Battlewand Oak
Played in 50 Selesnya decks
230+35+1+4+3+4+1+1+1+
Color Identity Spread
2.6% Selesnya
-
Abzan 994 · 51.8%
-
Green 736 · 38.4%
-
Golgari 61 · 3.2%
-
Selesnya 50 · 2.6%
-
Naya 49 · 2.6%
- Other (10) 28 · 1.5%
Commanders
Most Relevant
Bosk Banneret 68.0% of decks
Bosk Banneret 68.0% of decks
Orchard Warden 66.0% of decks
Orchard Warden 66.0% of decks
Dungrove Elder 60.0% of decks
Dungrove Elder 60.0% of decks
Treefolk Harbinger 62.0% of decks
Treefolk Harbinger 62.0% of decks
Fangorn, Tree Shepherd 64.0% of decks
Fangorn, Tree Shepherd 64.0% of decks
Quickbeam, Upstart Ent 56.0% of decks
Quickbeam, Upstart Ent 56.0% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Treebeard, Gracious Host relevance 2.80 · 1.9% (33 of 1,702 decks)
- Rasaad yn Bashir // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.85 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Bosk Banneret relevance 4.37 · 68.0% (34 of 50 decks)
- Orchard Warden relevance 4.27 · 66.0% (33 of 50 decks)
- Dungrove Elder relevance 4.08 · 60.0% (30 of 50 decks)
- Treefolk Harbinger relevance 3.70 · 62.0% (31 of 50 decks)
- Fangorn, Tree Shepherd relevance 3.48 · 64.0% (32 of 50 decks)
- Quickbeam, Upstart Ent relevance 3.36 · 56.0% (28 of 50 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 2.95 · 50.0% (25 of 50 decks)
- Assemble the Entmoot relevance 2.76 · 60.0% (30 of 50 decks)
- Ezzaroot Channeler relevance 2.76 · 54.0% (27 of 50 decks)
- Generous Ent relevance 2.74 · 56.0% (28 of 50 decks)
- Dormant Grove // Gnarled Grovestrider relevance 2.42 · 42.0% (21 of 50 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 2.42 · 52.0% (26 of 50 decks)
- Faeburrow Elder relevance 2.38 · 52.0% (26 of 50 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 1.98 · 32.0% (16 of 50 decks)
- Orchard Strider relevance 1.88 · 32.0% (16 of 50 decks)
- Wildwood Mentor relevance 1.86 · 32.0% (16 of 50 decks)
- Scurry Oak relevance 1.81 · 54.0% (27 of 50 decks)
- Woodfall Primus relevance 1.66 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Indomitable Ancients relevance 1.63 · 34.0% (17 of 50 decks)
- Lumberknot relevance 1.61 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
- Great Oak Guardian relevance 1.45 · 32.0% (16 of 50 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 1.44 · 38.0% (19 of 50 decks)
- Kurbis, Harvest Celebrant relevance 1.31 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Shriekwood Devourer relevance 1.30 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Tend the Sprigs relevance 1.26 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 1.26 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Many Partings relevance 1.24 · 32.0% (16 of 50 decks)
- Revive the Shire relevance 1.21 · 28.0% (14 of 50 decks)
- Heartwood Storyteller relevance 1.16 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Moonlit Lamenter relevance 1.13 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
All creatures (35)
- Bosk Banneret relevance 4.37 · 68.0% (34 of 50 decks)
- Orchard Warden relevance 4.27 · 66.0% (33 of 50 decks)
- Dungrove Elder relevance 4.08 · 60.0% (30 of 50 decks)
- Treefolk Harbinger relevance 3.70 · 62.0% (31 of 50 decks)
- Fangorn, Tree Shepherd relevance 3.48 · 64.0% (32 of 50 decks)
- Quickbeam, Upstart Ent relevance 3.36 · 56.0% (28 of 50 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 2.95 · 50.0% (25 of 50 decks)
- Ezzaroot Channeler relevance 2.76 · 54.0% (27 of 50 decks)
- Generous Ent relevance 2.74 · 56.0% (28 of 50 decks)
- Dormant Grove // Gnarled Grovestrider relevance 2.42 · 42.0% (21 of 50 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 2.42 · 52.0% (26 of 50 decks)
- Faeburrow Elder relevance 2.38 · 52.0% (26 of 50 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 1.98 · 32.0% (16 of 50 decks)
- Orchard Strider relevance 1.88 · 32.0% (16 of 50 decks)
- Wildwood Mentor relevance 1.86 · 32.0% (16 of 50 decks)
- Scurry Oak relevance 1.81 · 54.0% (27 of 50 decks)
- Woodfall Primus relevance 1.66 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Indomitable Ancients relevance 1.63 · 34.0% (17 of 50 decks)
- Lumberknot relevance 1.61 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
- Great Oak Guardian relevance 1.45 · 32.0% (16 of 50 decks)
- Kurbis, Harvest Celebrant relevance 1.31 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Shriekwood Devourer relevance 1.30 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Heartwood Storyteller relevance 1.16 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Moonlit Lamenter relevance 1.13 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- The Gaffer relevance 1.02 · 34.0% (17 of 50 decks)
- Peregrin Took relevance 0.97 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Ironroot Warlord relevance 0.97 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Ferrafor, Young Yew relevance 0.94 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Meriadoc Brandybuck relevance 0.91 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Sam, Loyal Attendant relevance 0.90 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
- Samwise Gamgee relevance 0.90 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
- Bill the Pony relevance 0.86 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Rosie Cotton of South Lane relevance 0.84 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Feasting Hobbit relevance 0.80 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Farmer Cotton relevance 0.78 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Field-Tested Frying Pan relevance 0.77 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Assemble the Entmoot relevance 2.76 · 60.0% (30 of 50 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 1.09 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
- Lignify relevance 1.09 · 28.0% (14 of 50 decks)
- Assault Formation relevance 0.76 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
All instants (3)
- Entish Restoration relevance 1.44 · 38.0% (19 of 50 decks)
- Stew the Coneys relevance 0.84 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Sheltering Word relevance 0.77 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Tend the Sprigs relevance 1.26 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 1.26 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Many Partings relevance 1.24 · 32.0% (16 of 50 decks)
- Revive the Shire relevance 1.21 · 28.0% (14 of 50 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Huatli, the Sun's Heart relevance 0.83 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- The Shire relevance 1.49 · 46.0% (23 of 50 decks)
All lands (1)
- Shire Terrace relevance 0.97 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
EDH data for Battlewand Oak: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 50 real decks.


































