Capashen Templar

Played in 53 decks

Capashen Templar
$0.08 €0.10

Change per day

Commanders

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
All commanders (5)
  1. Torsten Von Ursus relevance 1.03 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
  2. Sidar Jabari relevance 1.01 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
  3. Livio, Oathsworn Sentinel // Keleth, Sunmane Familiar relevance 0.98 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
  4. Ignacio of Myra's Marvels // Katerina of Myra's Marvels relevance 0.98 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
  5. Gerrard Capashen relevance 0.83 · 1.8% (1 of 57 decks)

Parallel Cards

30

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Capashen Knight
    6.90 69.8%
    $0.12 €0.12
  • Charging Paladin
    6.73 62.3%
    $0.06 €0.05
  • Benalish Veteran
    6.68 60.4%
    $0.05 €0.04
  • Calciderm
    6.58 62.3%
    $0.13 €0.05
  • Capashen Standard
    6.55 67.9%
    $0.18 €0.03
  • Benalish Heralds
    6.54 58.5%
    $0.25 €0.12
  • Castle Raptors
    6.44 58.5%
    $0.08 €0.04
  • Champion Lancer
    6.35 58.5%
    $3.65 €3.63
  • Battalion Foot Soldier
    6.27 56.6%
    $0.04 €0.07
  • Call to Arms
    6.25 60.4%
    $0.71 €0.81
All most relevant (30)
  1. Capashen Knight relevance 6.90 · 69.8% (37 of 53 decks)
  2. Charging Paladin relevance 6.73 · 62.3% (33 of 53 decks)
  3. Benalish Veteran relevance 6.68 · 60.4% (32 of 53 decks)
  4. Calciderm relevance 6.58 · 62.3% (33 of 53 decks)
  5. Capashen Standard relevance 6.55 · 67.9% (36 of 53 decks)
  6. Benalish Heralds relevance 6.54 · 58.5% (31 of 53 decks)
  7. Castle Raptors relevance 6.44 · 58.5% (31 of 53 decks)
  8. Champion Lancer relevance 6.35 · 58.5% (31 of 53 decks)
  9. Battalion Foot Soldier relevance 6.27 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  10. Call to Arms relevance 6.25 · 60.4% (32 of 53 decks)
  11. Blizzard Elemental relevance 6.24 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  12. Battle Hurda relevance 6.16 · 54.7% (29 of 53 decks)
  13. Callous Deceiver relevance 6.16 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  14. Cho-Arrim Legate relevance 6.11 · 60.4% (32 of 53 decks)
  15. Cephalid Shrine relevance 6.10 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  16. Aven Flock relevance 6.10 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  17. Cagemail relevance 6.08 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  18. Benalish Lancer relevance 6.07 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  19. Burrenton Shield-Bearers relevance 6.01 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  20. Bold Defense relevance 6.00 · 54.7% (29 of 53 decks)
  21. Cephalid Snitch relevance 5.99 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  22. Celestus Sanctifier relevance 5.98 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  23. Battlewise Aven relevance 5.97 · 54.7% (29 of 53 decks)
  24. Charm Peddler relevance 5.93 · 58.5% (31 of 53 decks)
  25. Chapel Geist relevance 5.92 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  26. Bubbling Beebles relevance 5.91 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  27. Cantivore relevance 5.90 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  28. Caregiver relevance 5.89 · 58.5% (31 of 53 decks)
  29. Chieftain en-Dal relevance 5.88 · 60.4% (32 of 53 decks)
  30. Border Guard relevance 5.86 · 54.7% (29 of 53 decks)

