Practical Research
Played in 174 Grixis decks
30+15+1+21+8+4+1+
Color Identity Spread
5.0% Grixis
-
Izzet 2,622 · 74.8%
-
Five-Color 458 · 13.1%
-
Grixis 174 · 5.0%
-
Jeskai 120 · 3.4%
-
Temur 102 · 2.9%
- Other (5) 31 · 0.9%
Most Relevant
Teach by Example 22.4% of decks
Teach by Example 22.4% of decks
Channeled Force 14.9% of decks
Channeled Force 14.9% of decks
Hypothesizzle 12.6% of decks
Hypothesizzle 12.6% of decks
Storm-Kiln Artist 36.2% of decks
Storm-Kiln Artist 36.2% of decks
Expressive Iteration 21.3% of decks
Expressive Iteration 21.3% of decks
Prismari Command 26.4% of decks
Prismari Command 26.4% of decks
All most relevant (30)
- Teach by Example relevance 1.14 · 22.4% (39 of 174 decks)
- Channeled Force relevance 0.93 · 14.9% (26 of 174 decks)
- Hypothesizzle relevance 0.83 · 12.6% (22 of 174 decks)
- Storm-Kiln Artist relevance 0.76 · 36.2% (63 of 174 decks)
- Expressive Iteration relevance 0.73 · 21.3% (37 of 174 decks)
- Prismari Command relevance 0.73 · 26.4% (46 of 174 decks)
- Magma Opus relevance 0.73 · 14.4% (25 of 174 decks)
- Creative Outburst relevance 0.64 · 9.8% (17 of 174 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.63 · 28.7% (50 of 174 decks)
- Kitsa, Otterball Elite relevance 0.62 · 13.8% (24 of 174 decks)
- Refute relevance 0.61 · 13.8% (24 of 174 decks)
- Laughing Mad relevance 0.61 · 19.0% (33 of 174 decks)
- Ozai's Cruelty relevance 0.61 · 11.5% (20 of 174 decks)
- Ashling, Rekindled // Ashling, Rimebound relevance 0.61 · 13.2% (23 of 174 decks)
- Electric Revelation relevance 0.60 · 12.6% (22 of 174 decks)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.60 · 29.3% (51 of 174 decks)
- Goblin Electromancer relevance 0.59 · 24.1% (42 of 174 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.59 · 40.8% (71 of 174 decks)
- Mizzix's Mastery relevance 0.59 · 16.7% (29 of 174 decks)
- Arbiter of Woe relevance 0.58 · 8.6% (15 of 174 decks)
- Sandman's Quicksand relevance 0.58 · 10.9% (19 of 174 decks)
- Maestros Charm relevance 0.58 · 15.5% (27 of 174 decks)
- Veyran, Voice of Duality relevance 0.57 · 21.8% (38 of 174 decks)
- Izzet Charm relevance 0.55 · 14.4% (25 of 174 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.55 · 33.9% (59 of 174 decks)
- Seize the Spoils relevance 0.54 · 14.4% (25 of 174 decks)
- Bone Shards relevance 0.54 · 11.5% (20 of 174 decks)
- Big Score relevance 0.53 · 28.2% (49 of 174 decks)
- Thousand-Year Storm relevance 0.53 · 14.9% (26 of 174 decks)
- Dream Harvest relevance 0.53 · 13.8% (24 of 174 decks)
All creatures (15)
- Storm-Kiln Artist relevance 0.76 · 36.2% (63 of 174 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.63 · 28.7% (50 of 174 decks)
- Kitsa, Otterball Elite relevance 0.62 · 13.8% (24 of 174 decks)
- Ashling, Rekindled // Ashling, Rimebound relevance 0.61 · 13.2% (23 of 174 decks)
- Goblin Electromancer relevance 0.59 · 24.1% (42 of 174 decks)
- Arbiter of Woe relevance 0.58 · 8.6% (15 of 174 decks)
- Veyran, Voice of Duality relevance 0.57 · 21.8% (38 of 174 decks)
- Melek, Reforged Researcher relevance 0.51 · 7.5% (13 of 174 decks)
- Tourach, Dread Cantor relevance 0.50 · 9.8% (17 of 174 decks)
- Copycrook relevance 0.50 · 8.6% (15 of 174 decks)
- Cormela, Glamour Thief relevance 0.49 · 14.9% (26 of 174 decks)
- Kuja, Genome Sorcerer // Trance Kuja, Fate Defied relevance 0.47 · 15.5% (27 of 174 decks)
- Niv-Mizzet, Parun relevance 0.47 · 15.5% (27 of 174 decks)
- Guttersnipe relevance 0.47 · 18.4% (32 of 174 decks)
- Stormcatch Mentor relevance 0.47 · 15.5% (27 of 174 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Thousand-Year Storm relevance 0.53 · 14.9% (26 of 174 decks)
All instants (21)
- Teach by Example relevance 1.14 · 22.4% (39 of 174 decks)
- Channeled Force relevance 0.93 · 14.9% (26 of 174 decks)
- Hypothesizzle relevance 0.83 · 12.6% (22 of 174 decks)
- Prismari Command relevance 0.73 · 26.4% (46 of 174 decks)
- Magma Opus relevance 0.73 · 14.4% (25 of 174 decks)
- Creative Outburst relevance 0.64 · 9.8% (17 of 174 decks)
- Refute relevance 0.61 · 13.8% (24 of 174 decks)
- Laughing Mad relevance 0.61 · 19.0% (33 of 174 decks)
- Electric Revelation relevance 0.60 · 12.6% (22 of 174 decks)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.60 · 29.3% (51 of 174 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.59 · 40.8% (71 of 174 decks)
- Maestros Charm relevance 0.58 · 15.5% (27 of 174 decks)
- Izzet Charm relevance 0.55 · 14.4% (25 of 174 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.55 · 33.9% (59 of 174 decks)
- Big Score relevance 0.53 · 28.2% (49 of 174 decks)
- Galvanic Iteration relevance 0.52 · 12.6% (22 of 174 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.51 · 28.2% (49 of 174 decks)
- Traumatic Critique relevance 0.48 · 10.3% (18 of 174 decks)
- Prismari Charm relevance 0.48 · 10.3% (18 of 174 decks)
- Rakdos Charm relevance 0.47 · 23.0% (40 of 174 decks)
- Lightning Bolt relevance 0.46 · 21.3% (37 of 174 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Expressive Iteration relevance 0.73 · 21.3% (37 of 174 decks)
- Ozai's Cruelty relevance 0.61 · 11.5% (20 of 174 decks)
- Mizzix's Mastery relevance 0.59 · 16.7% (29 of 174 decks)
- Sandman's Quicksand relevance 0.58 · 10.9% (19 of 174 decks)
- Seize the Spoils relevance 0.54 · 14.4% (25 of 174 decks)
- Bone Shards relevance 0.54 · 11.5% (20 of 174 decks)
- Dream Harvest relevance 0.53 · 13.8% (24 of 174 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.49 · 12.1% (21 of 174 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Prismari Campus relevance 0.77 · 13.8% (24 of 174 decks)
- Seething Landscape relevance 0.67 · 31.0% (54 of 174 decks)
- Swiftwater Cliffs relevance 0.58 · 19.5% (34 of 174 decks)
- Bloodfell Caves relevance 0.48 · 15.5% (27 of 174 decks)
All lands (1)
- Shivan Reef relevance 0.54 · 44.3% (77 of 174 decks)
EDH data for Practical Research: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 174 real decks.











































