Crack in Time
Played in 103 Witch-Maw decks
Color Identity Spread
3.0% Witch-Maw
Most Relevant
All most relevant (30)
- Four Knocks relevance 2.50 · 50.5% (52 of 103 decks)
- Out of Time relevance 1.75 · 35.0% (36 of 103 decks)
- Parallax Wave relevance 1.35 · 28.2% (29 of 103 decks)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 1.33 · 73.8% (76 of 103 decks)
- Lux Cannon relevance 1.23 · 32.0% (33 of 103 decks)
- Saproling Burst relevance 1.16 · 18.4% (19 of 103 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 1.05 · 34.0% (35 of 103 decks)
- Mutational Advantage relevance 0.98 · 34.0% (35 of 103 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 0.94 · 63.1% (65 of 103 decks)
- Pentad Prism relevance 0.93 · 28.2% (29 of 103 decks)
- Patrolling Peacemaker relevance 0.93 · 33.0% (34 of 103 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.92 · 57.3% (59 of 103 decks)
- Dawn of a New Age relevance 0.91 · 19.4% (20 of 103 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.91 · 41.7% (43 of 103 decks)
- Parallax Nexus relevance 0.86 · 13.6% (14 of 103 decks)
- Tome of Legends relevance 0.86 · 17.5% (18 of 103 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.84 · 34.0% (35 of 103 decks)
- Transmogrifying Wand relevance 0.83 · 16.5% (17 of 103 decks)
- Grateful Apparition relevance 0.81 · 35.9% (37 of 103 decks)
- Parallax Tide relevance 0.79 · 13.6% (14 of 103 decks)
- Lulu, Stern Guardian relevance 0.78 · 22.3% (23 of 103 decks)
- Pyramid of the Pantheon relevance 0.77 · 15.5% (16 of 103 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.75 · 25.2% (26 of 103 decks)
- Ezuri, Stalker of Spheres relevance 0.74 · 61.2% (63 of 103 decks)
- Resourceful Defense relevance 0.73 · 22.3% (23 of 103 decks)
- Darksteel Reactor relevance 0.72 · 18.4% (19 of 103 decks)
- Empowered Autogenerator relevance 0.71 · 17.5% (18 of 103 decks)
- Flesh Duplicate relevance 0.70 · 17.5% (18 of 103 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.68 · 46.6% (48 of 103 decks)
- Tidus, Yuna's Guardian relevance 0.68 · 20.4% (21 of 103 decks)
All creatures (8)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 1.33 · 73.8% (76 of 103 decks)
- Patrolling Peacemaker relevance 0.93 · 33.0% (34 of 103 decks)
- Grateful Apparition relevance 0.81 · 35.9% (37 of 103 decks)
- Lulu, Stern Guardian relevance 0.78 · 22.3% (23 of 103 decks)
- Ezuri, Stalker of Spheres relevance 0.74 · 61.2% (63 of 103 decks)
- Flesh Duplicate relevance 0.70 · 17.5% (18 of 103 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.68 · 46.6% (48 of 103 decks)
- Tidus, Yuna's Guardian relevance 0.68 · 20.4% (21 of 103 decks)
All artifacts (13)
- Lux Cannon relevance 1.23 · 32.0% (33 of 103 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 0.94 · 63.1% (65 of 103 decks)
- Pentad Prism relevance 0.93 · 28.2% (29 of 103 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.92 · 57.3% (59 of 103 decks)
- Tome of Legends relevance 0.86 · 17.5% (18 of 103 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.84 · 34.0% (35 of 103 decks)
- Transmogrifying Wand relevance 0.83 · 16.5% (17 of 103 decks)
- Pyramid of the Pantheon relevance 0.77 · 15.5% (16 of 103 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.75 · 25.2% (26 of 103 decks)
- Darksteel Reactor relevance 0.72 · 18.4% (19 of 103 decks)
- Empowered Autogenerator relevance 0.71 · 17.5% (18 of 103 decks)
- Gavel of the Righteous relevance 0.62 · 12.6% (13 of 103 decks)
- Magistrate's Scepter relevance 0.61 · 18.4% (19 of 103 decks)
All enchantments (10)
- Four Knocks relevance 2.50 · 50.5% (52 of 103 decks)
- Out of Time relevance 1.75 · 35.0% (36 of 103 decks)
- Parallax Wave relevance 1.35 · 28.2% (29 of 103 decks)
- Saproling Burst relevance 1.16 · 18.4% (19 of 103 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 1.05 · 34.0% (35 of 103 decks)
- Dawn of a New Age relevance 0.91 · 19.4% (20 of 103 decks)
- Parallax Nexus relevance 0.86 · 13.6% (14 of 103 decks)
- Parallax Tide relevance 0.79 · 13.6% (14 of 103 decks)
- Resourceful Defense relevance 0.73 · 22.3% (23 of 103 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.63 · 52.4% (54 of 103 decks)
All instants (3)
- Mutational Advantage relevance 0.98 · 34.0% (35 of 103 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.91 · 41.7% (43 of 103 decks)
- Atomize relevance 0.61 · 26.2% (27 of 103 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 1.08 · 40.8% (42 of 103 decks)
- Diamond City relevance 0.66 · 13.6% (14 of 103 decks)
All lands (14)
- Remote Farm relevance 1.24 · 30.1% (31 of 103 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 1.22 · 30.1% (31 of 103 decks)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 1.18 · 29.1% (30 of 103 decks)
- Peat Bog relevance 1.17 · 29.1% (30 of 103 decks)
- Vivid Meadow relevance 1.13 · 34.0% (35 of 103 decks)
- Vivid Marsh relevance 1.13 · 33.0% (34 of 103 decks)
- Vivid Grove relevance 1.12 · 35.9% (37 of 103 decks)
- Vivid Creek relevance 1.06 · 34.0% (35 of 103 decks)
- Gemstone Mine relevance 1.03 · 35.0% (36 of 103 decks)
- Tendo Ice Bridge relevance 0.78 · 18.4% (19 of 103 decks)
- Mirrodin's Core relevance 0.74 · 17.5% (18 of 103 decks)
- Dreadship Reef relevance 0.73 · 22.3% (23 of 103 decks)
- Calciform Pools relevance 0.73 · 19.4% (20 of 103 decks)
- Saltcrusted Steppe relevance 0.68 · 18.4% (19 of 103 decks)
EDH data for Crack in Time: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 103 real decks.