Cut In
Played in 55 Boros decks
330+12+6+3+6+4+3+4+
Color Identity Spread
20.5% Boros
Commanders
Most Relevant
Bespoke Battlegarb 45.5% of decks
Bespoke Battlegarb 45.5% of decks
Gallant Pie-Wielder 30.9% of decks
Gallant Pie-Wielder 30.9% of decks
Return Triumphant 32.7% of decks
Return Triumphant 32.7% of decks
Imodane's Recruiter // Train Troops 25.5% of decks
Imodane's Recruiter // Train Troops 25.5% of decks
Witch's Mark 30.9% of decks
Witch's Mark 30.9% of decks
Raging Battle Mouse 30.9% of decks
Raging Battle Mouse 30.9% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (3)
- Ash, Party Crasher relevance 3.89 · 20.8% (20 of 96 decks)
- Tori D'Avenant, Fury Rider relevance 1.29 · 1.7% (4 of 240 decks)
- Livio, Oathsworn Sentinel // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.50 · 1.1% (1 of 90 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Bespoke Battlegarb relevance 3.05 · 45.5% (25 of 55 decks)
- Gallant Pie-Wielder relevance 2.06 · 30.9% (17 of 55 decks)
- Return Triumphant relevance 1.89 · 32.7% (18 of 55 decks)
- Imodane's Recruiter // Train Troops relevance 1.57 · 25.5% (14 of 55 decks)
- Witch's Mark relevance 1.56 · 30.9% (17 of 55 decks)
- Raging Battle Mouse relevance 1.35 · 30.9% (17 of 55 decks)
- Pests of Honor relevance 1.17 · 23.6% (13 of 55 decks)
- Armory Mice relevance 1.13 · 21.8% (12 of 55 decks)
- Cheeky House-Mouse // Squeak By relevance 0.81 · 18.2% (10 of 55 decks)
- Dragon Mantle relevance 0.80 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
- Monstrous Rage relevance 0.79 · 18.2% (10 of 55 decks)
- Resolute Reinforcements relevance 0.76 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.73 · 36.4% (20 of 55 decks)
- Ancestral Blade relevance 0.72 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Expel the Interlopers relevance 0.71 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Red Mage's Rapier relevance 0.70 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- White Mage's Staff relevance 0.66 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Discerning Financier relevance 0.65 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Ancestors' Aid relevance 0.61 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Hexgold Halberd relevance 0.61 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Dragoon's Lance relevance 0.60 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Charming Scoundrel relevance 0.60 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Assemble the Legion relevance 0.52 · 18.2% (10 of 55 decks)
- Raise the Alarm relevance 0.51 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Merry, Esquire of Rohan relevance 0.49 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Intangible Virtue relevance 0.47 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.44 · 20.0% (11 of 55 decks)
- Angelfire Ignition relevance 0.43 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Mentor of the Meek relevance 0.37 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Danitha Capashen, Paragon relevance 0.36 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
All creatures (12)
- Gallant Pie-Wielder relevance 2.06 · 30.9% (17 of 55 decks)
- Imodane's Recruiter // Train Troops relevance 1.57 · 25.5% (14 of 55 decks)
- Raging Battle Mouse relevance 1.35 · 30.9% (17 of 55 decks)
- Pests of Honor relevance 1.17 · 23.6% (13 of 55 decks)
- Armory Mice relevance 1.13 · 21.8% (12 of 55 decks)
- Cheeky House-Mouse // Squeak By relevance 0.81 · 18.2% (10 of 55 decks)
- Resolute Reinforcements relevance 0.76 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
- Discerning Financier relevance 0.65 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Charming Scoundrel relevance 0.60 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Merry, Esquire of Rohan relevance 0.49 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Mentor of the Meek relevance 0.37 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Danitha Capashen, Paragon relevance 0.36 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
All artifacts (6)
- Bespoke Battlegarb relevance 3.05 · 45.5% (25 of 55 decks)
- Ancestral Blade relevance 0.72 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Red Mage's Rapier relevance 0.70 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- White Mage's Staff relevance 0.66 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Hexgold Halberd relevance 0.61 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Dragoon's Lance relevance 0.60 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Dragon Mantle relevance 0.80 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
- Assemble the Legion relevance 0.52 · 18.2% (10 of 55 decks)
- Intangible Virtue relevance 0.47 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
All instants (6)
- Monstrous Rage relevance 0.79 · 18.2% (10 of 55 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.73 · 36.4% (20 of 55 decks)
- Ancestors' Aid relevance 0.61 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Raise the Alarm relevance 0.51 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.44 · 20.0% (11 of 55 decks)
- Big Score relevance 0.30 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Return Triumphant relevance 1.89 · 32.7% (18 of 55 decks)
- Witch's Mark relevance 1.56 · 30.9% (17 of 55 decks)
- Expel the Interlopers relevance 0.71 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Angelfire Ignition relevance 0.43 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Wind-Scarred Crag relevance 0.86 · 43.6% (24 of 55 decks)
- Restless Bivouac relevance 0.66 · 20.0% (11 of 55 decks)
- Secluded Steppe relevance 0.49 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
All lands (4)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.56 · 29.1% (16 of 55 decks)
- Boros Guildgate relevance 0.41 · 14.5% (8 of 55 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.41 · 20.0% (11 of 55 decks)
- Sacred Peaks relevance 0.37 · 16.4% (9 of 55 decks)
EDH data for Cut In: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 55 real decks.







