Creatures

43

Showing 1-10 of 43

Page size
  • Capashen Knight
    6.90 69.8%
    $0.12 €0.12
  • Charging Paladin
    6.73 62.3%
    $0.06 €0.05
  • Benalish Veteran
    6.68 60.4%
    $0.05 €0.04
  • Calciderm
    6.58 62.3%
    $0.13 €0.05
  • Benalish Heralds
    6.54 58.5%
    $0.25 €0.12
  • Castle Raptors
    6.44 58.5%
    $0.08 €0.04
  • Champion Lancer
    6.35 58.5%
    $3.65 €3.63
  • Battalion Foot Soldier
    6.27 56.6%
    $0.04 €0.07
  • Blizzard Elemental
    6.24 56.6%
    $0.49 €0.32
  • Battle Hurda
    6.16 54.7%
    $0.04 €0.03
All creatures (43)
  1. Capashen Knight relevance 6.90 · 69.8% (37 of 53 decks)
  2. Charging Paladin relevance 6.73 · 62.3% (33 of 53 decks)
  3. Benalish Veteran relevance 6.68 · 60.4% (32 of 53 decks)
  4. Calciderm relevance 6.58 · 62.3% (33 of 53 decks)
  5. Benalish Heralds relevance 6.54 · 58.5% (31 of 53 decks)
  6. Castle Raptors relevance 6.44 · 58.5% (31 of 53 decks)
  7. Champion Lancer relevance 6.35 · 58.5% (31 of 53 decks)
  8. Battalion Foot Soldier relevance 6.27 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  9. Blizzard Elemental relevance 6.24 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  10. Battle Hurda relevance 6.16 · 54.7% (29 of 53 decks)
  11. Callous Deceiver relevance 6.16 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  12. Cho-Arrim Legate relevance 6.11 · 60.4% (32 of 53 decks)
  13. Aven Flock relevance 6.10 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  14. Benalish Lancer relevance 6.07 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  15. Burrenton Shield-Bearers relevance 6.01 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  16. Cephalid Snitch relevance 5.99 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  17. Celestus Sanctifier relevance 5.98 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  18. Battlewise Aven relevance 5.97 · 54.7% (29 of 53 decks)
  19. Charm Peddler relevance 5.93 · 58.5% (31 of 53 decks)
  20. Chapel Geist relevance 5.92 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  21. Bubbling Beebles relevance 5.91 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  22. Cantivore relevance 5.90 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  23. Caregiver relevance 5.89 · 58.5% (31 of 53 decks)
  24. Chieftain en-Dal relevance 5.88 · 60.4% (32 of 53 decks)
  25. Border Guard relevance 5.86 · 54.7% (29 of 53 decks)
  26. Benalish Missionary relevance 5.86 · 58.5% (31 of 53 decks)
  27. Border Patrol relevance 5.85 · 54.7% (29 of 53 decks)
  28. Alaborn Veteran relevance 5.84 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  29. Caravan Hurda relevance 5.83 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  30. Cho-Arrim Bruiser relevance 5.82 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  31. Calming Licid relevance 5.82 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  32. Chasm Drake relevance 5.82 · 54.7% (29 of 53 decks)
  33. Celestial Enforcer relevance 5.80 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  34. Aven Trooper relevance 5.79 · 52.8% (28 of 53 decks)
  35. Charmed Griffin relevance 5.79 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  36. Cavalry Master relevance 5.77 · 58.5% (31 of 53 decks)
  37. Battleflight Eagle relevance 5.76 · 54.7% (29 of 53 decks)
  38. Benalish Faithbonder relevance 5.76 · 58.5% (31 of 53 decks)
  39. Champion's Drake relevance 5.76 · 54.7% (29 of 53 decks)
  40. Breezekeeper relevance 5.76 · 52.8% (28 of 53 decks)
  41. Celestial Messenger relevance 5.75 · 52.8% (28 of 53 decks)
  42. Caprichrome relevance 5.74 · 58.5% (31 of 53 decks)
  43. Chronosavant relevance 5.74 · 52.8% (28 of 53 decks)

Enchantments

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Capashen Standard
    6.55 67.9%
    $0.18 €0.03
  • Call to Arms
    6.25 60.4%
    $0.71 €0.81
  • Cephalid Shrine
    6.10 56.6%
    $0.35 €0.29
  • Cagemail
    6.08 56.6%
    $0.21 €0.06
All enchantments (4)
  1. Capashen Standard relevance 6.55 · 67.9% (36 of 53 decks)
  2. Call to Arms relevance 6.25 · 60.4% (32 of 53 decks)
  3. Cephalid Shrine relevance 6.10 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  4. Cagemail relevance 6.08 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)

Instants

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Bold Defense
    6.00 54.7%
    $0.11 €0.06
  • Chain of Silence
    5.85 56.6%
    $0.25 €0.03
  • Candles' Glow
    5.76 58.5%
    $0.22 €0.12
All instants (3)
  1. Bold Defense relevance 6.00 · 54.7% (29 of 53 decks)
  2. Chain of Silence relevance 5.85 · 56.6% (30 of 53 decks)
  3. Candles' Glow relevance 5.76 · 58.5% (31 of 53 decks)

EDH data for Capashen Templar: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 53 real decks.