Cling to Dust
Played in 2,158 Black decks
Color Identity Spread
23.2% Black
All commanders (30)
- Toshiro Umezawa relevance 3.36 · 21.7% (236 of 1,089 decks)
- Kaervek, the Punisher relevance 3.15 · 24.7% (137 of 555 decks)
- Blitzwing, Cruel Tormentor // Blitzwing, Adaptive Assailant relevance 2.92 · 37.4% (58 of 155 decks)
- Gisa, the Hellraiser relevance 2.47 · 8.2% (258 of 3,135 decks)
- Fandaniel, Telophoroi Ascian relevance 2.05 · 8.5% (93 of 1,089 decks)
- The Destined Black Mage relevance 1.90 · 11.1% (45 of 407 decks)
- Acererak the Archlich relevance 1.58 · 5.6% (63 of 1,124 decks)
- Gollum, Obsessed Stalker relevance 1.31 · 4.6% (43 of 937 decks)
- Vito, Thorn of the Dusk Rose relevance 1.22 · 2.9% (83 of 2,887 decks)
- Baron Helmut Zemo relevance 1.08 · 2.7% (54 of 1,972 decks)
- K'rrik, Son of Yawgmoth relevance 1.01 · 1.5% (183 of 11,857 decks)
- Tourach, Dread Cantor relevance 0.94 · 4.6% (14 of 303 decks)
- Erebos, Bleak-Hearted relevance 0.91 · 4.8% (12 of 251 decks)
- Sheoldred, the Apocalypse relevance 0.79 · 1.3% (96 of 7,429 decks)
- Vilis, Broker of Blood relevance 0.77 · 2.8% (16 of 573 decks)
- Erebos, God of the Dead relevance 0.68 · 2.1% (18 of 876 decks)
- The Master of Lake-town relevance 0.63 · 2.0% (15 of 738 decks)
- Doctor Doom, Unrivaled relevance 0.61 · 1.7% (18 of 1,043 decks)
- Moseo, Vein's New Dean relevance 0.61 · 1.4% (29 of 2,128 decks)
- Falthis, Shadowcat Familiar // Tormod, the Desecrator relevance 0.59 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- The Sackville-Bagginses relevance 0.59 · 5.1% (4 of 78 decks)
- Kagemaro, First to Suffer relevance 0.57 · 4.8% (4 of 84 decks)
- Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Falthis, Shadowcat Familiar relevance 0.53 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Isareth the Awakener relevance 0.52 · 5.6% (3 of 54 decks)
- Starscream, Power Hungry // Starscream, Seeker Leader relevance 0.51 · 1.6% (12 of 743 decks)
- Vadmir, New Blood relevance 0.45 · 3.9% (3 of 76 decks)
- Rankle, Master of Pranks relevance 0.41 · 1.5% (8 of 543 decks)
- Safana, Calimport Cutthroat // Agent of the Shadow Thieves relevance 0.39 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Citizen V, Helmut Zemo relevance 0.39 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Tivash, Gloom Summoner relevance 0.38 · 1.8% (5 of 275 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Cremate relevance 1.50 · 34.2% (739 of 2,158 decks)
- Aphotic Wisps relevance 0.83 · 17.7% (383 of 2,158 decks)
- Consuming Corruption relevance 0.80 · 39.8% (858 of 2,158 decks)
- Sedgemoor Witch relevance 0.66 · 16.1% (348 of 2,158 decks)
- Malicious Affliction relevance 0.60 · 15.1% (325 of 2,158 decks)
- Bitter Triumph relevance 0.58 · 25.6% (553 of 2,158 decks)
- Force of Despair relevance 0.58 · 21.6% (466 of 2,158 decks)
- Night's Whisper relevance 0.58 · 41.0% (885 of 2,158 decks)
- Cut Down relevance 0.57 · 16.0% (345 of 2,158 decks)
- Snuff Out relevance 0.56 · 29.9% (645 of 2,158 decks)
- Bubbling Muck relevance 0.55 · 29.1% (629 of 2,158 decks)
- Tragic Slip relevance 0.55 · 30.2% (652 of 2,158 decks)
- Dismember relevance 0.53 · 23.1% (498 of 2,158 decks)
- Defile relevance 0.53 · 44.0% (949 of 2,158 decks)
- Professor Onyx relevance 0.53 · 17.8% (384 of 2,158 decks)
- Duress relevance 0.53 · 18.6% (402 of 2,158 decks)
- Fatal Push relevance 0.52 · 15.5% (335 of 2,158 decks)
- Inquisition of Kozilek relevance 0.52 · 12.7% (273 of 2,158 decks)
- Nowhere to Run relevance 0.51 · 14.9% (321 of 2,158 decks)
- March of Wretched Sorrow relevance 0.50 · 11.0% (238 of 2,158 decks)
- Dark Petition relevance 0.49 · 14.6% (314 of 2,158 decks)
- Go for the Throat relevance 0.49 · 30.8% (664 of 2,158 decks)
- Blood Pact relevance 0.48 · 13.8% (298 of 2,158 decks)
- Dread Presence relevance 0.47 · 20.8% (448 of 2,158 decks)
- Tendrils of Agony relevance 0.47 · 12.6% (272 of 2,158 decks)
