Bestial Bloodline
Played in 250 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
27.0% Green
All commanders (25)
- Michelangelo, Improviser relevance 1.72 · 3.9% (13 of 337 decks)
- Thrun, the Last Troll relevance 1.33 · 2.6% (9 of 351 decks)
- Grunn, the Lonely King relevance 1.21 · 2.2% (8 of 365 decks)
- Thrun, Breaker of Silence relevance 1.17 · 1.1% (14 of 1,249 decks)
- Diamond Weapon relevance 1.17 · 2.0% (8 of 406 decks)
- Autumn Willow relevance 1.09 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.88 · 1.0% (7 of 667 decks)
- Wolfsbane, Highland Hero relevance 0.87 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.84 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Beorn, Reluctant Host // Till and Tend relevance 0.80 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Go-Shintai of Boundless Vigor relevance 0.53 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.50 · 1.3% (2 of 157 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.48 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.47 · 4.5% (1 of 22 decks)
- Rick Jones, Destined Sidekick relevance 0.44 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Jugan, the Rising Star relevance 0.43 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.42 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- Polukranos, World Eater relevance 0.37 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Syr Faren, the Hengehammer relevance 0.36 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
- Mister Immortal relevance 0.36 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
- Captain Kathryn Janeway relevance 0.34 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Anthousa, Setessan Hero relevance 0.34 · 1.5% (1 of 66 decks)
- Harold and Bob, First Numens relevance 0.31 · 1.3% (1 of 79 decks)
- Michelangelo, Mutant BFF relevance 0.31 · 1.3% (1 of 80 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.29 · 1.1% (1 of 95 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Arachnoform relevance 0.99 · 16.0% (40 of 250 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.90 · 38.8% (97 of 250 decks)
- Boar Umbra relevance 0.90 · 21.2% (53 of 250 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.87 · 21.6% (54 of 250 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 0.84 · 20.4% (51 of 250 decks)
- Audacity relevance 0.82 · 19.6% (49 of 250 decks)
- Forced Adaptation relevance 0.81 · 18.4% (46 of 250 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.80 · 24.8% (62 of 250 decks)
- Silken Strength relevance 0.72 · 12.0% (30 of 250 decks)
- Tanglespan Lookout relevance 0.66 · 12.4% (31 of 250 decks)
- Airtight Alibi relevance 0.63 · 10.0% (25 of 250 decks)
- Crystal Carapace relevance 0.62 · 10.8% (27 of 250 decks)
- Oakenform relevance 0.62 · 9.6% (24 of 250 decks)
- Spider Umbra relevance 0.62 · 15.6% (39 of 250 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.61 · 18.0% (45 of 250 decks)
- Curse of the Werefox relevance 0.61 · 10.0% (25 of 250 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.61 · 20.4% (51 of 250 decks)
- Talons of Wildwood relevance 0.60 · 10.4% (26 of 250 decks)
- Commune with Spirits relevance 0.59 · 9.6% (24 of 250 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.57 · 15.2% (38 of 250 decks)
- Enchantress's Presence relevance 0.56 · 12.8% (32 of 250 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.54 · 16.8% (42 of 250 decks)
- Meltstrider's Resolve relevance 0.54 · 12.0% (30 of 250 decks)
- Cartouche of Strength relevance 0.53 · 10.8% (27 of 250 decks)
- Trollhide relevance 0.53 · 8.8% (22 of 250 decks)
- Favor of Jukai relevance 0.52 · 7.6% (19 of 250 decks)
- Aspect of Wolf relevance 0.51 · 8.0% (20 of 250 decks)
- Aether Web relevance 0.50 · 7.6% (19 of 250 decks)
- Frantic Strength relevance 0.50 · 9.6% (24 of 250 decks)
- Hydra's Growth relevance 0.49 · 16.4% (41 of 250 decks)
All creatures (3)
- Tanglespan Lookout relevance 0.66 · 12.4% (31 of 250 decks)
- Almighty Brushwagg relevance 0.46 · 6.8% (17 of 250 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 0.44 · 10.0% (25 of 250 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Galadhrim Bow relevance 0.48 · 8.4% (21 of 250 decks)
- Bramble Armor relevance 0.45 · 6.8% (17 of 250 decks)
All enchantments (36)
- Arachnoform relevance 0.99 · 16.0% (40 of 250 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.90 · 38.8% (97 of 250 decks)
- Boar Umbra relevance 0.90 · 21.2% (53 of 250 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 0.84 · 20.4% (51 of 250 decks)
- Audacity relevance 0.82 · 19.6% (49 of 250 decks)
- Forced Adaptation relevance 0.81 · 18.4% (46 of 250 decks)
- Silken Strength relevance 0.72 · 12.0% (30 of 250 decks)
- Airtight Alibi relevance 0.63 · 10.0% (25 of 250 decks)
- Crystal Carapace relevance 0.62 · 10.8% (27 of 250 decks)
- Oakenform relevance 0.62 · 9.6% (24 of 250 decks)
- Spider Umbra relevance 0.62 · 15.6% (39 of 250 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.61 · 18.0% (45 of 250 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.61 · 20.4% (51 of 250 decks)
- Talons of Wildwood relevance 0.60 · 10.4% (26 of 250 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.57 · 15.2% (38 of 250 decks)
- Enchantress's Presence relevance 0.56 · 12.8% (32 of 250 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.54 · 16.8% (42 of 250 decks)
- Meltstrider's Resolve relevance 0.54 · 12.0% (30 of 250 decks)
- Cartouche of Strength relevance 0.53 · 10.8% (27 of 250 decks)
- Trollhide relevance 0.53 · 8.8% (22 of 250 decks)
- Favor of Jukai relevance 0.52 · 7.6% (19 of 250 decks)
- Aspect of Wolf relevance 0.51 · 8.0% (20 of 250 decks)
- Aether Web relevance 0.50 · 7.6% (19 of 250 decks)
- Frantic Strength relevance 0.50 · 9.6% (24 of 250 decks)
- Hydra's Growth relevance 0.49 · 16.4% (41 of 250 decks)
- Find the Path relevance 0.48 · 8.0% (20 of 250 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf's Embrace relevance 0.48 · 9.6% (24 of 250 decks)
- Indomitable Might relevance 0.47 · 12.0% (30 of 250 decks)
- Grafted Growth relevance 0.47 · 8.4% (21 of 250 decks)
- Rune of Might relevance 0.46 · 9.2% (23 of 250 decks)
- Abundant Growth relevance 0.46 · 10.4% (26 of 250 decks)
- Ordeal of Nylea relevance 0.45 · 11.6% (29 of 250 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.45 · 17.6% (44 of 250 decks)
- Crystalline Armor relevance 0.44 · 11.2% (28 of 250 decks)
- Howl of the Hunt relevance 0.43 · 6.8% (17 of 250 decks)
- Keen Sense relevance 0.43 · 11.2% (28 of 250 decks)
All instants (5)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.87 · 21.6% (54 of 250 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.80 · 24.8% (62 of 250 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.47 · 14.0% (35 of 250 decks)
- Leaping Ambush relevance 0.46 · 8.4% (21 of 250 decks)
- Arbor Armament relevance 0.44 · 7.6% (19 of 250 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Curse of the Werefox relevance 0.61 · 10.0% (25 of 250 decks)
- Commune with Spirits relevance 0.59 · 9.6% (24 of 250 decks)
- Kapow! relevance 0.47 · 8.4% (21 of 250 decks)
- Abundant Harvest relevance 0.44 · 10.0% (25 of 250 decks)
EDH data for Bestial Bloodline: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 250 real decks.