Lost in the Mist
Played in 70 Azorius decks
130+2+48+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
Counterlash 45.7% of decks
Counterlash 45.7% of decks
Last Word 44.3% of decks
Last Word 44.3% of decks
Logic Knot 47.1% of decks
Logic Knot 47.1% of decks
Dismiss 50.0% of decks
Dismiss 50.0% of decks
Forceful Denial 45.7% of decks
Forceful Denial 45.7% of decks
Devious Cover-Up 47.1% of decks
Devious Cover-Up 47.1% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Dorothea, Vengeful Victim // Dorothea's Retribution relevance 0.78 · 1.7% (2 of 120 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Counterlash relevance 3.11 · 45.7% (32 of 70 decks)
- Last Word relevance 3.06 · 44.3% (31 of 70 decks)
- Logic Knot relevance 3.02 · 47.1% (33 of 70 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 3.01 · 50.0% (35 of 70 decks)
- Forceful Denial relevance 2.94 · 45.7% (32 of 70 decks)
- Devious Cover-Up relevance 2.93 · 47.1% (33 of 70 decks)
- Countermand relevance 2.88 · 44.3% (31 of 70 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 2.86 · 41.4% (29 of 70 decks)
- Contradict relevance 2.84 · 42.9% (30 of 70 decks)
- Memory Drain relevance 2.81 · 44.3% (31 of 70 decks)
- Desertion relevance 2.79 · 48.6% (34 of 70 decks)
- Minor Misstep relevance 2.74 · 41.4% (29 of 70 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 2.71 · 42.9% (30 of 70 decks)
- Fall of the Gavel relevance 2.70 · 42.9% (30 of 70 decks)
- Hinder relevance 2.66 · 41.4% (29 of 70 decks)
- Grip of Amnesia relevance 2.65 · 38.6% (27 of 70 decks)
- Dissipate relevance 2.58 · 50.0% (35 of 70 decks)
- Overwhelming Denial relevance 2.58 · 38.6% (27 of 70 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 2.55 · 37.1% (26 of 70 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 2.54 · 41.4% (29 of 70 decks)
- Intervene relevance 2.52 · 37.1% (26 of 70 decks)
- Brush Off relevance 2.50 · 44.3% (31 of 70 decks)
- Disappearing Act relevance 2.50 · 37.1% (26 of 70 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 2.49 · 41.4% (29 of 70 decks)
- Assert Authority relevance 2.47 · 42.9% (30 of 70 decks)
- Abstruse Interference relevance 2.47 · 38.6% (27 of 70 decks)
- Lose Focus relevance 2.46 · 44.3% (31 of 70 decks)
- Insidious Will relevance 2.45 · 41.4% (29 of 70 decks)
- Out of Air relevance 2.45 · 35.7% (25 of 70 decks)
- Confirm Suspicions relevance 2.45 · 42.9% (30 of 70 decks)
All creatures (2)
- Disruptive Pitmage relevance 2.33 · 34.3% (24 of 70 decks)
- Disruptive Student relevance 2.29 · 34.3% (24 of 70 decks)
All instants (48)
- Counterlash relevance 3.11 · 45.7% (32 of 70 decks)
- Last Word relevance 3.06 · 44.3% (31 of 70 decks)
- Logic Knot relevance 3.02 · 47.1% (33 of 70 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 3.01 · 50.0% (35 of 70 decks)
- Forceful Denial relevance 2.94 · 45.7% (32 of 70 decks)
- Devious Cover-Up relevance 2.93 · 47.1% (33 of 70 decks)
- Countermand relevance 2.88 · 44.3% (31 of 70 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 2.86 · 41.4% (29 of 70 decks)
- Contradict relevance 2.84 · 42.9% (30 of 70 decks)
- Memory Drain relevance 2.81 · 44.3% (31 of 70 decks)
- Desertion relevance 2.79 · 48.6% (34 of 70 decks)
- Minor Misstep relevance 2.74 · 41.4% (29 of 70 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 2.71 · 42.9% (30 of 70 decks)
- Fall of the Gavel relevance 2.70 · 42.9% (30 of 70 decks)
- Hinder relevance 2.66 · 41.4% (29 of 70 decks)
- Grip of Amnesia relevance 2.65 · 38.6% (27 of 70 decks)
- Dissipate relevance 2.58 · 50.0% (35 of 70 decks)
- Overwhelming Denial relevance 2.58 · 38.6% (27 of 70 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 2.55 · 37.1% (26 of 70 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 2.54 · 41.4% (29 of 70 decks)
- Intervene relevance 2.52 · 37.1% (26 of 70 decks)
- Brush Off relevance 2.50 · 44.3% (31 of 70 decks)
- Disappearing Act relevance 2.50 · 37.1% (26 of 70 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 2.49 · 41.4% (29 of 70 decks)
- Assert Authority relevance 2.47 · 42.9% (30 of 70 decks)
- Abstruse Interference relevance 2.47 · 38.6% (27 of 70 decks)
- Lose Focus relevance 2.46 · 44.3% (31 of 70 decks)
- Insidious Will relevance 2.45 · 41.4% (29 of 70 decks)
- Out of Air relevance 2.45 · 35.7% (25 of 70 decks)
- Confirm Suspicions relevance 2.45 · 42.9% (30 of 70 decks)
- Convolute relevance 2.44 · 42.9% (30 of 70 decks)
- Complicate relevance 2.44 · 37.1% (26 of 70 decks)
- Fuel for the Cause relevance 2.43 · 41.4% (29 of 70 decks)
- Deny Existence relevance 2.43 · 35.7% (25 of 70 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 2.43 · 42.9% (30 of 70 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 2.40 · 40.0% (28 of 70 decks)
- Flash Counter relevance 2.40 · 35.7% (25 of 70 decks)
- Deprive relevance 2.35 · 40.0% (28 of 70 decks)
- Familiar's Ruse relevance 2.35 · 40.0% (28 of 70 decks)
- Dispelling Exhale relevance 2.35 · 34.3% (24 of 70 decks)
- Hydroblast relevance 2.34 · 35.7% (25 of 70 decks)
- Admiral's Order relevance 2.31 · 38.6% (27 of 70 decks)
- Ertai's Scorn relevance 2.30 · 40.0% (28 of 70 decks)
- Neutralize relevance 2.28 · 40.0% (28 of 70 decks)
- Lapse of Certainty relevance 2.28 · 37.1% (26 of 70 decks)
- Spell Crumple relevance 2.27 · 34.3% (24 of 70 decks)
- Make Disappear relevance 2.25 · 35.7% (25 of 70 decks)
- Quench relevance 2.25 · 37.1% (26 of 70 decks)
EDH data for Lost in the Mist: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 70 real decks.



















