Prismatic Ward
Played in 48 Azorius decks
130+6+1+25+10+7+1+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
Power Sink 47.9% of decks
Power Sink 47.9% of decks
Pentarch Ward 43.8% of decks
Pentarch Ward 43.8% of decks
Reconstruction 37.5% of decks
Reconstruction 37.5% of decks
Energy Flux 37.5% of decks
Energy Flux 37.5% of decks
Drain Power 35.4% of decks
Drain Power 35.4% of decks
Righteous Aura 35.4% of decks
Righteous Aura 35.4% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Pippin, Guard of the Citadel relevance 0.49 · 1.1% (1 of 92 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Power Sink relevance 2.96 · 47.9% (23 of 48 decks)
- Pentarch Ward relevance 2.63 · 43.8% (21 of 48 decks)
- Reconstruction relevance 2.52 · 37.5% (18 of 48 decks)
- Energy Flux relevance 2.42 · 37.5% (18 of 48 decks)
- Drain Power relevance 2.37 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Righteous Aura relevance 2.35 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Robe of Mirrors relevance 2.29 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Circle of Protection: Red relevance 2.24 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Patrician's Scorn relevance 2.23 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Ranger of Eos relevance 2.19 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Chill relevance 2.19 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Portent relevance 2.18 · 39.6% (19 of 48 decks)
- Plagiarize relevance 2.16 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Knightly Valor relevance 2.15 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Pollen Lullaby relevance 2.15 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Invisibility relevance 2.14 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Portcullis relevance 2.14 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Awesome Presence relevance 2.12 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Divine Favor relevance 2.11 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Recall relevance 2.10 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Prismatic Ending relevance 2.09 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Curse of Echoes relevance 2.09 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Patron Wizard relevance 2.09 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Soul Barrier relevance 2.09 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Primordial Mist relevance 2.08 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Press the Enemy relevance 2.07 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Ardent Plea relevance 2.06 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Primary Research relevance 2.06 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Prodigal Sorcerer relevance 2.06 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Fool's Demise relevance 2.06 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
All creatures (6)
- Ranger of Eos relevance 2.19 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Patron Wizard relevance 2.09 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Prodigal Sorcerer relevance 2.06 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Peacekeeper relevance 2.05 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Patriot, Shield Wielder relevance 2.01 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- Abbey Gargoyles relevance 1.99 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Portcullis relevance 2.14 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
All enchantments (25)
- Pentarch Ward relevance 2.63 · 43.8% (21 of 48 decks)
- Energy Flux relevance 2.42 · 37.5% (18 of 48 decks)
- Righteous Aura relevance 2.35 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Robe of Mirrors relevance 2.29 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Circle of Protection: Red relevance 2.24 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Chill relevance 2.19 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Knightly Valor relevance 2.15 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Invisibility relevance 2.14 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Awesome Presence relevance 2.12 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Divine Favor relevance 2.11 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Curse of Echoes relevance 2.09 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Soul Barrier relevance 2.09 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Primordial Mist relevance 2.08 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Ardent Plea relevance 2.06 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Primary Research relevance 2.06 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Fool's Demise relevance 2.06 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Lifelink relevance 2.03 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Patient Rebuilding relevance 2.02 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Prison Sentence relevance 2.02 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Bonds of Faith relevance 2.00 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- Confiscate relevance 2.00 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Protective Bubble relevance 1.99 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Glaring Aegis relevance 1.98 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- Martyr's Bond relevance 1.98 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- Equilibrium relevance 1.98 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
All instants (10)
- Power Sink relevance 2.96 · 47.9% (23 of 48 decks)
- Patrician's Scorn relevance 2.23 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Plagiarize relevance 2.16 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Pollen Lullaby relevance 2.15 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Press the Enemy relevance 2.07 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Hydroblast relevance 2.05 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 2.01 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 2.01 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 1.99 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- Remove Soul relevance 1.98 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Reconstruction relevance 2.52 · 37.5% (18 of 48 decks)
- Drain Power relevance 2.37 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Portent relevance 2.18 · 39.6% (19 of 48 decks)
- Recall relevance 2.10 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Prismatic Ending relevance 2.09 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Fade Away relevance 2.05 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Entrancing Melody relevance 2.01 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Ice Floe relevance 1.98 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
EDH data for Prismatic Ward: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 48 real decks.









































