Darkness
Played in 4,018 Dimir decks
3030+3+5+6+15+7+9+5+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Lord of the Nazgûl 4.9% of decks
Lord of the Nazgûl 4.9% of decks
Jon Irenicus, Shattered One 4.1% of decks
Jon Irenicus, Shattered One 4.1% of decks
Basim Ibn Ishaq 6.1% of decks
Basim Ibn Ishaq 6.1% of decks
Sygg, River Cutthroat 5.3% of decks
Sygg, River Cutthroat 5.3% of decks
Alela, Cunning Conqueror 3.0% of decks
Alela, Cunning Conqueror 3.0% of decks
Tasha, the Witch Queen 3.4% of decks
Tasha, the Witch Queen 3.4% of decks
Most Relevant
Propaganda 30.5% of decks
Propaganda 30.5% of decks
Aetherize 23.8% of decks
Aetherize 23.8% of decks
Mana Drain 27.4% of decks
Mana Drain 27.4% of decks
Deadly Rollick 29.8% of decks
Deadly Rollick 29.8% of decks
Cyclonic Rift 28.6% of decks
Cyclonic Rift 28.6% of decks
Arcane Denial 32.8% of decks
Arcane Denial 32.8% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Lord of the Nazgûl relevance 1.49 · 4.9% (419 of 8,620 decks)
- Jon Irenicus, Shattered One relevance 1.29 · 4.1% (305 of 7,405 decks)
- Basim Ibn Ishaq relevance 1.16 · 6.1% (63 of 1,036 decks)
- Sygg, River Cutthroat relevance 1.08 · 5.3% (64 of 1,203 decks)
- Alela, Cunning Conqueror relevance 1.08 · 3.0% (314 of 10,310 decks)
- Tasha, the Witch Queen relevance 0.94 · 3.4% (105 of 3,066 decks)
- Nymris, Oona's Trickster relevance 0.88 · 4.6% (38 of 825 decks)
- Dralnu, Lich Lord relevance 0.87 · 7.1% (17 of 239 decks)
- Ukkima, Stalking Shadow relevance 0.87 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Lazav, the Multifarious relevance 0.84 · 4.3% (37 of 855 decks)
- Talion, the Kindly Lord relevance 0.84 · 2.9% (104 of 3,618 decks)
- Lazav, Dimir Mastermind relevance 0.79 · 3.3% (53 of 1,585 decks)
- Phenax, God of Deception relevance 0.75 · 2.3% (113 of 4,825 decks)
- Emet-Selch of the Third Seat relevance 0.73 · 3.2% (44 of 1,379 decks)
- Sivitri, Dragon Master relevance 0.73 · 3.2% (43 of 1,351 decks)
- Garland, Royal Kidnapper relevance 0.71 · 2.6% (64 of 2,449 decks)
- Inquisitor Eisenhorn relevance 0.71 · 4.0% (24 of 607 decks)
- Ramses, Assassin Lord relevance 0.69 · 3.2% (34 of 1,056 decks)
- Ramirez DePietro relevance 0.67 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Golbez, Crystal Collector relevance 0.64 · 1.8% (145 of 8,235 decks)
- Wilhelt, the Rotcleaver relevance 0.63 · 1.6% (200 of 12,736 decks)
- Scion of Halaster // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.62 · 2.5% (44 of 1,794 decks)
- Gríma, Saruman's Footman relevance 0.61 · 3.4% (20 of 591 decks)
- Toxrill, the Corrosive relevance 0.60 · 1.9% (85 of 4,511 decks)
- The Scarab God relevance 0.60 · 1.6% (134 of 8,253 decks)
- Jon Irenicus, the Exile relevance 0.59 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Vren, the Relentless relevance 0.58 · 1.6% (115 of 7,099 decks)
- Ghost, Spectral Saboteur relevance 0.56 · 7.6% (5 of 66 decks)
- Xanathar, Guild Kingpin relevance 0.54 · 2.3% (31 of 1,332 decks)
- Umbris, Fear Manifest relevance 0.53 · 1.5% (108 of 7,369 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Propaganda relevance 0.54 · 30.5% (1,225 of 4,018 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.53 · 23.8% (957 of 4,018 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.50 · 27.4% (1,101 of 4,018 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.48 · 29.8% (1,196 of 4,018 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.46 · 28.6% (1,149 of 4,018 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.45 · 32.8% (1,318 of 4,018 decks)
- Withering Torment relevance 0.44 · 22.7% (913 of 4,018 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.43 · 26.5% (1,064 of 4,018 decks)
- Baleful Strix relevance 0.41 · 28.1% (1,129 of 4,018 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.41 · 31.9% (1,283 of 4,018 decks)
- Sudden Spoiling relevance 0.41 · 10.6% (426 of 4,018 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.41 · 28.8% (1,156 of 4,018 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.41 · 30.1% (1,209 of 4,018 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.40 · 20.9% (838 of 4,018 decks)
- Black Market Connections relevance 0.39 · 17.3% (695 of 4,018 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.39 · 13.0% (524 of 4,018 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.38 · 24.1% (970 of 4,018 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.38 · 16.5% (663 of 4,018 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.38 · 13.7% (550 of 4,018 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.38 · 21.4% (861 of 4,018 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.38 · 16.3% (655 of 4,018 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.38 · 20.9% (838 of 4,018 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.37 · 27.4% (1,101 of 4,018 decks)
