Opal Lake Gatekeepers
Played in 233 Five-Color decks
Color Identity Spread
42.1% Five-Color
- Five-Color 233 · 42.1%
- Sultai 224 · 40.5%
- Azorius 31 · 5.6%
- Simic 14 · 2.5%
- Other (14) 51 · 9.2%
Most Relevant
All most relevant (24)
- Gatekeeper Gargoyle relevance 5.16 · 77.3% (180 of 233 decks)
- Gateway Sneak relevance 4.93 · 76.8% (179 of 233 decks)
- Gatebreaker Ram relevance 4.89 · 85.4% (199 of 233 decks)
- Gate Colossus relevance 4.81 · 90.1% (210 of 233 decks)
- Hold the Gates relevance 4.64 · 77.3% (180 of 233 decks)
- Glaive of the Guildpact relevance 4.37 · 71.7% (167 of 233 decks)
- Gates Ablaze relevance 4.30 · 82.8% (193 of 233 decks)
- Archway Angel relevance 4.25 · 63.1% (147 of 233 decks)
- Gatecreeper Vine relevance 4.15 · 87.6% (204 of 233 decks)
- Guild Summit relevance 4.01 · 86.3% (201 of 233 decks)
- District Guide relevance 3.95 · 78.5% (183 of 233 decks)
- Crackling Perimeter relevance 3.88 · 65.2% (152 of 233 decks)
- Greenside Watcher relevance 3.84 · 59.2% (138 of 233 decks)
- Open the Gates relevance 3.61 · 89.3% (208 of 233 decks)
- Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 3.50 · 74.7% (174 of 233 decks)
- Navigation Orb relevance 3.27 · 72.1% (168 of 233 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 3.12 · 88.8% (207 of 233 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 3.03 · 69.5% (162 of 233 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 3.01 · 61.8% (144 of 233 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.44 · 40.3% (94 of 233 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.32 · 36.5% (85 of 233 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 1.12 · 26.6% (62 of 233 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.09 · 23.6% (55 of 233 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.06 · 28.3% (66 of 233 decks)
All creatures (11)
- Gatekeeper Gargoyle relevance 5.16 · 77.3% (180 of 233 decks)
- Gateway Sneak relevance 4.93 · 76.8% (179 of 233 decks)
- Gatebreaker Ram relevance 4.89 · 85.4% (199 of 233 decks)
- Gate Colossus relevance 4.81 · 90.1% (210 of 233 decks)
- Archway Angel relevance 4.25 · 63.1% (147 of 233 decks)
- Gatecreeper Vine relevance 4.15 · 87.6% (204 of 233 decks)
- District Guide relevance 3.95 · 78.5% (183 of 233 decks)
- Greenside Watcher relevance 3.84 · 59.2% (138 of 233 decks)
- Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 3.50 · 74.7% (174 of 233 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 3.01 · 61.8% (144 of 233 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.06 · 28.3% (66 of 233 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Glaive of the Guildpact relevance 4.37 · 71.7% (167 of 233 decks)
- Navigation Orb relevance 3.27 · 72.1% (168 of 233 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.32 · 36.5% (85 of 233 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Hold the Gates relevance 4.64 · 77.3% (180 of 233 decks)
- Guild Summit relevance 4.01 · 86.3% (201 of 233 decks)
- Crackling Perimeter relevance 3.88 · 65.2% (152 of 233 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Gates Ablaze relevance 4.30 · 82.8% (193 of 233 decks)
- Open the Gates relevance 3.61 · 89.3% (208 of 233 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 3.12 · 88.8% (207 of 233 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 3.03 · 69.5% (162 of 233 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.44 · 40.3% (94 of 233 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 1.12 · 26.6% (62 of 233 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.09 · 23.6% (55 of 233 decks)
All utility lands (6)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 3.40 · 88.8% (207 of 233 decks)
- Maze's End relevance 3.34 · 94.8% (221 of 233 decks)
- Heap Gate relevance 3.19 · 85.0% (198 of 233 decks)
- Plaza of Harmony relevance 3.06 · 67.4% (157 of 233 decks)
- The Black Gate relevance 2.64 · 60.5% (141 of 233 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 2.14 · 55.8% (130 of 233 decks)
All lands (20)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 3.35 · 98.3% (229 of 233 decks)
- Izzet Guildgate relevance 3.32 · 97.9% (228 of 233 decks)
- Golgari Guildgate relevance 3.32 · 98.7% (230 of 233 decks)
- Boros Guildgate relevance 3.30 · 97.0% (226 of 233 decks)
- Azorius Guildgate relevance 3.30 · 98.3% (229 of 233 decks)
- Rakdos Guildgate relevance 3.30 · 95.7% (223 of 233 decks)
- Orzhov Guildgate relevance 3.30 · 96.1% (224 of 233 decks)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 3.27 · 97.0% (226 of 233 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 3.26 · 97.0% (226 of 233 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 3.26 · 97.4% (227 of 233 decks)
- Baldur's Gate relevance 3.14 · 88.8% (207 of 233 decks)
- Gateway Plaza relevance 3.14 · 89.3% (208 of 233 decks)
- Gond Gate relevance 3.09 · 88.4% (206 of 233 decks)
- Cliffgate relevance 3.06 · 85.8% (200 of 233 decks)
- Citadel Gate relevance 3.01 · 84.5% (197 of 233 decks)
- Sea Gate relevance 3.00 · 84.1% (196 of 233 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 2.97 · 84.5% (197 of 233 decks)
- Black Dragon Gate relevance 2.94 · 83.3% (194 of 233 decks)
- Thran Portal relevance 2.67 · 61.8% (144 of 233 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 1.20 · 27.5% (64 of 233 decks)
EDH data for Opal Lake Gatekeepers: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 233 real decks.