Guildmages' Forum
Played in 225 Witch-Maw decks
Color Identity Spread
3.4% Witch-Maw
- Grixis 1,432 · 21.4%
- Five-Color 1,228 · 18.4%
- Boros 437 · 6.5%
- Golgari 389 · 5.8%
- Simic 272 · 4.1%
- Naya 259 · 3.9%
- Witch-Maw 225 · 3.4%
- Gruul 222 · 3.3%
- Selesnya 205 · 3.1%
- Ink-Treader 204 · 3.1%
- Mardu 188 · 2.8%
- Temur 172 · 2.6%
- Azorius 164 · 2.5%
- Bant 163 · 2.4%
- Rakdos 155 · 2.3%
- Orzhov 152 · 2.3%
- Sultai 144 · 2.2%
- Izzet 138 · 2.1%
- Other (14) 537 · 8.0%
Commanders
1
Commanders
1All commanders (1)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker relevance 0.66 · 1.3% (15 of 1,132 decks)
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30All most relevant (30)
- Fathom Mage relevance 1.34 · 57.8% (130 of 225 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 1.30 · 45.3% (102 of 225 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 1.28 · 55.1% (124 of 225 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 1.24 · 37.3% (84 of 225 decks)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 1.18 · 43.1% (97 of 225 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 1.13 · 49.8% (112 of 225 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 1.09 · 41.3% (93 of 225 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 1.07 · 40.4% (91 of 225 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 1.07 · 27.6% (62 of 225 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 1.03 · 35.1% (79 of 225 decks)
- Pir, Imaginative Rascal relevance 0.99 · 30.7% (69 of 225 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.98 · 32.9% (74 of 225 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.97 · 25.8% (58 of 225 decks)
- Winding Constrictor relevance 0.96 · 32.4% (73 of 225 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.94 · 31.6% (71 of 225 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.91 · 30.7% (69 of 225 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.89 · 27.1% (61 of 225 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 0.85 · 56.9% (128 of 225 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.81 · 20.0% (45 of 225 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.79 · 24.9% (56 of 225 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.79 · 27.6% (62 of 225 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.74 · 22.7% (51 of 225 decks)
- Plaxcaster Frogling relevance 0.74 · 15.1% (34 of 225 decks)
- Ghave, Guru of Spores relevance 0.74 · 18.2% (41 of 225 decks)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 0.73 · 43.1% (97 of 225 decks)
- Loyal Guardian relevance 0.70 · 14.7% (33 of 225 decks)
- Shalai, Voice of Plenty relevance 0.70 · 31.1% (70 of 225 decks)
- Brokers Ascendancy relevance 0.69 · 40.0% (90 of 225 decks)
- Abzan Ascendancy relevance 0.69 · 14.2% (32 of 225 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.69 · 20.0% (45 of 225 decks)
Creatures
24
Creatures
24 All creatures (24)
- Fathom Mage relevance 1.34 · 57.8% (130 of 225 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 1.30 · 45.3% (102 of 225 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 1.28 · 55.1% (124 of 225 decks)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 1.18 · 43.1% (97 of 225 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 1.07 · 40.4% (91 of 225 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 1.07 · 27.6% (62 of 225 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 1.03 · 35.1% (79 of 225 decks)
- Pir, Imaginative Rascal relevance 0.99 · 30.7% (69 of 225 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.97 · 25.8% (58 of 225 decks)
- Winding Constrictor relevance 0.96 · 32.4% (73 of 225 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.91 · 30.7% (69 of 225 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.89 · 27.1% (61 of 225 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.81 · 20.0% (45 of 225 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.79 · 24.9% (56 of 225 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.79 · 27.6% (62 of 225 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.74 · 22.7% (51 of 225 decks)
- Plaxcaster Frogling relevance 0.74 · 15.1% (34 of 225 decks)
- Ghave, Guru of Spores relevance 0.74 · 18.2% (41 of 225 decks)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 0.73 · 43.1% (97 of 225 decks)
- Loyal Guardian relevance 0.70 · 14.7% (33 of 225 decks)
- Shalai, Voice of Plenty relevance 0.70 · 31.1% (70 of 225 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.69 · 20.0% (45 of 225 decks)
- Juniper Order Ranger relevance 0.66 · 15.1% (34 of 225 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.64 · 21.3% (48 of 225 decks)
Artifacts
2
Artifacts
2 All artifacts (2)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 0.85 · 56.9% (128 of 225 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.64 · 40.0% (90 of 225 decks)
Enchantments
7
Enchantments
7 All enchantments (7)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 1.24 · 37.3% (84 of 225 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 1.13 · 49.8% (112 of 225 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.98 · 32.9% (74 of 225 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.94 · 31.6% (71 of 225 decks)
- Brokers Ascendancy relevance 0.69 · 40.0% (90 of 225 decks)
- Abzan Ascendancy relevance 0.69 · 14.2% (32 of 225 decks)
- Citadel Siege relevance 0.63 · 14.2% (32 of 225 decks)
Instants
1
Instants
1 All instants (1)
- Inspiring Call relevance 1.09 · 41.3% (93 of 225 decks)
Sorceries
1
Sorceries
1 All sorceries (1)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.67 · 51.6% (116 of 225 decks)
Utility Lands
4
Utility Lands
4 All utility lands (4)
- Opal Palace relevance 1.75 · 59.6% (134 of 225 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.90 · 30.7% (69 of 225 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.86 · 20.4% (46 of 225 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.66 · 24.9% (56 of 225 decks)
Lands
11
Lands
11 All lands (11)
- Vivid Grove relevance 0.91 · 29.3% (66 of 225 decks)
- Vivid Creek relevance 0.91 · 28.9% (65 of 225 decks)
- Vivid Marsh relevance 0.85 · 24.9% (56 of 225 decks)
- Vivid Meadow relevance 0.84 · 25.3% (57 of 225 decks)
- Arcane Sanctum relevance 0.76 · 43.6% (98 of 225 decks)
- Aether Hub relevance 0.75 · 17.3% (39 of 225 decks)
- Seaside Citadel relevance 0.73 · 44.0% (99 of 225 decks)
- Opulent Palace relevance 0.72 · 46.2% (104 of 225 decks)
- Mirrodin's Core relevance 0.68 · 16.0% (36 of 225 decks)
- Sandsteppe Citadel relevance 0.64 · 40.9% (92 of 225 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.64 · 30.7% (69 of 225 decks)
EDH data for Guildmages' Forum: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 225 real decks.



















































