Circle of the Moon Druid
Played in 48 Naya decks
130+37+5+1+5+1+1+
Color Identity Spread
4.4% Naya
Commanders
Most Relevant
Werebear 62.5% of decks
Werebear 62.5% of decks
Ayula, Queen Among Bears 64.6% of decks
Ayula, Queen Among Bears 64.6% of decks
Grizzly Fate 54.2% of decks
Grizzly Fate 54.2% of decks
Owlbear 45.8% of decks
Owlbear 45.8% of decks
Grizzly Bears 52.1% of decks
Grizzly Bears 52.1% of decks
Mother Bear 54.2% of decks
Mother Bear 54.2% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 1.86 · 3.1% (6 of 194 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Werebear relevance 3.52 · 62.5% (30 of 48 decks)
- Ayula, Queen Among Bears relevance 3.09 · 64.6% (31 of 48 decks)
- Grizzly Fate relevance 3.01 · 54.2% (26 of 48 decks)
- Owlbear relevance 2.92 · 45.8% (22 of 48 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 2.76 · 52.1% (25 of 48 decks)
- Mother Bear relevance 2.74 · 54.2% (26 of 48 decks)
- Bearscape relevance 2.74 · 50.0% (24 of 48 decks)
- Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 2.71 · 58.3% (28 of 48 decks)
- Kudo, King Among Bears relevance 2.68 · 62.5% (30 of 48 decks)
- Owlbear Cub relevance 2.66 · 45.8% (22 of 48 decks)
- Words of Wilding relevance 2.52 · 41.7% (20 of 48 decks)
- Hurska Sweet-Tooth relevance 2.49 · 39.6% (19 of 48 decks)
- Ayula's Influence relevance 2.47 · 43.8% (21 of 48 decks)
- Runeclaw Bear relevance 2.37 · 43.8% (21 of 48 decks)
- Ashcoat Bear relevance 2.32 · 43.8% (21 of 48 decks)
- Balduvian Bears relevance 2.31 · 41.7% (20 of 48 decks)
- Copper Host Crusher relevance 2.25 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Bear Cub relevance 2.24 · 41.7% (20 of 48 decks)
- Fade from History relevance 2.20 · 39.6% (19 of 48 decks)
- Druid's Familiar relevance 2.19 · 39.6% (19 of 48 decks)
- Kamahl's Summons relevance 2.17 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Striped Bears relevance 2.14 · 37.5% (18 of 48 decks)
- Drover Grizzly relevance 2.13 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid relevance 2.13 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Awaken the Bear relevance 2.10 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 2.10 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Ulvenwald Bear relevance 2.03 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 1.96 · 52.1% (25 of 48 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 1.96 · 43.8% (21 of 48 decks)
- Bosco, Just a Bear relevance 1.91 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
All creatures (37)
- Werebear relevance 3.52 · 62.5% (30 of 48 decks)
- Ayula, Queen Among Bears relevance 3.09 · 64.6% (31 of 48 decks)
- Owlbear relevance 2.92 · 45.8% (22 of 48 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 2.76 · 52.1% (25 of 48 decks)
- Mother Bear relevance 2.74 · 54.2% (26 of 48 decks)
- Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 2.71 · 58.3% (28 of 48 decks)
- Kudo, King Among Bears relevance 2.68 · 62.5% (30 of 48 decks)
- Owlbear Cub relevance 2.66 · 45.8% (22 of 48 decks)
- Hurska Sweet-Tooth relevance 2.49 · 39.6% (19 of 48 decks)
- Runeclaw Bear relevance 2.37 · 43.8% (21 of 48 decks)
- Ashcoat Bear relevance 2.32 · 43.8% (21 of 48 decks)
- Balduvian Bears relevance 2.31 · 41.7% (20 of 48 decks)
- Copper Host Crusher relevance 2.25 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Bear Cub relevance 2.24 · 41.7% (20 of 48 decks)
- Druid's Familiar relevance 2.19 · 39.6% (19 of 48 decks)
- Striped Bears relevance 2.14 · 37.5% (18 of 48 decks)
- Drover Grizzly relevance 2.13 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid relevance 2.13 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 2.10 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Ulvenwald Bear relevance 2.03 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 1.96 · 52.1% (25 of 48 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 1.96 · 43.8% (21 of 48 decks)
- Bosco, Just a Bear relevance 1.91 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Evercoat Ursine relevance 1.81 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Caller of the Claw relevance 1.61 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Rampaging Yao Guai relevance 1.55 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Little Bear relevance 1.51 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.51 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Forest Bear relevance 1.49 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Studious First-Year // Rampant Growth relevance 1.45 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Beorn the Fierce relevance 1.42 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Pale Bears relevance 1.34 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- Owlbear Shepherd relevance 1.29 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- The Earth King relevance 1.27 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Casal, Lurkwood Pathfinder // Casal, Pathbreaker Owlbear relevance 1.20 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Friendly Teddy relevance 1.12 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Stormkeld Vanguard // Bear Down relevance 1.11 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Bearscape relevance 2.74 · 50.0% (24 of 48 decks)
- Words of Wilding relevance 2.52 · 41.7% (20 of 48 decks)
- Ayula's Influence relevance 2.47 · 43.8% (21 of 48 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 1.45 · 41.7% (20 of 48 decks)
- Dancing from Dark to Dawn relevance 1.33 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
All instants (1)
- Awaken the Bear relevance 2.10 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Grizzly Fate relevance 3.01 · 54.2% (26 of 48 decks)
- Fade from History relevance 2.20 · 39.6% (19 of 48 decks)
- Kamahl's Summons relevance 2.17 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 1.85 · 37.5% (18 of 48 decks)
- Overrun relevance 1.02 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Garruk, Unleashed relevance 1.50 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 2.01 · 37.5% (18 of 48 decks)
EDH data for Circle of the Moon Druid: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 48 real decks.






