- Sheoldred's Edict relevance 0.47 · 24.7% (534 of 2,158 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.47 · 28.7% (620 of 2,158 decks)
- Infernal Grasp relevance 0.47 · 31.6% (682 of 2,158 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.47 · 19.6% (423 of 2,158 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.47 · 31.6% (681 of 2,158 decks)
All creatures (7)
- Sedgemoor Witch relevance 0.66 · 16.1% (348 of 2,158 decks)
- Dread Presence relevance 0.47 · 20.8% (448 of 2,158 decks)
- Murderous Rider // Swift End relevance 0.46 · 15.1% (325 of 2,158 decks)
- Fandaniel, Telophoroi Ascian relevance 0.46 · 9.6% (207 of 2,158 decks)
- Kaervek, the Punisher relevance 0.46 · 11.4% (246 of 2,158 decks)
- Morbid Opportunist relevance 0.38 · 27.1% (585 of 2,158 decks)
- Withered Wretch relevance 0.38 · 8.4% (181 of 2,158 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.47 · 19.6% (423 of 2,158 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.43 · 30.9% (666 of 2,158 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.39 · 15.5% (335 of 2,158 decks)
- Séance Board relevance 0.38 · 8.6% (186 of 2,158 decks)
- Nihil Spellbomb relevance 0.38 · 7.9% (171 of 2,158 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Nowhere to Run relevance 0.51 · 14.9% (321 of 2,158 decks)
All instants (25)
- Cremate relevance 1.50 · 34.2% (739 of 2,158 decks)
- Aphotic Wisps relevance 0.83 · 17.7% (383 of 2,158 decks)
- Consuming Corruption relevance 0.80 · 39.8% (858 of 2,158 decks)
- Malicious Affliction relevance 0.60 · 15.1% (325 of 2,158 decks)
- Bitter Triumph relevance 0.58 · 25.6% (553 of 2,158 decks)
- Force of Despair relevance 0.58 · 21.6% (466 of 2,158 decks)
- Cut Down relevance 0.57 · 16.0% (345 of 2,158 decks)
- Snuff Out relevance 0.56 · 29.9% (645 of 2,158 decks)
- Tragic Slip relevance 0.55 · 30.2% (652 of 2,158 decks)
- Dismember relevance 0.53 · 23.1% (498 of 2,158 decks)
- Defile relevance 0.53 · 44.0% (949 of 2,158 decks)
- Fatal Push relevance 0.52 · 15.5% (335 of 2,158 decks)
- March of Wretched Sorrow relevance 0.50 · 11.0% (238 of 2,158 decks)
- Go for the Throat relevance 0.49 · 30.8% (664 of 2,158 decks)
- Blood Pact relevance 0.48 · 13.8% (298 of 2,158 decks)
- Sheoldred's Edict relevance 0.47 · 24.7% (534 of 2,158 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.47 · 28.7% (620 of 2,158 decks)
- Infernal Grasp relevance 0.47 · 31.6% (682 of 2,158 decks)
- Doom Blade relevance 0.43 · 14.7% (318 of 2,158 decks)
- Long Goodbye relevance 0.42 · 8.4% (181 of 2,158 decks)
- Succumb to Temptation relevance 0.41 · 9.0% (194 of 2,158 decks)
- Imp's Mischief relevance 0.41 · 29.4% (635 of 2,158 decks)
- Hostile Negotiations relevance 0.39 · 8.0% (172 of 2,158 decks)
- Liliana's Triumph relevance 0.38 · 12.9% (278 of 2,158 decks)
- Archenemy's Charm relevance 0.38 · 15.5% (335 of 2,158 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Night's Whisper relevance 0.58 · 41.0% (885 of 2,158 decks)
- Bubbling Muck relevance 0.55 · 29.1% (629 of 2,158 decks)
- Duress relevance 0.53 · 18.6% (402 of 2,158 decks)
- Inquisition of Kozilek relevance 0.52 · 12.7% (273 of 2,158 decks)
- Dark Petition relevance 0.49 · 14.6% (314 of 2,158 decks)
- Tendrils of Agony relevance 0.47 · 12.6% (272 of 2,158 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.47 · 31.6% (681 of 2,158 decks)
- Insatiable Avarice relevance 0.46 · 19.4% (418 of 2,158 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Professor Onyx relevance 0.53 · 17.8% (384 of 2,158 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.41 · 24.6% (531 of 2,158 decks)
- Boggart Trawler // Boggart Bog relevance 0.40 · 17.0% (366 of 2,158 decks)
- Malakir Rebirth // Malakir Mire relevance 0.39 · 26.7% (576 of 2,158 decks)
EDH data for Cling to Dust: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 2,158 real decks.