Condescend
Played in 1,465 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
8.8% Blue
3030+14+1+2+21+6+1+5+
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Siani, Eye of the Storm relevance 3.75 · 33.7% (211 of 626 decks)
- Matoya, Archon Elder relevance 3.42 · 26.7% (180 of 673 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 2.44 · 31.2% (34 of 109 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 1.98 · 5.5% (177 of 3,198 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 1.93 · 15.3% (31 of 202 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 1.45 · 3.4% (117 of 3,468 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur relevance 1.27 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Proft, Consulting Detective relevance 1.26 · 25.0% (6 of 24 decks)
- Memnarch relevance 0.84 · 2.3% (29 of 1,264 decks)
- Ertai, Wizard Adept relevance 0.84 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Grandmother Goby relevance 0.78 · 3.1% (14 of 458 decks)
- Eluge, the Shoreless Sea relevance 0.75 · 1.2% (92 of 7,741 decks)
- Elrond, Lord of Rivendell relevance 0.65 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Gustha Ebbasdotter relevance 0.61 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Deekah, Fractal Theorist relevance 0.56 · 3.6% (5 of 139 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.56 · 2.6% (7 of 266 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.52 · 3.8% (4 of 105 decks)
- Imoen, Mystic Trickster // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.48 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // The Prismatic Piper relevance 0.48 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 0.48 · 1.3% (13 of 965 decks)
- Doc Ock, Sinister Scientist relevance 0.43 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Richard Garfield, Ph.D. relevance 0.43 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.42 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Jacob Hauken, Inspector // Hauken's Insight relevance 0.42 · 1.4% (9 of 659 decks)
- Fblthp, the Lost relevance 0.38 · 1.6% (6 of 384 decks)
- Meneldor, Swift Savior relevance 0.37 · 4.3% (2 of 47 decks)
- Arcanis the Omnipotent relevance 0.36 · 1.0% (10 of 960 decks)
- Empress Galina relevance 0.35 · 1.3% (6 of 445 decks)
- Alhammarret, High Arbiter relevance 0.33 · 10.0% (1 of 10 decks)
- Atemsis, All-Seeing relevance 0.33 · 1.0% (8 of 767 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Dissolve relevance 1.25 · 31.6% (463 of 1,465 decks)
- Cryptic Annelid relevance 1.01 · 18.2% (267 of 1,465 decks)
- Mystic Speculation relevance 0.99 · 19.5% (285 of 1,465 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.99 · 24.8% (364 of 1,465 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.95 · 36.5% (534 of 1,465 decks)
- Augury Owl relevance 0.84 · 16.9% (248 of 1,465 decks)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 0.84 · 23.7% (347 of 1,465 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 0.77 · 14.0% (205 of 1,465 decks)
- Sphinx of Foresight relevance 0.75 · 16.2% (238 of 1,465 decks)
- Sigiled Starfish relevance 0.73 · 14.1% (206 of 1,465 decks)
- Scour All Possibilities relevance 0.71 · 14.5% (212 of 1,465 decks)
- Faerie Seer relevance 0.70 · 20.8% (305 of 1,465 decks)
- Foresee relevance 0.69 · 13.0% (190 of 1,465 decks)
- Prognostic Sphinx relevance 0.68 · 13.7% (201 of 1,465 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 0.67 · 16.3% (239 of 1,465 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.66 · 44.0% (644 of 1,465 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.66 · 22.7% (332 of 1,465 decks)
- Crystal Ball relevance 0.66 · 11.7% (171 of 1,465 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.65 · 42.0% (616 of 1,465 decks)
- Syncopate relevance 0.64 · 15.0% (220 of 1,465 decks)
- Thassa, God of the Sea relevance 0.64 · 17.9% (262 of 1,465 decks)
- Sinister Sabotage relevance 0.63 · 13.5% (198 of 1,465 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 0.62 · 11.4% (167 of 1,465 decks)
- Tamiyo's Epiphany relevance 0.62 · 11.1% (162 of 1,465 decks)