- No Mercy relevance 0.37 · 10.6% (424 of 4,018 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.37 · 22.3% (897 of 4,018 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.37 · 28.3% (1,136 of 4,018 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.36 · 16.0% (642 of 4,018 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.35 · 15.6% (628 of 4,018 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.35 · 18.1% (726 of 4,018 decks)
- Jet Medallion relevance 0.35 · 14.4% (580 of 4,018 decks)
All creatures (3)
- Baleful Strix relevance 0.41 · 28.1% (1,129 of 4,018 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.38 · 16.3% (655 of 4,018 decks)
- Roaming Throne relevance 0.33 · 15.1% (607 of 4,018 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.41 · 31.9% (1,283 of 4,018 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.38 · 13.7% (550 of 4,018 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.37 · 27.4% (1,101 of 4,018 decks)
- Jet Medallion relevance 0.35 · 14.4% (580 of 4,018 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.35 · 14.2% (569 of 4,018 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Propaganda relevance 0.54 · 30.5% (1,225 of 4,018 decks)
- Black Market Connections relevance 0.39 · 17.3% (695 of 4,018 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.38 · 24.1% (970 of 4,018 decks)
- No Mercy relevance 0.37 · 10.6% (424 of 4,018 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.35 · 18.1% (726 of 4,018 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.34 · 15.9% (638 of 4,018 decks)
All instants (15)
- Aetherize relevance 0.53 · 23.8% (957 of 4,018 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.50 · 27.4% (1,101 of 4,018 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.48 · 29.8% (1,196 of 4,018 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.46 · 28.6% (1,149 of 4,018 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.45 · 32.8% (1,318 of 4,018 decks)
- Withering Torment relevance 0.44 · 22.7% (913 of 4,018 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.43 · 26.5% (1,064 of 4,018 decks)
- Sudden Spoiling relevance 0.41 · 10.6% (426 of 4,018 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.40 · 20.9% (838 of 4,018 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.38 · 16.5% (663 of 4,018 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.38 · 20.9% (838 of 4,018 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.37 · 22.3% (897 of 4,018 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.37 · 28.3% (1,136 of 4,018 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.36 · 16.0% (642 of 4,018 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.35 · 15.6% (628 of 4,018 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.41 · 28.8% (1,156 of 4,018 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.41 · 30.1% (1,209 of 4,018 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.39 · 13.0% (524 of 4,018 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.38 · 21.4% (861 of 4,018 decks)
- Blasphemous Edict relevance 0.35 · 11.7% (472 of 4,018 decks)
- Damnation relevance 0.35 · 14.0% (561 of 4,018 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.32 · 17.4% (701 of 4,018 decks)
All utility lands (9)
- Malakir Rebirth // Malakir Mire relevance 0.52 · 23.3% (937 of 4,018 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.49 · 30.6% (1,231 of 4,018 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.49 · 28.2% (1,135 of 4,018 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.48 · 25.9% (1,042 of 4,018 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.42 · 23.7% (951 of 4,018 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.41 · 21.8% (875 of 4,018 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.40 · 10.3% (413 of 4,018 decks)
- Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 0.39 · 17.6% (707 of 4,018 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.37 · 19.8% (796 of 4,018 decks)
All lands (5)
- Gloomlake Verge relevance 0.54 · 37.1% (1,492 of 4,018 decks)
- Sunken Ruins relevance 0.47 · 28.0% (1,126 of 4,018 decks)
- Clearwater Pathway // Murkwater Pathway relevance 0.45 · 30.7% (1,235 of 4,018 decks)
- Cabal Coffers relevance 0.37 · 15.7% (631 of 4,018 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 0.33 · 15.8% (633 of 4,018 decks)
EDH data for Darkness: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 4,018 real decks.





































































