Chronosavant
Played in 113 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
113 decks
Commanders
6
Commanders
6Showing 1-6 of 6
Page size
All commanders (6)
- Noble Heritage // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 1.50 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- The Sixth Doctor // Jo Grant relevance 1.04 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Rashka the Slayer relevance 1.02 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Stet, Draconic Proofreader relevance 1.00 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.91 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Noble Heritage // Faceless One relevance 0.89 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
Parallel Cards
6
Parallel Cards
Showing 1-6 of 6
Page size
All parallel cards (6)
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30Showing 1-10 of 30
Page size
All most relevant (30)
- Chronatog relevance 3.96 · 45.1% (51 of 113 decks)
- Chronatog Totem relevance 3.73 · 42.5% (48 of 113 decks)
- Chronomantic Escape relevance 2.94 · 40.7% (46 of 113 decks)
- Capashen Templar relevance 2.88 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Castle Raptors relevance 2.83 · 25.7% (29 of 113 decks)
- Caravan Hurda relevance 2.82 · 27.4% (31 of 113 decks)
- Battle Hurda relevance 2.79 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Calciderm relevance 2.71 · 25.7% (29 of 113 decks)
- Callous Deceiver relevance 2.60 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Benalish Heralds relevance 2.57 · 23.0% (26 of 113 decks)
- Checkpoint Officer relevance 2.56 · 26.5% (30 of 113 decks)
- Cho-Arrim Bruiser relevance 2.55 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Candles of Leng relevance 2.55 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Chasm Drake relevance 2.54 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Blizzard Elemental relevance 2.53 · 23.0% (26 of 113 decks)
- Charmed Griffin relevance 2.53 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Cavalry Master relevance 2.53 · 25.7% (29 of 113 decks)
- Cephalid Snitch relevance 2.53 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Celestus Sanctifier relevance 2.53 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Circle of Solace relevance 2.52 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Caprichrome relevance 2.52 · 25.7% (29 of 113 decks)
- Chronostutter relevance 2.52 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Battlewise Aven relevance 2.51 · 23.0% (26 of 113 decks)
- Charm Peddler relevance 2.51 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Celestial Messenger relevance 2.50 · 23.0% (26 of 113 decks)
- Cloudreach Cavalry relevance 2.50 · 23.0% (26 of 113 decks)
- Cache Raiders relevance 2.50 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Chapel Geist relevance 2.50 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Cerulean Wyvern relevance 2.50 · 23.0% (26 of 113 decks)
- Caregiver relevance 2.49 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
Creatures
42
Creatures
42 Showing 1-10 of 42
Page size
All creatures (42)
- Chronatog relevance 3.96 · 45.1% (51 of 113 decks)
- Capashen Templar relevance 2.88 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Castle Raptors relevance 2.83 · 25.7% (29 of 113 decks)
- Caravan Hurda relevance 2.82 · 27.4% (31 of 113 decks)
- Battle Hurda relevance 2.79 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Calciderm relevance 2.71 · 25.7% (29 of 113 decks)
- Callous Deceiver relevance 2.60 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Benalish Heralds relevance 2.57 · 23.0% (26 of 113 decks)
- Checkpoint Officer relevance 2.56 · 26.5% (30 of 113 decks)
- Cho-Arrim Bruiser relevance 2.55 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Chasm Drake relevance 2.54 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Blizzard Elemental relevance 2.53 · 23.0% (26 of 113 decks)
- Charmed Griffin relevance 2.53 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Cavalry Master relevance 2.53 · 25.7% (29 of 113 decks)
- Cephalid Snitch relevance 2.53 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Celestus Sanctifier relevance 2.53 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Caprichrome relevance 2.52 · 25.7% (29 of 113 decks)
- Battlewise Aven relevance 2.51 · 23.0% (26 of 113 decks)
- Charm Peddler relevance 2.51 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Celestial Messenger relevance 2.50 · 23.0% (26 of 113 decks)
- Cloudreach Cavalry relevance 2.50 · 23.0% (26 of 113 decks)
- Cache Raiders relevance 2.50 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Chapel Geist relevance 2.50 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Cerulean Wyvern relevance 2.50 · 23.0% (26 of 113 decks)
- Caregiver relevance 2.49 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Charismatic Vanguard relevance 2.49 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Champion Lancer relevance 2.49 · 23.0% (26 of 113 decks)
- Cantivore relevance 2.49 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Cephalid Aristocrat relevance 2.49 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Benalish Missionary relevance 2.48 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Charging Paladin relevance 2.48 · 23.0% (26 of 113 decks)
- Aven Soulgazer relevance 2.48 · 22.1% (25 of 113 decks)
- Coastal Hornclaw relevance 2.48 · 22.1% (25 of 113 decks)
- Crowd Favorites relevance 2.47 · 21.2% (24 of 113 decks)
- Champion of Arashin relevance 2.46 · 25.7% (29 of 113 decks)
- Carrier Pigeons relevance 2.46 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Calming Licid relevance 2.46 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Border Patrol relevance 2.46 · 23.0% (26 of 113 decks)
- Benalish Veteran relevance 2.45 · 22.1% (25 of 113 decks)
- Capashen Knight relevance 2.45 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Battalion Foot Soldier relevance 2.45 · 22.1% (25 of 113 decks)
- Cho-Arrim Alchemist relevance 2.45 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
Artifacts
2
Artifacts
2 All artifacts (2)
- Chronatog Totem relevance 3.73 · 42.5% (48 of 113 decks)
- Candles of Leng relevance 2.55 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
Enchantments
3
Enchantments
3 Showing 1-3 of 3
Page size
All enchantments (3)
- Circle of Solace relevance 2.52 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Cephalid Shrine relevance 2.48 · 23.0% (26 of 113 decks)
- Cagemail relevance 2.47 · 23.0% (26 of 113 decks)
Instants
2
Instants
2 
All instants (2)
- Chronostutter relevance 2.52 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Chain of Silence relevance 2.47 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
Sorceries
1
Sorceries
1 Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
All sorceries (1)
- Chronomantic Escape relevance 2.94 · 40.7% (46 of 113 decks)
EDH data for Chronosavant: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 113 real decks.