Ancestral Vision
Played in 6,503 Grixis decks
1130+19+10+15+1+5+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Obeka, Splitter of Seconds 35.4% of decks
Obeka, Splitter of Seconds 35.4% of decks
Abaddon the Despoiler 42.9% of decks
Abaddon the Despoiler 42.9% of decks
Tetsuo, Imperial Champion 55.4% of decks
Tetsuo, Imperial Champion 55.4% of decks
The Tenth Doctor // Vislor Turlough 38.5% of decks
The Tenth Doctor // Vislor Turlough 38.5% of decks
The Twelfth Doctor // Vislor Turlough 6.2% of decks
The Twelfth Doctor // Vislor Turlough 6.2% of decks
The Ninth Doctor // Vislor Turlough 30.0% of decks
The Ninth Doctor // Vislor Turlough 30.0% of decks
Most Relevant
Profane Tutor 62.4% of decks
Profane Tutor 62.4% of decks
Inevitable Betrayal 49.3% of decks
Inevitable Betrayal 49.3% of decks
Creeping Bloodsucker 49.1% of decks
Creeping Bloodsucker 49.1% of decks
Twilight Prophet 50.7% of decks
Twilight Prophet 50.7% of decks
As Foretold 44.9% of decks
As Foretold 44.9% of decks
Court of Ambition 46.0% of decks
Court of Ambition 46.0% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (11)
- Obeka, Splitter of Seconds relevance 4.34 · 35.4% (3,176 of 8,977 decks)
- Abaddon the Despoiler relevance 4.33 · 42.9% (1,909 of 4,452 decks)
- Tetsuo, Imperial Champion relevance 4.17 · 55.4% (839 of 1,515 decks)
- The Tenth Doctor // Vislor Turlough relevance 0.99 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- The Twelfth Doctor // Vislor Turlough relevance 0.78 · 6.2% (20 of 323 decks)
- The Ninth Doctor // Vislor Turlough relevance 0.71 · 30.0% (3 of 10 decks)
- Jeleva, Nephalia's Scourge relevance 0.44 · 2.0% (33 of 1,620 decks)
- Cecily, Haunted Mage relevance 0.35 · 2.5% (10 of 402 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Kraum, Ludevic's Opus relevance 0.31 · 7.4% (2 of 27 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Keskit, the Flesh Sculptor relevance 0.22 · 9.1% (1 of 11 decks)
- Nicol Bolas relevance 0.16 · 1.1% (8 of 761 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Profane Tutor relevance 2.18 · 62.4% (4,061 of 6,503 decks)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 1.93 · 49.3% (3,209 of 6,503 decks)
- Creeping Bloodsucker relevance 1.79 · 49.1% (3,192 of 6,503 decks)
- Twilight Prophet relevance 1.77 · 50.7% (3,298 of 6,503 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 1.58 · 44.9% (2,919 of 6,503 decks)
- Court of Ambition relevance 1.54 · 46.0% (2,990 of 6,503 decks)
- Court of Ire relevance 1.49 · 40.1% (2,607 of 6,503 decks)
- Inspiring Refrain relevance 1.49 · 36.3% (2,359 of 6,503 decks)
- Dragonmaster Outcast relevance 1.48 · 39.7% (2,580 of 6,503 decks)
- Ring of Valkas relevance 1.47 · 37.9% (2,463 of 6,503 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 1.44 · 38.4% (2,500 of 6,503 decks)
- Jhoira of the Ghitu relevance 1.40 · 33.2% (2,162 of 6,503 decks)
- Ring of Evos Isle relevance 1.38 · 35.2% (2,286 of 6,503 decks)
- Rousing Refrain relevance 1.35 · 33.3% (2,164 of 6,503 decks)
- Suspended Sentence relevance 1.34 · 32.0% (2,078 of 6,503 decks)
- Sol Talisman relevance 1.34 · 30.4% (1,975 of 6,503 decks)
- Court of Embereth relevance 1.33 · 34.2% (2,221 of 6,503 decks)
- Ring of Xathrid relevance 1.32 · 32.9% (2,137 of 6,503 decks)
- Court of Vantress relevance 1.27 · 33.8% (2,196 of 6,503 decks)
- Lizard Blades relevance 1.23 · 29.3% (1,908 of 6,503 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 1.19 · 33.8% (2,196 of 6,503 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 1.18 · 36.5% (2,373 of 6,503 decks)
- Skyline Despot relevance 1.18 · 27.7% (1,800 of 6,503 decks)
- Descent into Avernus relevance 1.16 · 31.1% (2,021 of 6,503 decks)
- Court of Locthwain relevance 1.12 · 30.4% (1,980 of 6,503 decks)
- Palace Siege relevance 1.11 · 25.8% (1,676 of 6,503 decks)
- Plargg and Nassari relevance 1.10 · 32.6% (2,123 of 6,503 decks)
