Siege Wurm
Played in 125 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
10.7% Simic
430+35+3+5+4+1+2+
That's every commander.
All commanders (4)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 3.09 · 2.4% (76 of 3,125 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 1.01 · 1.5% (4 of 261 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.45 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.38 · 1.0% (1 of 99 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Wretched Gryff relevance 2.36 · 36.0% (45 of 125 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 2.17 · 37.6% (47 of 125 decks)
- Aethersnipe relevance 2.11 · 39.2% (49 of 125 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 2.10 · 47.2% (59 of 125 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 1.77 · 40.0% (50 of 125 decks)
- Krosan Drover relevance 1.76 · 34.4% (43 of 125 decks)
- Mirrorshell Crab relevance 1.72 · 32.0% (40 of 125 decks)
- It of the Horrid Swarm relevance 1.69 · 24.8% (31 of 125 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 1.65 · 25.6% (32 of 125 decks)
- Greater Tanuki relevance 1.63 · 35.2% (44 of 125 decks)
- Mental Journey relevance 1.57 · 24.0% (30 of 125 decks)
- Ulamog's Crusher relevance 1.53 · 29.6% (37 of 125 decks)
- Scour from Existence relevance 1.42 · 20.8% (26 of 125 decks)
- Rush of Knowledge relevance 1.40 · 26.4% (33 of 125 decks)
- Sword Coast Serpent // Capsizing Wave relevance 1.40 · 31.2% (39 of 125 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmaw relevance 1.39 · 21.6% (27 of 125 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 1.36 · 36.0% (45 of 125 decks)
- Rust Goliath relevance 1.35 · 21.6% (27 of 125 decks)
- Tolarian Terror relevance 1.23 · 24.0% (30 of 125 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 1.23 · 37.6% (47 of 125 decks)
- Forceful Denial relevance 1.16 · 21.6% (27 of 125 decks)
- Natural Reclamation relevance 1.16 · 26.4% (33 of 125 decks)
- Etherium Spinner relevance 1.01 · 15.2% (19 of 125 decks)
- Slavering Branchsnapper relevance 1.00 · 15.2% (19 of 125 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 1.00 · 20.8% (26 of 125 decks)
- Warped Tusker relevance 0.98 · 15.2% (19 of 125 decks)
- Dread Linnorm // Scale Deflection relevance 0.89 · 16.0% (20 of 125 decks)
- Mechanozoa relevance 0.88 · 14.4% (18 of 125 decks)
- Drownyard Lurker relevance 0.87 · 13.6% (17 of 125 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.80 · 28.0% (35 of 125 decks)
All creatures (35)
- Wretched Gryff relevance 2.36 · 36.0% (45 of 125 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 2.17 · 37.6% (47 of 125 decks)
- Aethersnipe relevance 2.11 · 39.2% (49 of 125 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 2.10 · 47.2% (59 of 125 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 1.77 · 40.0% (50 of 125 decks)
- Krosan Drover relevance 1.76 · 34.4% (43 of 125 decks)
- Mirrorshell Crab relevance 1.72 · 32.0% (40 of 125 decks)
- It of the Horrid Swarm relevance 1.69 · 24.8% (31 of 125 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 1.65 · 25.6% (32 of 125 decks)
- Greater Tanuki relevance 1.63 · 35.2% (44 of 125 decks)
- Ulamog's Crusher relevance 1.53 · 29.6% (37 of 125 decks)
- Sword Coast Serpent // Capsizing Wave relevance 1.40 · 31.2% (39 of 125 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmaw relevance 1.39 · 21.6% (27 of 125 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 1.36 · 36.0% (45 of 125 decks)
- Rust Goliath relevance 1.35 · 21.6% (27 of 125 decks)
- Tolarian Terror relevance 1.23 · 24.0% (30 of 125 decks)
- Etherium Spinner relevance 1.01 · 15.2% (19 of 125 decks)
- Slavering Branchsnapper relevance 1.00 · 15.2% (19 of 125 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 1.00 · 20.8% (26 of 125 decks)
- Warped Tusker relevance 0.98 · 15.2% (19 of 125 decks)
- Dread Linnorm // Scale Deflection relevance 0.89 · 16.0% (20 of 125 decks)
- Mechanozoa relevance 0.88 · 14.4% (18 of 125 decks)
- Drownyard Lurker relevance 0.87 · 13.6% (17 of 125 decks)
- Snapping Voidcraw relevance 0.79 · 17.6% (22 of 125 decks)
- Gearseeker Serpent relevance 0.79 · 12.0% (15 of 125 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.78 · 21.6% (27 of 125 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.74 · 21.6% (27 of 125 decks)
- Daggermaw Megalodon relevance 0.73 · 11.2% (14 of 125 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 0.71 · 12.8% (16 of 125 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.63 · 20.0% (25 of 125 decks)
- Striped Riverwinder relevance 0.63 · 9.6% (12 of 125 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.61 · 16.0% (20 of 125 decks)
- Fungal Colossus relevance 0.60 · 8.8% (11 of 125 decks)
- Ice Flan relevance 0.60 · 8.8% (11 of 125 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 0.58 · 9.6% (12 of 125 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.80 · 28.0% (35 of 125 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.77 · 23.2% (29 of 125 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmask relevance 0.62 · 9.6% (12 of 125 decks)
All instants (5)
- Mental Journey relevance 1.57 · 24.0% (30 of 125 decks)
- Scour from Existence relevance 1.42 · 20.8% (26 of 125 decks)
- Forceful Denial relevance 1.16 · 21.6% (27 of 125 decks)
- Natural Reclamation relevance 1.16 · 26.4% (33 of 125 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.74 · 34.4% (43 of 125 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Rush of Knowledge relevance 1.40 · 26.4% (33 of 125 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 1.23 · 37.6% (47 of 125 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.79 · 22.4% (28 of 125 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.59 · 33.6% (42 of 125 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.59 · 16.0% (20 of 125 decks)
All lands (2)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.76 · 38.4% (48 of 125 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.69 · 26.4% (33 of 125 decks)
EDH data for Siege Wurm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 125 real decks.









