- Behold the Multiverse relevance 0.59 · 15.1% (221 of 1,465 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 0.59 · 14.0% (205 of 1,465 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.57 · 18.4% (270 of 1,465 decks)
- Annul relevance 0.56 · 15.3% (224 of 1,465 decks)
- Memory Drain relevance 0.55 · 9.6% (140 of 1,465 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.55 · 25.2% (369 of 1,465 decks)
All creatures (14)
- Cryptic Annelid relevance 1.01 · 18.2% (267 of 1,465 decks)
- Augury Owl relevance 0.84 · 16.9% (248 of 1,465 decks)
- Sphinx of Foresight relevance 0.75 · 16.2% (238 of 1,465 decks)
- Sigiled Starfish relevance 0.73 · 14.1% (206 of 1,465 decks)
- Faerie Seer relevance 0.70 · 20.8% (305 of 1,465 decks)
- Prognostic Sphinx relevance 0.68 · 13.7% (201 of 1,465 decks)
- Thassa, God of the Sea relevance 0.64 · 17.9% (262 of 1,465 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.55 · 25.2% (369 of 1,465 decks)
- Elvish Mariner relevance 0.54 · 9.4% (138 of 1,465 decks)
- Warden of Evos Isle relevance 0.53 · 12.7% (186 of 1,465 decks)
- Triskaidekaphile relevance 0.53 · 22.2% (325 of 1,465 decks)
- Hermes, Overseer of Elpis relevance 0.51 · 13.8% (202 of 1,465 decks)
- Silver Raven relevance 0.51 · 12.1% (177 of 1,465 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.50 · 30.8% (451 of 1,465 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Crystal Ball relevance 0.66 · 11.7% (171 of 1,465 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 0.84 · 23.7% (347 of 1,465 decks)
- Omen of the Sea relevance 0.47 · 9.2% (135 of 1,465 decks)
All instants (21)
- Dissolve relevance 1.25 · 31.6% (463 of 1,465 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.99 · 24.8% (364 of 1,465 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 0.77 · 14.0% (205 of 1,465 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 0.67 · 16.3% (239 of 1,465 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.66 · 44.0% (644 of 1,465 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.66 · 22.7% (332 of 1,465 decks)
- Syncopate relevance 0.64 · 15.0% (220 of 1,465 decks)
- Sinister Sabotage relevance 0.63 · 13.5% (198 of 1,465 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 0.62 · 11.4% (167 of 1,465 decks)
- Behold the Multiverse relevance 0.59 · 15.1% (221 of 1,465 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 0.59 · 14.0% (205 of 1,465 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.57 · 18.4% (270 of 1,465 decks)
- Annul relevance 0.56 · 15.3% (224 of 1,465 decks)
- Memory Drain relevance 0.55 · 9.6% (140 of 1,465 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.52 · 21.8% (319 of 1,465 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.51 · 15.6% (229 of 1,465 decks)
- Voyage's End relevance 0.50 · 9.1% (134 of 1,465 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.50 · 22.5% (330 of 1,465 decks)
- Select for Inspection relevance 0.49 · 8.3% (121 of 1,465 decks)
- Exclude relevance 0.48 · 11.2% (164 of 1,465 decks)
- Saw It Coming relevance 0.47 · 12.3% (180 of 1,465 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Mystic Speculation relevance 0.99 · 19.5% (285 of 1,465 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.95 · 36.5% (534 of 1,465 decks)
- Scour All Possibilities relevance 0.71 · 14.5% (212 of 1,465 decks)
- Foresee relevance 0.69 · 13.0% (190 of 1,465 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.65 · 42.0% (616 of 1,465 decks)
- Tamiyo's Epiphany relevance 0.62 · 11.1% (162 of 1,465 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Jace, Mirror Mage relevance 0.51 · 11.5% (168 of 1,465 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Zhalfirin Void relevance 0.81 · 17.5% (256 of 1,465 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.73 · 15.5% (227 of 1,465 decks)
- The Grey Havens relevance 0.72 · 14.1% (207 of 1,465 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.62 · 24.9% (365 of 1,465 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.61 · 31.2% (457 of 1,465 decks)
EDH data for Condescend: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,465 real decks.















































































