Old Fat Spider
Played in 80 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
3.6% Gruul
All commanders (3)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 2.45 · 1.7% (31 of 1,823 decks)
- Borborygmos relevance 1.29 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Rhino, Barreling Brute relevance 0.73 · 1.3% (2 of 150 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Gigantic Big Bear relevance 2.37 · 38.8% (31 of 80 decks)
- Desert Were-Worm relevance 1.65 · 35.0% (28 of 80 decks)
- Red Hulk relevance 1.42 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Savage Land Dinosaur relevance 1.34 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Stormkeld Vanguard // Bear Down relevance 1.31 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Cleanup Crew relevance 1.30 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 1.26 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Timberland Ancient relevance 1.26 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Slavering Branchsnapper relevance 1.24 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Combustible Gearhulk relevance 1.22 · 35.0% (28 of 80 decks)
- Oliphaunt relevance 1.20 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Myojin of Roaring Blades relevance 1.18 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Ulvenwald Observer relevance 1.16 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Seismic Monstrosaur relevance 1.15 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Inferno Titan relevance 1.13 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 1.13 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Burning Sun's Avatar relevance 1.12 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Rhino, Barreling Brute relevance 1.09 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 1.08 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Shriekwood Devourer relevance 1.05 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 1.04 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Saber-Tooth Moose-Lion relevance 0.97 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Regal Behemoth relevance 0.97 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Galewind Moose relevance 0.96 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Stalking Vengeance relevance 0.95 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Topiary Panther relevance 0.93 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 0.93 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Realm Seekers relevance 0.92 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Savage Ventmaw relevance 0.88 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- Cyclops of Eternal Fury relevance 0.87 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
All creatures (49)
- Gigantic Big Bear relevance 2.37 · 38.8% (31 of 80 decks)
- Desert Were-Worm relevance 1.65 · 35.0% (28 of 80 decks)
- Red Hulk relevance 1.42 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Savage Land Dinosaur relevance 1.34 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Stormkeld Vanguard // Bear Down relevance 1.31 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Cleanup Crew relevance 1.30 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 1.26 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Timberland Ancient relevance 1.26 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Slavering Branchsnapper relevance 1.24 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Combustible Gearhulk relevance 1.22 · 35.0% (28 of 80 decks)
- Oliphaunt relevance 1.20 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Myojin of Roaring Blades relevance 1.18 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Ulvenwald Observer relevance 1.16 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Seismic Monstrosaur relevance 1.15 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Inferno Titan relevance 1.13 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 1.13 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Burning Sun's Avatar relevance 1.12 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Rhino, Barreling Brute relevance 1.09 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 1.08 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Shriekwood Devourer relevance 1.05 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 1.04 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Saber-Tooth Moose-Lion relevance 0.97 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Regal Behemoth relevance 0.97 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Galewind Moose relevance 0.96 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Stalking Vengeance relevance 0.95 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Topiary Panther relevance 0.93 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 0.93 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Realm Seekers relevance 0.92 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Savage Ventmaw relevance 0.88 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- Cyclops of Eternal Fury relevance 0.87 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Emissary of Grudges relevance 0.82 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.82 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Rapacious One relevance 0.82 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Coliseum Behemoth relevance 0.82 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Groundchuck & Dirtbag relevance 0.81 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Balamb T-Rexaur relevance 0.80 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 0.78 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.78 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Boarding Party relevance 0.78 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.78 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Beorn, Reluctant Host // Till and Tend relevance 0.76 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Rocksteady, Crash Courser relevance 0.76 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.75 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Drakuseth, Maw of Flames relevance 0.75 · 26.3% (21 of 80 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.74 · 40.0% (32 of 80 decks)
- Hoard-Smelter Dragon relevance 0.74 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.71 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Cloudthresher relevance 0.68 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Gladiolus Amicitia relevance 0.68 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.75 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
EDH data for Old Fat Spider: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 80 real decks.