Wu Infantry
Played in 28 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
33.7% Azorius
- Blue 37 · 44.6%
- Azorius 28 · 33.7%
- Grixis 7 · 8.4%
- Five-Color 5 · 6.0%
- Other (6) 6 · 7.2%
All commanders (3)
- Tobias Andrion relevance 1.54 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Kasimir the Lone Wolf relevance 0.78 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen relevance 0.66 · 2.4% (1 of 41 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Words of Wind relevance 4.49 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Yoked Ox relevance 4.15 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Wizened Mentor relevance 3.91 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Wishing Well relevance 3.91 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Wrangler of the Damned relevance 3.90 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Worldpurge relevance 3.90 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Worship relevance 3.90 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Words of Worship relevance 3.88 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Wharf Infiltrator relevance 3.87 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Wondrous Crucible relevance 3.86 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Workshop Elders relevance 3.85 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Will Kenrith relevance 3.83 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Wall of Stolen Identity relevance 3.78 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Wizard's Spellbook relevance 3.75 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Whispers of the Muse relevance 3.69 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Wrench relevance 3.69 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Whirlpool Rider relevance 3.69 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Wurmwall Sweeper relevance 3.69 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Wreck Remover relevance 3.68 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Wave of Reckoning relevance 3.68 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Young Blue Dragon // Sand Augury relevance 3.67 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Water Whip relevance 3.66 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Wiretapping relevance 3.65 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 3.65 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Watertrap Weaver relevance 3.63 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Wall of Shards relevance 3.62 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- We Ride at Dawn relevance 3.58 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Whispering Wizard relevance 3.57 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Whirlwind Technique relevance 3.57 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 3.56 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
All creatures (23)
- Yoked Ox relevance 4.15 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Wizened Mentor relevance 3.91 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Wrangler of the Damned relevance 3.90 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Wharf Infiltrator relevance 3.87 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Workshop Elders relevance 3.85 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Wall of Stolen Identity relevance 3.78 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Whirlpool Rider relevance 3.69 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Wreck Remover relevance 3.68 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Young Blue Dragon // Sand Augury relevance 3.67 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Watertrap Weaver relevance 3.63 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Wall of Shards relevance 3.62 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Whispering Wizard relevance 3.57 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 3.56 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Wispmare relevance 3.55 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Warren Warleader relevance 3.54 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Zephyr Singer relevance 3.54 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Worthy Knight relevance 3.51 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Wonderscape Sage relevance 3.48 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Windstorm Drake relevance 3.47 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Zeriam, Golden Wind relevance 3.45 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Wayspeaker Bodyguard relevance 3.43 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 3.40 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Winter Eladrin relevance 3.39 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Wishing Well relevance 3.91 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Wondrous Crucible relevance 3.86 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Wizard's Spellbook relevance 3.75 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Wrench relevance 3.69 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Wurmwall Sweeper relevance 3.69 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
All enchantments (7)
- Words of Wind relevance 4.49 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Worship relevance 3.90 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Words of Worship relevance 3.88 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Wiretapping relevance 3.65 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- We Ride at Dawn relevance 3.58 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Weftwalking relevance 3.40 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Zur's Weirding relevance 3.38 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
All instants (4)
- Whispers of the Muse relevance 3.69 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Whirlwind Technique relevance 3.57 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Wheel and Deal relevance 3.40 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Zimone's Hypothesis relevance 3.37 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Worldpurge relevance 3.90 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Wave of Reckoning relevance 3.68 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Water Whip relevance 3.66 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 3.65 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Wrath of the Skies relevance 3.49 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Empty City Ruse relevance 3.40 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Will Kenrith relevance 3.83 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Vronos, Masked Inquisitor relevance 3.42 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Winding Canyons relevance 3.72 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Witch's Clinic relevance 3.52 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
All lands (1)
- White Lotus Hideout relevance 3.45 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
EDH data for Wu Infantry: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 28 real decks.