Krosan Avenger
Played in 56 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
56 decks
- Green 30 · 53.6%
- Selesnya 7 · 12.5%
- Golgari 6 · 10.7%
- Gruul 5 · 8.9%
- Simic 2 · 3.6%
- Abzan 2 · 3.6%
- Other (4) 4 · 7.1%
Commanders
6
Commanders
6Showing 1-6 of 6
Page size
All commanders (6)
- Seton, Krosan Protector relevance 2.74 · 2.7% (16 of 584 decks)
- Surrak, Elusive Hunter relevance 1.05 · 2.6% (2 of 77 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Criminal Past relevance 0.97 · 4.0% (1 of 25 decks)
- Zegana, Utopian Speaker relevance 0.89 · 1.3% (1 of 79 decks)
- Thriss, Nantuko Primus relevance 0.68 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.56 · 1.2% (1 of 85 decks)
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30Showing 1-10 of 30
Page size
All most relevant (30)
- Krosan Restorer relevance 2.61 · 37.5% (21 of 56 decks)
- Seton's Scout relevance 2.33 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Nantuko Blightcutter relevance 2.11 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Nantuko Calmer relevance 2.08 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Werebear relevance 2.06 · 33.9% (19 of 56 decks)
- Nantuko Disciple relevance 1.93 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Druid Lyrist relevance 1.90 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Nantuko Mentor relevance 1.85 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Nut Collector relevance 1.82 · 28.6% (16 of 56 decks)
- Centaur Rootcaster relevance 1.68 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Diligent Farmhand relevance 1.68 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
- Nantuko Elder relevance 1.68 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
- Nimble Mongoose relevance 1.62 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
- Springing Tiger relevance 1.62 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Seton's Desire relevance 1.58 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 1.48 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Anurid Barkripper relevance 1.45 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Krosan Wayfarer relevance 1.45 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 1.42 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
- Harvester Druid relevance 1.40 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
- Llanowar Druid relevance 1.37 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Woodland Druid relevance 1.34 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Ley Druid relevance 1.28 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Nantuko Cultivator relevance 1.24 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
- Krosan Beast relevance 1.20 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Argothian Elder relevance 1.19 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Elvish Pioneer relevance 1.19 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Nullmage Advocate relevance 1.15 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Crush of Wurms relevance 1.12 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Heart Warden relevance 1.11 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
Creatures
34
Creatures
34 Showing 1-10 of 34
Page size
All creatures (34)
- Krosan Restorer relevance 2.61 · 37.5% (21 of 56 decks)
- Seton's Scout relevance 2.33 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Nantuko Blightcutter relevance 2.11 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Nantuko Calmer relevance 2.08 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Werebear relevance 2.06 · 33.9% (19 of 56 decks)
- Nantuko Disciple relevance 1.93 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Druid Lyrist relevance 1.90 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Nantuko Mentor relevance 1.85 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Nut Collector relevance 1.82 · 28.6% (16 of 56 decks)
- Centaur Rootcaster relevance 1.68 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Diligent Farmhand relevance 1.68 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
- Nantuko Elder relevance 1.68 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
- Nimble Mongoose relevance 1.62 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
- Springing Tiger relevance 1.62 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 1.48 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Anurid Barkripper relevance 1.45 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Krosan Wayfarer relevance 1.45 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Harvester Druid relevance 1.40 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
- Llanowar Druid relevance 1.37 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Woodland Druid relevance 1.34 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Ley Druid relevance 1.28 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Nantuko Cultivator relevance 1.24 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
- Krosan Beast relevance 1.20 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Argothian Elder relevance 1.19 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Elvish Pioneer relevance 1.19 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Nullmage Advocate relevance 1.15 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Heart Warden relevance 1.11 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.07 · 46.4% (26 of 56 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.91 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
- Citanul Hierophants relevance 0.89 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.73 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.70 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.57 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.46 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
Enchantments
2
Enchantments
2 
All enchantments (2)
- Seton's Desire relevance 1.58 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.63 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
Instants
6
Instants
6 Showing 1-6 of 6
Page size
All instants (6)
- Moment's Peace relevance 0.95 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.83 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.78 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.64 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.47 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.43 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
Sorceries
8
Sorceries
8 Showing 1-8 of 8
Page size
All sorceries (8)
- Far Wanderings relevance 1.42 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
- Crush of Wurms relevance 1.12 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Mobilize relevance 0.98 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.69 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.59 · 28.6% (16 of 56 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.46 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.44 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.34 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
EDH data for Krosan Avenger: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 56 real decks.