Well of Knowledge
Played in 62 Jund decks
Color Identity Spread
4.4% Jund
-
Green 190 · 13.5%
-
Colorless 154 · 11.0%
-
Five-Color 117 · 8.3%
-
Azorius 91 · 6.5%
-
Black 91 · 6.5%
-
Blue 66 · 4.7%
-
Jund 62 · 4.4%
-
Red 60 · 4.3%
-
White 51 · 3.6%
-
Gruul 48 · 3.4%
-
Rakdos 46 · 3.3%
-
Selesnya 39 · 2.8%
-
Izzet 37 · 2.6%
-
Bant 36 · 2.6%
-
Grixis 34 · 2.4%
-
Boros 33 · 2.3%
-
Golgari 33 · 2.3%
-
Ink-Treader 32 · 2.3%
- Other (13) 185 · 13.2%
230+15+11+19+1+4+
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Bartel Runeaxe relevance 0.60 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.59 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Xantcha, Sleeper Agent relevance 1.83 · 48.4% (30 of 62 decks)
- Mana Flare relevance 1.47 · 41.9% (26 of 62 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 1.47 · 38.7% (24 of 62 decks)
- Collective Voyage relevance 1.42 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Overabundance relevance 1.41 · 38.7% (24 of 62 decks)
- Victory Chimes relevance 1.39 · 32.3% (20 of 62 decks)
- Heartbeat of Spring relevance 1.39 · 38.7% (24 of 62 decks)
- Spectral Searchlight relevance 1.38 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Feral Hydra relevance 1.31 · 19.4% (12 of 62 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.14 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 1.11 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Power Surge relevance 1.10 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Mana Cache relevance 1.10 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Magus of the Vineyard relevance 1.10 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Manabarbs relevance 1.06 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Citadel of Pain relevance 1.04 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Veteran Explorer relevance 1.02 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Ancient relevance 0.95 · 25.8% (16 of 62 decks)
- Humble Defector relevance 0.95 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
- Belbe, Corrupted Observer relevance 0.94 · 25.8% (16 of 62 decks)
- Lavaleaper relevance 0.92 · 22.6% (14 of 62 decks)
- Rootweaver Druid relevance 0.92 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.90 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Eladamri's Vineyard relevance 0.87 · 22.6% (14 of 62 decks)
- Descent into Avernus relevance 0.86 · 25.8% (16 of 62 decks)
- Horizon Stone relevance 0.79 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.79 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.77 · 19.4% (12 of 62 decks)
- Tempting Contract relevance 0.77 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Generous Plunderer relevance 0.75 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
All creatures (15)
- Xantcha, Sleeper Agent relevance 1.83 · 48.4% (30 of 62 decks)
- Feral Hydra relevance 1.31 · 19.4% (12 of 62 decks)
- Magus of the Vineyard relevance 1.10 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Veteran Explorer relevance 1.02 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Ancient relevance 0.95 · 25.8% (16 of 62 decks)
- Humble Defector relevance 0.95 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
- Belbe, Corrupted Observer relevance 0.94 · 25.8% (16 of 62 decks)
- Lavaleaper relevance 0.92 · 22.6% (14 of 62 decks)
- Rootweaver Druid relevance 0.92 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
- Generous Plunderer relevance 0.75 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
- Barbflare Gremlin relevance 0.74 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.70 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
- Jolene, the Plunder Queen relevance 0.67 · 19.4% (12 of 62 decks)
- Stoneshaker Shaman relevance 0.64 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Marching Duodrone relevance 0.64 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
All artifacts (11)
- Victory Chimes relevance 1.39 · 32.3% (20 of 62 decks)
- Spectral Searchlight relevance 1.38 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 1.11 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.90 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Horizon Stone relevance 0.79 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.79 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Tempting Contract relevance 0.77 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Sword of the Paruns relevance 0.74 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.72 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
- Bucknard's Everfull Purse relevance 0.66 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Magewright's Stone relevance 0.62 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
All enchantments (19)
- Mana Flare relevance 1.47 · 41.9% (26 of 62 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 1.47 · 38.7% (24 of 62 decks)
- Overabundance relevance 1.41 · 38.7% (24 of 62 decks)
- Heartbeat of Spring relevance 1.39 · 38.7% (24 of 62 decks)
- Power Surge relevance 1.10 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Mana Cache relevance 1.10 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Manabarbs relevance 1.06 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Citadel of Pain relevance 1.04 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Eladamri's Vineyard relevance 0.87 · 22.6% (14 of 62 decks)
- Descent into Avernus relevance 0.86 · 25.8% (16 of 62 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.77 · 19.4% (12 of 62 decks)
- Dictate of Karametra relevance 0.74 · 19.4% (12 of 62 decks)
- Instill Energy relevance 0.71 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Polluted Bonds relevance 0.71 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.68 · 24.2% (15 of 62 decks)
- Burning Earth relevance 0.68 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Exquisite Blood relevance 0.67 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- War's Toll relevance 0.67 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
- Viridian Revel relevance 0.66 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
All instants (1)
- Comet Storm relevance 0.74 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Collective Voyage relevance 1.42 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.14 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 0.68 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Hell to Pay relevance 0.65 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
EDH data for Well of Knowledge: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 62 real decks.





















