- Thassa, God of the Sea relevance 1.07 · 25.8% (1,676 of 6,503 decks)
- Indulgent Tormentor relevance 1.06 · 27.3% (1,776 of 6,503 decks)
- Wheel of Fate relevance 1.04 · 27.4% (1,783 of 6,503 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Creeping Bloodsucker relevance 1.79 · 49.1% (3,192 of 6,503 decks)
- Twilight Prophet relevance 1.77 · 50.7% (3,298 of 6,503 decks)
- Dragonmaster Outcast relevance 1.48 · 39.7% (2,580 of 6,503 decks)
- Jhoira of the Ghitu relevance 1.40 · 33.2% (2,162 of 6,503 decks)
- Lizard Blades relevance 1.23 · 29.3% (1,908 of 6,503 decks)
- Skyline Despot relevance 1.18 · 27.7% (1,800 of 6,503 decks)
- Plargg and Nassari relevance 1.10 · 32.6% (2,123 of 6,503 decks)
- Thassa, God of the Sea relevance 1.07 · 25.8% (1,676 of 6,503 decks)
- Indulgent Tormentor relevance 1.06 · 27.3% (1,776 of 6,503 decks)
- Silent Arbiter relevance 0.96 · 25.3% (1,648 of 6,503 decks)
- Braids, Conjurer Adept relevance 0.90 · 20.2% (1,314 of 6,503 decks)
- Loyal Subordinate relevance 0.89 · 20.8% (1,355 of 6,503 decks)
- Stormfist Crusader relevance 0.88 · 27.5% (1,787 of 6,503 decks)
- Bonehoard Dracosaur relevance 0.84 · 18.5% (1,203 of 6,503 decks)
- Neheb, the Eternal relevance 0.84 · 19.0% (1,236 of 6,503 decks)
- Star Whale relevance 0.81 · 16.1% (1,046 of 6,503 decks)
- Generous Plunderer relevance 0.80 · 19.3% (1,252 of 6,503 decks)
- Keeper of Secrets relevance 0.78 · 19.6% (1,276 of 6,503 decks)
- Thermo-Alchemist relevance 0.75 · 15.9% (1,035 of 6,503 decks)
All artifacts (10)
- Ring of Valkas relevance 1.47 · 37.9% (2,463 of 6,503 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 1.44 · 38.4% (2,500 of 6,503 decks)
- Ring of Evos Isle relevance 1.38 · 35.2% (2,286 of 6,503 decks)
- Sol Talisman relevance 1.34 · 30.4% (1,975 of 6,503 decks)
- Ring of Xathrid relevance 1.32 · 32.9% (2,137 of 6,503 decks)
- Mox Tantalite relevance 0.89 · 18.1% (1,177 of 6,503 decks)
- Winged Boots relevance 0.85 · 22.9% (1,491 of 6,503 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.85 · 27.0% (1,753 of 6,503 decks)
- Darksteel Reactor relevance 0.75 · 15.8% (1,030 of 6,503 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.74 · 22.7% (1,476 of 6,503 decks)
All enchantments (15)
- As Foretold relevance 1.58 · 44.9% (2,919 of 6,503 decks)
- Court of Ambition relevance 1.54 · 46.0% (2,990 of 6,503 decks)
- Court of Ire relevance 1.49 · 40.1% (2,607 of 6,503 decks)
- Court of Embereth relevance 1.33 · 34.2% (2,221 of 6,503 decks)
- Court of Vantress relevance 1.27 · 33.8% (2,196 of 6,503 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 1.19 · 33.8% (2,196 of 6,503 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 1.18 · 36.5% (2,373 of 6,503 decks)
- Descent into Avernus relevance 1.16 · 31.1% (2,021 of 6,503 decks)
- Court of Locthwain relevance 1.12 · 30.4% (1,980 of 6,503 decks)
- Palace Siege relevance 1.11 · 25.8% (1,676 of 6,503 decks)
- Paradox Haze relevance 1.00 · 25.5% (1,660 of 6,503 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.98 · 30.7% (1,994 of 6,503 decks)
- Court of Cunning relevance 0.94 · 22.4% (1,457 of 6,503 decks)
- Aether Tunnel relevance 0.87 · 20.1% (1,309 of 6,503 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.80 · 29.7% (1,934 of 6,503 decks)
All instants (1)
- Suspended Sentence relevance 1.34 · 32.0% (2,078 of 6,503 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Profane Tutor relevance 2.18 · 62.4% (4,061 of 6,503 decks)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 1.93 · 49.3% (3,209 of 6,503 decks)
- Inspiring Refrain relevance 1.49 · 36.3% (2,359 of 6,503 decks)
- Rousing Refrain relevance 1.35 · 33.3% (2,164 of 6,503 decks)
- Wheel of Fate relevance 1.04 · 27.4% (1,783 of 6,503 decks)
EDH data for Ancestral Vision: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 6,503 real decks.




















































