Omen
Played in 208 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (14)
- God-Eternal Kefnet relevance 1.10 · 2.3% (6 of 264 decks)
- Fblthp, the Lost relevance 1.09 · 1.8% (7 of 384 decks)
- Dungeon Delver // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.67 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Taniwha relevance 0.67 · 1.4% (3 of 212 decks)
- Clan Crafter // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.65 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.61 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 0.59 · 2.0% (2 of 101 decks)
- Master Pakku relevance 0.59 · 1.9% (2 of 103 decks)
- Hurkyl, Master Wizard relevance 0.57 · 1.7% (2 of 116 decks)
- Ixidor, Reality Sculptor relevance 0.50 · 1.2% (2 of 168 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.47 · 1.0% (2 of 197 decks)
- Barrin, Tolarian Archmage relevance 0.34 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Ertai, Wizard Adept relevance 0.32 · 1.3% (1 of 80 decks)
- Tomorrow, Azami's Familiar relevance 0.29 · 1.0% (1 of 99 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Portent relevance 1.24 · 28.8% (60 of 208 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 1.13 · 43.3% (90 of 208 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 1.09 · 27.4% (57 of 208 decks)
- Peek relevance 1.06 · 29.8% (62 of 208 decks)
- Opt relevance 1.00 · 66.3% (138 of 208 decks)
- Obsessive Search relevance 0.97 · 22.1% (46 of 208 decks)
- Reach Through Mists relevance 0.89 · 16.8% (35 of 208 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.87 · 65.4% (136 of 208 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.86 · 56.3% (117 of 208 decks)
- Sorcerous Sight relevance 0.83 · 13.9% (29 of 208 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.82 · 23.6% (49 of 208 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.81 · 41.8% (87 of 208 decks)
- Quicken relevance 0.81 · 17.8% (37 of 208 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.81 · 25.0% (52 of 208 decks)
- Telling Time relevance 0.78 · 16.8% (35 of 208 decks)
- Index relevance 0.76 · 13.5% (28 of 208 decks)
- Anticipate relevance 0.73 · 17.8% (37 of 208 decks)
- Hithlain Knots relevance 0.71 · 14.9% (31 of 208 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.67 · 16.8% (35 of 208 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.66 · 16.8% (35 of 208 decks)
- Dream Cache relevance 0.65 · 13.0% (27 of 208 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.63 · 27.4% (57 of 208 decks)
- Scour All Possibilities relevance 0.59 · 12.0% (25 of 208 decks)
- Clairvoyance relevance 0.56 · 9.6% (20 of 208 decks)
- Refocus relevance 0.56 · 12.5% (26 of 208 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.54 · 22.1% (46 of 208 decks)
- Sphinx-Bone Wand relevance 0.53 · 8.7% (18 of 208 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.52 · 15.4% (32 of 208 decks)
- See Beyond relevance 0.52 · 10.6% (22 of 208 decks)
- Lier, Disciple of the Drowned relevance 0.50 · 14.4% (30 of 208 decks)
All creatures (4)
- Lier, Disciple of the Drowned relevance 0.50 · 14.4% (30 of 208 decks)
- Murmuring Mystic relevance 0.49 · 19.2% (40 of 208 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.47 · 18.3% (38 of 208 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.41 · 17.8% (37 of 208 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Sphinx-Bone Wand relevance 0.53 · 8.7% (18 of 208 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Dress Down relevance 0.42 · 10.1% (21 of 208 decks)
All instants (24)
- Deliberate relevance 1.09 · 27.4% (57 of 208 decks)
- Peek relevance 1.06 · 29.8% (62 of 208 decks)
- Opt relevance 1.00 · 66.3% (138 of 208 decks)
- Obsessive Search relevance 0.97 · 22.1% (46 of 208 decks)
- Reach Through Mists relevance 0.89 · 16.8% (35 of 208 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.81 · 41.8% (87 of 208 decks)
- Quicken relevance 0.81 · 17.8% (37 of 208 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.81 · 25.0% (52 of 208 decks)
- Telling Time relevance 0.78 · 16.8% (35 of 208 decks)
- Anticipate relevance 0.73 · 17.8% (37 of 208 decks)
- Hithlain Knots relevance 0.71 · 14.9% (31 of 208 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.67 · 16.8% (35 of 208 decks)
- Clairvoyance relevance 0.56 · 9.6% (20 of 208 decks)
- Refocus relevance 0.56 · 12.5% (26 of 208 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.52 · 15.4% (32 of 208 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.47 · 14.4% (30 of 208 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.45 · 27.4% (57 of 208 decks)
- Leap relevance 0.45 · 13.0% (27 of 208 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.45 · 18.3% (38 of 208 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.44 · 12.5% (26 of 208 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.43 · 13.5% (28 of 208 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.41 · 13.9% (29 of 208 decks)
- Ray of Erasure relevance 0.40 · 6.7% (14 of 208 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.40 · 12.0% (25 of 208 decks)
All sorceries (18)
- Portent relevance 1.24 · 28.8% (60 of 208 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 1.13 · 43.3% (90 of 208 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.87 · 65.4% (136 of 208 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.86 · 56.3% (117 of 208 decks)
- Sorcerous Sight relevance 0.83 · 13.9% (29 of 208 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.82 · 23.6% (49 of 208 decks)
- Index relevance 0.76 · 13.5% (28 of 208 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.66 · 16.8% (35 of 208 decks)
- Dream Cache relevance 0.65 · 13.0% (27 of 208 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.63 · 27.4% (57 of 208 decks)
- Scour All Possibilities relevance 0.59 · 12.0% (25 of 208 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.54 · 22.1% (46 of 208 decks)
- See Beyond relevance 0.52 · 10.6% (22 of 208 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 0.48 · 10.1% (21 of 208 decks)
- Birthday Escape relevance 0.46 · 9.6% (20 of 208 decks)
- Shimmer of Possibility relevance 0.44 · 7.2% (15 of 208 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.42 · 16.8% (35 of 208 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.40 · 12.5% (26 of 208 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.50 · 24.0% (50 of 208 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.45 · 17.8% (37 of 208 decks)
EDH data for Omen: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 208 real decks.