.31 · 28.8% (75 of 260 decks)
- New Blood relevance 1.28 · 21.5% (56 of 260 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Sorin, Imperious Bloodlord relevance 1.73 · 33.1% (86 of 260 decks)
- Sorin the Mirthless relevance 0.99 · 18.5% (48 of 260 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Voldaren Estate relevance 1.20 · 20.4% (53 of 260 decks)
EDH data for Thirsting Bloodlord: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 260 real decks.



































