Storm the Seedcore
Played in 84 Witch-Maw decks
Color Identity Spread
All most relevant (30)
- Phyrexian Awakening relevance 1.35 · 38.1% (32 of 84 decks)
- Elvish Vatkeeper relevance 1.21 · 28.6% (24 of 84 decks)
- Norn's Inquisitor relevance 1.10 · 28.6% (24 of 84 decks)
- Tangled Skyline relevance 1.09 · 26.2% (22 of 84 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 1.07 · 41.7% (35 of 84 decks)
- Glissa, Herald of Predation relevance 1.04 · 33.3% (28 of 84 decks)
- Sunfall relevance 1.00 · 31.0% (26 of 84 decks)
- Eyes of Gitaxias relevance 0.97 · 20.2% (17 of 84 decks)
- Glistening Dawn relevance 0.96 · 22.6% (19 of 84 decks)
- Brimaz, Blight of Oreskos relevance 0.93 · 31.0% (26 of 84 decks)
- Sculpted Perfection relevance 0.91 · 22.6% (19 of 84 decks)
- Gift of Compleation relevance 0.91 · 20.2% (17 of 84 decks)
- Assimilate Essence relevance 0.90 · 19.0% (16 of 84 decks)
- Blighted Burgeoning relevance 0.88 · 20.2% (17 of 84 decks)
- Converter Beast relevance 0.87 · 17.9% (15 of 84 decks)
- Essence of Orthodoxy relevance 0.86 · 22.6% (19 of 84 decks)
- Progenitor Exarch relevance 0.85 · 21.4% (18 of 84 decks)
- Fertilid's Favor relevance 0.85 · 13.1% (11 of 84 decks)
- Chrome Host Seedshark relevance 0.84 · 22.6% (19 of 84 decks)
- Botanical Brawler relevance 0.84 · 16.7% (14 of 84 decks)
- Sunder the Gateway relevance 0.82 · 19.0% (16 of 84 decks)
- Tiller of Flesh relevance 0.80 · 15.5% (13 of 84 decks)
- Elesh Norn // The Argent Etchings relevance 0.80 · 27.4% (23 of 84 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.80 · 27.4% (23 of 84 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.79 · 29.8% (25 of 84 decks)
- Bloated Processor relevance 0.78 · 17.9% (15 of 84 decks)
- Angelic Intervention relevance 0.73 · 11.9% (10 of 84 decks)
- Corruption of Towashi relevance 0.71 · 15.5% (13 of 84 decks)
- Evolving Adaptive relevance 0.70 · 14.3% (12 of 84 decks)
- Atraxa's Skitterfang relevance 0.69 · 16.7% (14 of 84 decks)
All creatures (20)
- Elvish Vatkeeper relevance 1.21 · 28.6% (24 of 84 decks)
- Norn's Inquisitor relevance 1.10 · 28.6% (24 of 84 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 1.07 · 41.7% (35 of 84 decks)
- Glissa, Herald of Predation relevance 1.04 · 33.3% (28 of 84 decks)
- Brimaz, Blight of Oreskos relevance 0.93 · 31.0% (26 of 84 decks)
- Converter Beast relevance 0.87 · 17.9% (15 of 84 decks)
- Essence of Orthodoxy relevance 0.86 · 22.6% (19 of 84 decks)
- Progenitor Exarch relevance 0.85 · 21.4% (18 of 84 decks)
- Chrome Host Seedshark relevance 0.84 · 22.6% (19 of 84 decks)
- Botanical Brawler relevance 0.84 · 16.7% (14 of 84 decks)
- Tiller of Flesh relevance 0.80 · 15.5% (13 of 84 decks)
- Elesh Norn // The Argent Etchings relevance 0.80 · 27.4% (23 of 84 decks)
- Bloated Processor relevance 0.78 · 17.9% (15 of 84 decks)
- Evolving Adaptive relevance 0.70 · 14.3% (12 of 84 decks)
- Atraxa's Skitterfang relevance 0.69 · 16.7% (14 of 84 decks)
- Phyrexian Censor relevance 0.66 · 22.6% (19 of 84 decks)
- Grafted Butcher relevance 0.66 · 16.7% (14 of 84 decks)
- Compleated Huntmaster relevance 0.63 · 13.1% (11 of 84 decks)
- Ichor Drinker relevance 0.61 · 11.9% (10 of 84 decks)
- Scheming Aspirant relevance 0.60 · 22.6% (19 of 84 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.80 · 27.4% (23 of 84 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Phyrexian Awakening relevance 1.35 · 38.1% (32 of 84 decks)
- Tangled Skyline relevance 1.09 · 26.2% (22 of 84 decks)
- Sculpted Perfection relevance 0.91 · 22.6% (19 of 84 decks)
- Gift of Compleation relevance 0.91 · 20.2% (17 of 84 decks)
- Blighted Burgeoning relevance 0.88 · 20.2% (17 of 84 decks)
- Corruption of Towashi relevance 0.71 · 15.5% (13 of 84 decks)
All instants (6)
- Assimilate Essence relevance 0.90 · 19.0% (16 of 84 decks)
- Fertilid's Favor relevance 0.85 · 13.1% (11 of 84 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.79 · 29.8% (25 of 84 decks)
- Angelic Intervention relevance 0.73 · 11.9% (10 of 84 decks)
- Merciless Repurposing relevance 0.66 · 11.9% (10 of 84 decks)
- Surge of Salvation relevance 0.60 · 10.7% (9 of 84 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Sunfall relevance 1.00 · 31.0% (26 of 84 decks)
- Eyes of Gitaxias relevance 0.97 · 20.2% (17 of 84 decks)
- Glistening Dawn relevance 0.96 · 22.6% (19 of 84 decks)
- Sunder the Gateway relevance 0.82 · 19.0% (16 of 84 decks)
- Expand the Sphere relevance 0.68 · 23.8% (20 of 84 decks)
- Vat Emergence relevance 0.60 · 19.0% (16 of 84 decks)
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Moag // Bloomwielder Dryads relevance 0.60 · 9.5% (8 of 84 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- The Surgical Bay relevance 0.79 · 17.9% (15 of 84 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.63 · 21.4% (18 of 84 decks)
- The Seedcore relevance 0.62 · 25.0% (21 of 84 decks)
All lands (7)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 1.10 · 31.0% (26 of 84 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 1.03 · 29.8% (25 of 84 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.89 · 25.0% (21 of 84 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.81 · 22.6% (19 of 84 decks)
- Scoured Barrens relevance 0.76 · 21.4% (18 of 84 decks)
- Tranquil Cove relevance 0.74 · 20.2% (17 of 84 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.60 · 32.1% (27 of 84 decks)
EDH data for Storm the Seedcore: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 84 real decks.